group dead??

2012-09-09 Thread Ton Muller
is this group dead?
3e this mont last message



Re: xenocara not building on amd64-current

2012-09-09 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:58:55PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:44:35AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
  A lot of effort is expended trying to get snapshots out quickly after
  toolchain changes, precisely to make things easy for people.  Even if
  you think you can figure out building from the source, the polite
  thing to do is to use the snapshots anyway. :)
 
 I am very grateful for the effort the developers put into the snapshots,
 so I don't mean this as criticism.  But it is possible for somebody
 reading the thread to believe that the latest snapshot would allow
 xenocara to build.  As far as I can tell, it does not (yet) on
 amd64.

Afacit, it does build. What error are you getting ? 

 
 Since I'm sure it will be fixed by another snapshot soon, this is no big
 deal.
 

-- 
Matthieu Herrb



Re: group dead??

2012-09-09 Thread Johan Ryberg
We are dead silent, waiting for 5.2

2012/9/9 Ton Muller spatie...@online.nl

 is this group dead?
 3e this mont last message



Re: Snort not logging to alerts files

2012-09-09 Thread Markus Lude
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:54:07AM -0400, Bentley, Dain wrote:
 Hello Misc,
 I've installed Snort on OpenBSD 4.9 from source and everything installed
 fine.
 When I configure the following rules I see alerts generated:
 
 # cat /etc/snort/snort.conf
 include /etc/snort/rules/icmp.rules
 
 # cat /etc/snort/rules/icmp.rules
 alert icmp any any - any any (msg:ICMP Packet; sid:477; rev:3;)
 
 /usr/local/bin/snort --daq-dir /usr/local/lib/daq -c /etc/snort/snort.conf -l
 /var/log/snort -i fxp1
 
 So when I ping the outside interface I get the following in
 /var/log/snort/alert
 
 [**] [1:477:3] ICMP Packet [**]
 [Priority: 0]
 09/07-10:30:08.599075 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 ICMP TTL:113 TOS:0x20 ID:25441 IpLen:20 DgmLen:28
 Type:8  Code:0  ID:512   Seq:26063  ECHO
 
 So I now snort can see packets.  Even though I have icmp blocked on the
 outside interface it still logs it.

Why should snort not see them? snort sees packet which arrive at that
interface. Packet filters handle packets later.

 When download and load the snort rules from the snort site nothing happens.
 The logfile sits empty.

What do you expect? Do you have configured snort correctly? Are the
rules you want to fire really enabled?

 Has anyone successfully installed snort on openbsd and logged data?

Of course. Running recent snort on -current.

Recently I send an update of the snort port to ports@. Maybe you could
help test it, so we have a more up-to-date snort version in 5.3.

Regards,
Markus



ospf6d problem when a route already exists with a different nexthop

2012-09-09 Thread Manuel Guesdon
Hi,

When an ospf route already exists, ospf6d doesn't update the nexthop.
I have 6 routers (4 with openbsd 5.0, 2 with openbsd 4.9) running ospfd,
ospf6d and bgpd, routeur id is on lo1.

For some reason (see at end for a way to reproduce it), one of the router
(openbsd 5.0 one) have multiple ospf ipv6 routes still in fib (even if no more
ospf6d or bgpd process is running). For exemple:

root@core3: route -n get -inet6 :::a
   route to: :::a
destination: :::a
gateway: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:3a1%vlan216
  interface: vlan216
 if address: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:348%vlan216
   priority: 32 (ospf)
  flags: UP,GATEWAY,HOST,DONE
 use   mtuexpire
4200 0 0

:::a is the loopback address of another router (the gateway is
obviously wrong as I've killed ospf6d and bgpd on the referenced host).

when starting ospf6d, a new route for :::a is found but ospf6d
find the previous one and don't change the nexthop. And when killing
ospf6d it doesn't remove it.

If I route delete -inet6 -host :::a
fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:3a1%vlan216, and restart ospf6d the problem disappear.

I've took a look at ospf6d/kroute.c and found this route is processed like
that:

kr_change(struct kroute *kroute)
{
struct kroute_node  *kr;
int  action = RTM_ADD;

kroute-rtlabel = rtlabel_tag2id(kroute-ext_tag);

if ((kr = kroute_find(kroute-prefix, kroute-prefixlen)) !=
NULL) {
=== goes here

if (!(kr-r.flags  F_KERNEL))
action = RTM_CHANGE;
else {  /* a non-ospf route already exists. not a problem */
=== goes here
if (!(kr-r.flags  F_BGPD_INSERTED)) {
=== goes here
do {
kr-r.flags |= F_OSPFD_INSERTED;
kr = kr-next;
} while (kr);
=== exit (nexthop is unchanged)
return (0);
}



This problem occurs when the prefix is announced by different
ospf peers with a different nexthop. Exemple:

When starting ospf6d a first route is added learned from one ospf6d peer:

root@core3: route -n get -inet6 :::8
   route to: :::8
destination: :::8
gateway: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:365%vlan222
  interface: vlan222
 if address: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:345%vlan222
   priority: 32 (ospf)
  flags: UP,GATEWAY,HOST,DONE
 use   mtuexpire
   0 0 0

Next a second route is learned (gateway on fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:321%vlan213
which is the most direct route) but ospf6d doesn't update it.

Here some traces I've added in ospf6d:
MG kr_change:  prefix :::8/128
MG send_rtmsg1: action 1, prefix :::8/128
MG send_rtmsg2: action 1, nexthop: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:365
...
MG kr_change:  prefix :::8/128
MG kr_change2: found prefix :::8/128
MG kr_change:  prefix :::8/128 !FKERNEL
MG send_rtmsg1: action 3, prefix :::8/128
MG send_rtmsg2: action 3, nexthop: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:321
send_rtmsg: action 1, prefix :::8/128: File exists


After killing ospf6d, (first/bad) route is still here:
root@core3:usr.sbin$ route -n get -inet6 :::8
   route to: :::8
destination: :::8
gateway: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:365%vlan222
  interface: vlan222
 if address: fe80::5054:60ff:fe60:345%vlan222
   priority: 32 (ospf)
  flags: UP,GATEWAY,HOST,DONE
 use   mtuexpire
  28 0 0

I've retried multiple times and when the 1st learned route is the good one
(via vlan213) the route is well deleted when killing ospf6d.


I've tried to compare with ospfd and found that the following chnage seems to
handle nexthop change case:
 
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c.diff?r1=1.52;r2=1.53;f=h

May be common changes in ospfd weren't ported to ospf6d ?


Manuel 



Curso Bimestral CONSULTORÍA de EMPRESAS FAMILIARES

2012-09-09 Thread difusion
Escuela Sistémica Argentina
Institución dedicada a la formación, asistencia e investigación
psicológica



Curso Bimestral 2012

CONSULTORÍA de EMPRESAS FAMILIARES

Docente a cargo:  Laura Alvarez 

Dirigido a: Consultores, Dueños y Directores de empresas, alta y media
gerencia, Terapeutas familiares  y a todos los profesionales interesados
en especializarse en la consultoría de Empresas Familiares, aprendiendo y
profundizando sobre las complejas y diversas temáticas que atraviesan las
Organizaciones Familiares.

Objetivos:

  * Aprender a nivel teórico y práctico: herramientas, tácticas y
técnicas de intervención aplicables a la consultoría de empresas
Familiares.

  * Desarrollar destrezas y habilidades del rol del consultor.
Facilitar cambios de conductas en las familias empresarias y equipos
que se desempeñan en la organización, con la finalidad de contribuir
de manera eficaz y satisfactoria al logro de los objetivos de la
misma.

  * Trabajar, asesorar y orientara los directivos, empresarios,
ejecutivos, empleados y profesionales, que forman parte de la
empresa,en la resolución de conflictos interpersonales,en el armado y
corrección del organigrama de puestos, tareas y funciones y en el
diseño de capacitaciones a “medida” – In Company.

  * Prevenir, analizar y resolver crisis de cambio y actualización
empresaria.

  * Acompañar y asistir a la familia empresaria, en la resolución de
conflictos familiares que afectan directamente sobre la empresa que
dirigen.

Día de cursado: Miércoles de 19 a 21 hs
Inicio: 03 de octubre de 2012 / Duración: 9 clases

Programa:

MÓDULO 1: LA EMPRESA COMO “SISTEMA SOCIAL”, CLASIFICACIONES Y ÁREAS QUE
LA COMPONEN.

MÓDULO 2: VISIÓN SISTÉMICA DE LA EMPRESA FAMILIAR Y SUS ETAPAS EVOLUTIVAS

MÓDULO 3: VALORES, CULTURA y ESTRATEGIA. VISIÓN y MISIÓN y ESTILOS DE
DIRECCIÓN

MÓDULO 4: FACTORES  A TENER EN CUENTA CUANDO LA FAMILIA TRABAJA JUNTA.

MÓDULO 5: LA FAMILIA EMPRESARIA EN CONSULTA

MÓDULO 6: EL ROL DEL CONSULTOR –Herramientas yMetodología de trabajo

MÓDULO 7: RECURSOS Y TÉCNICAS DE INTERVENCIÓN APLICABLES: DISEÑO DE
PLANILLAS CON TAREAS PARA TRABAJAR CON TODOS LOS RRHH  QUE PARTICIPAN EN
EL PROCESO DE CONSULTORÍA

MÓDULO 8: REQUERIMIENTOS BÁSICOS para el armado de los EQUIPOS de
trabajo.

MÓDULO 9: ÓRGANOS DE GOBIERNO.

MÓDULO 10: DISEÑO DE CAPACITACIÓN A “MEDIDA” – COACHING

Actividad arancelada

Se entregará certificado de asistencia



Escuela Sistémica Argentina
Fray J. S. María de Oro 1843 (C1414DBC)
Telf: (5411) 4774-2875/ 6112 / 4899-1053

www.escuelasistemica.com.ar



ПРАВО. КАДРЫ. ДЕЛОПРОИЗВОДСТВО

2012-09-09 Thread Курсы повышения квалификации
Êóðñû ïîâûøåíèÿ êâàëèôèêàöèè äëÿ êàäðîâèêîâ

ÏÐÀÂÎ. ÊÀÄÐÛ. ÄÅËÎÏÐÎÈÇÂÎÄÑÒÂÎ
http://khost.com.ua/9/mediapro1.html

17-22 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2012 ãîäà, ã. Êèåâ

Ðåãèñòðàöèÿ
http://khost.com.ua/9/zayavka.doc

Ïîäðîáíåé: 0(44) 507-2228

×èòàòü ïðîãðàììó


Êàæäûé ó÷àñòíèê ïîëó÷èò ñâèäåòåëüñòâî ãîñ. îáðàçöà!
 Â ïðîãðàììå:
Ïðàâîâîå ðåãóëèðîâàíèå òðóäîâûõ îòíîøåíèé
Êàäðîâîå äåëîïðîèçâîäñòâî îò À äî ß
Ãëàâíîå î çàùèòå ïåðñîíàëüíûõ äàííûõ
Ïåíñèîííûå âîïðîñû
Ïîäãîòîâêà ê ïðîâåðêàì
1ñ äëÿ êàäðîâèêîâ
Ñîöèàëüíîå ñòðàõîâàíèå
Àòòåñòàöèÿ ðàáî÷èõ ìåñò ïî óñëîâèÿì òðóäà
Óïðàâëåíèå ïåðñîíàëîì: ïîäáîð, ìîòèâàöèÿ, ðàçâèòèå



Âðåìÿ îáó÷åíèÿ — 72 àêàä. ÷àñà, ïí.-ïò., 09.00 - 16.00
22.09.12 - çà÷åòíîå òåñòèðîâàíèå, ïîëó÷åíèå ñâèäåòåëüñòâà.
Çàíÿòèÿ ïðîõîäÿò â öåíòðå ãîðîäà, â Äîìå Êèíî.
Êóðñû ïðîõîäÿò ïðè ïîääåðæêå:
Íàöèîíàëüíûé ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèé óíèâåðñèòåò èìåíè Ì.Ï. Äðàãîìàíîâà
Èíñòèòóò ïåðåïîäãîòîâêè è ïîâûøåíèÿ êâàëèôèêàöèèÆóðíàë «Äîâ³äíèê
êàäðîâèêà»Âñåóêðàèíñêàÿ àññîöèàöèÿ êàäðîâèêîâ


Ñòîèìîñòü ó÷àñòèÿ — 2560 ãðí. (ñ ÍÄÑ)

 ñòîèìîñòü âõîäÿò: ìàòåðèàëû ïå÷àòíûå è íà ýë. íîñèòåëå (ñ ó÷åòîì èçìåíåíèé â
çàêîíîäàòåëüñòâå), ïèòàíèå, äåëîâûå àêñåññóàðû.

Äëÿ ïîäïèñ÷èêîâ ÈÄ «ÌÅÄÈÀ-ÏÐλ — ñêèäêà 5%!
Ðåêîìåíäàöèè ïðîôåññèîíàëîâ!


Åùå ñåìèíàðû Profosvita
http://khost.com.ua/9/mediapro2.html

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 
19733424.jpg]



Re: Snort not logging to alerts files

2012-09-09 Thread Bentley, Dain
I got it working fine. It's logging as expected. I have pf2snort installed and
it seems to be working ok. I have portscans logging to portscan.log so I could
just log the portscans to the alert file so snort2pf can see it I'll be super
happy.

Regards,
Dain Bentley

-Original Message-
From: Markus Lude [markus.l...@gmx.de]
Received: Sunday, 09 Sep 2012, 9:52am
To: misc@openbsd.org [misc@openbsd.org]
Subject: Re: Snort not logging to alerts files

On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:54:07AM -0400, Bentley, Dain wrote:
 Hello Misc,
 I've installed Snort on OpenBSD 4.9 from source and everything installed
 fine.
 When I configure the following rules I see alerts generated:

 # cat /etc/snort/snort.conf
 include /etc/snort/rules/icmp.rules

 # cat /etc/snort/rules/icmp.rules
 alert icmp any any - any any (msg:ICMP Packet; sid:477; rev:3;)

 /usr/local/bin/snort --daq-dir /usr/local/lib/daq -c /etc/snort/snort.conf
-l
 /var/log/snort -i fxp1

 So when I ping the outside interface I get the following in
 /var/log/snort/alert

 [**] [1:477:3] ICMP Packet [**]
 [Priority: 0]
 09/07-10:30:08.599075 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 ICMP TTL:113 TOS:0x20 ID:25441 IpLen:20 DgmLen:28
 Type:8  Code:0  ID:512   Seq:26063  ECHO

 So I now snort can see packets.  Even though I have icmp blocked on the
 outside interface it still logs it.

Why should snort not see them? snort sees packet which arrive at that
interface. Packet filters handle packets later.

 When download and load the snort rules from the snort site nothing happens.
 The logfile sits empty.

What do you expect? Do you have configured snort correctly? Are the
rules you want to fire really enabled?

 Has anyone successfully installed snort on openbsd and logged data?

Of course. Running recent snort on -current.

Recently I send an update of the snort port to ports@. Maybe you could
help test it, so we have a more up-to-date snort version in 5.3.

Regards,
Markus



Re: xenocara not building on amd64-current

2012-09-09 Thread Emilio Perea
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:58:55PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
  I am very grateful for the effort the developers put into the snapshots,
  so I don't mean this as criticism.  But it is possible for somebody
  reading the thread to believe that the latest snapshot would allow
  xenocara to build.  As far as I can tell, it does not (yet) on
  amd64.
 
 Afacit, it does build. What error are you getting ? 

Sorry about the delay in responding!  This is what I get:

***
cc -O2 -pipe  -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm 
-I/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/..  -I/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/../libs
-DFVWM_MODULEDIR=\/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fvwm\  -DFVWMRC=\.fvwmrc\  
-DFVWM_CONFIGDIR=\/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fvwm\ -c 
/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/windows.c
cc   -o fvwm add_window.o bindings.o borders.o builtins.o colormaps.o colors.o 
complex.o decorations.o events.o focus.o functions.o fvwm.o fvwmdebug.o icons.o 
menus.o misc.o modconf.o module.o move.o placement.o read.o resize.o style.o 
virtual.o windows.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/../libs/obj 
-lfvwm -lXpm -lXt -lICE -lSM -lXext -lX11 -lxcb -lXdmcp -lXau
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/X11R6/lib/libfvwm.a(ClientMsg.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can 
not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/X11R6/lib/libfvwm.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm (line 95 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/xenocara/app/fvwm (line 48 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/xenocara/app/fvwm (line 6 of Makefile).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/xenocara/app (line 48 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/xenocara (line 39 of Makefile).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/xenocara (line 32 of Makefile).



Re: xenocara not building on amd64-current

2012-09-09 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 11:56:28PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
  On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:58:55PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote:
   I am very grateful for the effort the developers put into the snapshots,
   so I don't mean this as criticism.  But it is possible for somebody
   reading the thread to believe that the latest snapshot would allow
   xenocara to build.  As far as I can tell, it does not (yet) on
   amd64.
  
  Afacit, it does build. What error are you getting ? 
 
 Sorry about the delay in responding!  This is what I get:
 
 ***
 cc -O2 -pipe  -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm 
 -I/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/..  -I/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/../libs
 -DFVWM_MODULEDIR=\/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fvwm\  -DFVWMRC=\.fvwmrc\  
 -DFVWM_CONFIGDIR=\/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fvwm\ -c 
 /usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/windows.c
 cc   -o fvwm add_window.o bindings.o borders.o builtins.o colormaps.o 
 colors.o complex.o decorations.o events.o focus.o functions.o fvwm.o 
 fvwmdebug.o icons.o menus.o misc.o modconf.o module.o move.o placement.o 
 read.o resize.o style.o virtual.o windows.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib 
 -L/usr/xenocara/app/fvwm/fvwm/../libs/obj -lfvwm -lXpm -lXt -lICE -lSM -lXext 
 -lX11 -lxcb -lXdmcp -lXau
 /usr/bin/ld: /usr/X11R6/lib/libfvwm.a(ClientMsg.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 
 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
 /usr/X11R6/lib/libfvwm.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
 ^^

Where does this library come from ? It's not installed by normal
xenocara builds. Remove it and it should fix your issue.

-- 
Matthieu Herrb