Re: Sorry: Facebook again
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:13:04 + Martin Brandenburg mar...@martinbrandenburg.com wrote: [ ... ] The loopback IP 127.0.0.1 is your computer, so of course the ping response is faster than google.com. Unless you have some proxy web [ ... ] - Martin Hi Martin! My YES - of course. Obviously my thinking was blindfolded by my expectations. To you and the others who gave me the same 'wakup-call': THANK YOU! All the best, STEFAN
Re: Sorry: Facebook again
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2013 um 04:08 Uhr Von: Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net An: Stefan Wollny stefan.wol...@web.de Cc: misc@openbsd.org Betreff: Re: Sorry: Facebook again I wrote up a guide for all you fascists to exercise your power with relayd. Here's the early, unedited version: http://www.nmedia.net/chris/url.blacklist.txt Hi Chris, now this is _really_ impressive: Elegant and powerfull solution and very well written! With my previous question in mind (pf or squid) this seems to be the definitive answer. THANK YOU very much for sharing! Have a nice day, STEFAN
IRC
I have up until now relied on manpages and issues sent upstream though users. This issue on the otherhand has ignited my passion. I have never been more galvanized or stirred with passion until tonight. At this very moment I am filled with rage, on the other hand I realize the fault is not grasped within my accusers realm. Had it been I would be continually working in silence and vocally supporting OpenBSD, however at this time I've not only been accused as a liar amongst my peers but labeled as someone that is not me. That I cannot or shall not tolerate. That being said. I am sure han is reading this and rest assured I am not this man you fingered me as to be. You see I raised and taught to have integrety and honor with everything I do - although at time I deviate this but this is far from the person you accuse me of being. You'll have to forgive me for raising shitstorm in #freenode but nothing on this earth will ever incite such anger then someone calling me a liar. tls.
IRC
I have up until now relied on manpages and issues sent upstream though users. This issue on the otherhand has ignited my passion. I have never been more galvanized or stirred with passion until tonight. At this very moment I am filled with rage, on the other hand I realize the fault is not grasped within my accusers realm. Had it been I would be continually working in silence and vocally supporting OpenBSD, however at this time I've not only been accused as a liar amongst my peers but labeled as someone that is not me. That I cannot or shall not tolerate. That being said. I am sure han is reading this and rest assured I am not this man you fingered me as to be. You see I raised and taught to have integrety and honor with everything I do - although at time I deviate this but this is far from the person you accuse me of being. You'll have to forgive me for raising shitstorm in #freenode but nothing on this earth will ever incite such anger then someone calling me a liar.
Re: IRC
Just for the record: the freenode #openbsd irc channel isn't the official irc channel of the OpenBSD project. We don't care about what happens there. -- jca | PGP: 0x06A11494 / 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
Re: IRC
raging about it only makes you look defensive. If someone accuses you of lying, ask them to present real facts to back up the assertion. If they can't, then you don't have to do a thing (they are already made foolish enough). Besides, anyone who really knows you will dismiss the accusations without any further thought. I had to learn this lesson the hard way about 2 decades ago. anyway, NUFF said. On Oct 22, 2013, at 7:16 AM, tls wrote: I have up until now relied on manpages and issues sent upstream though users. This issue on the otherhand has ignited my passion. I have never been more galvanized or stirred with passion until tonight. At this very moment I am filled with rage, on the other hand I realize the fault is not grasped within my accusers realm. Had it been I would be continually working in silence and vocally supporting OpenBSD, however at this time I've not only been accused as a liar amongst my peers but labeled as someone that is not me. That I cannot or shall not tolerate. That being said. I am sure han is reading this and rest assured I am not this man you fingered me as to be. You see I raised and taught to have integrety and honor with everything I do - although at time I deviate this but this is far from the person you accuse me of being. You'll have to forgive me for raising shitstorm in #freenode but nothing on this earth will ever incite such anger then someone calling me a liar.
urtw0: works on amd64/i386, not on macppc
Hello! While playing with some old USB wireless NICs, I've discovered an interesting problem: two different urtw0 adapters successfully attach on i386, amd64, and macppc (all running 5.3-RELEASE) but only successfully detect networks on amd64 and i386. I know from ancient history that the Realtek chips are not well-liked, but thought this architecture difference might pique someone's interest. (I also popped 'em into a sparc64 machine for the heck of it, but both attached as ugen0.) Apologies in advance for the length; I'm supplying dmesg and ifconfig urtw0 scan while in debug mode for each of the adapters on each architecture. If there's any other information I can supply, please let me know; I can also test patches on any of these machines. Finally, I'd also be happy to drop one of the adapters in the mail to a developer who'd be willing to look at it. Massive data dump follows: === macppc dmesg [ using 501268 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ] console out [ATY,RockHopper2_A]console in [] , no keyboard attached, trying usb anyway using parent ATY,RockHopper2Paren:: memaddr 9800 size 800, : consaddr 9c008000, : ioaddr 9002, size 2: memtag 8000, iotag 8000: width 800 linebytes 1024 height 600 depth 8 Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 1995-2013 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.org OpenBSD 5.3 (GENERIC) #36: Tue Mar 12 20:52:24 MDT 2013 dera...@macppc.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/macppc/compile/GENERIC real mem = 536870912 (512MB) avail mem = 508674048 (485MB) mainbus0 at root: model PowerMac10,1 cpu0 at mainbus0: 7447A (Revision 0x102): 1249 MHz: 512KB L2 cache mem0 at mainbus0 spdmem0 at mem0: 512MB DDR SDRAM non-parity PC3200CL3.0 memc0 at mainbus0: uni-n rev 0xd2 hw-clock at memc0 not configured kiic0 at memc0 offset 0xf8001000 iic0 at kiic0 mpcpcibr0 at mainbus0 pci: uni-north pci0 at mpcpcibr0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 Apple UniNorth AGP rev 0x00 appleagp0 at pchb0 agp0 at appleagp0: aperture at 0x0, size 0x1000 vgafb0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 ATI Radeon 9200 rev 0x01, mmio wsdisplay0 at vgafb0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation) mpcpcibr1 at mainbus0 pci: uni-north pci1 at mpcpcibr1 bus 0 pchb1 at pci1 dev 11 function 0 Apple UniNorth PCI rev 0x00 macobio0 at pci1 dev 23 function 0 Apple Intrepid rev 0x00 openpic0 at macobio0 offset 0x4: version 0x4614 feature 3f0302 LE macgpio0 at macobio0 offset 0x50 modem-reset at macgpio0 offset 0x1d not configured modem-power at macgpio0 offset 0x1c not configured macgpio1 at macgpio0 offset 0x9 irq 47 programmer-switch at macgpio0 offset 0x11 not configured gpio5 at macgpio0 offset 0x6f not configured gpio6 at macgpio0 offset 0x70 not configured extint-gpio15 at macgpio0 offset 0x67 not configured escc-legacy at macobio0 offset 0x12000 not configured zsc0 at macobio0 offset 0x13000: irq 22,23 zstty0 at zsc0 channel 0 zstty1 at zsc0 channel 1 aoa0 at macobio0 offset 0x1: irq 30,1,2 audio0 at aoa0 timer at macobio0 offset 0x15000 not configured adb0 at macobio0 offset 0x16000 irq 25: via-pmu, 0 targets apm0 at adb0: battery flags 0x0, 0% charged piic0 at adb0 iic1 at piic0 maxtmp0 at iic1 addr 0xc8: max6642 kiic1 at macobio0 offset 0x18000 iic2 at kiic1 wdc0 at macobio0 offset 0x2 irq 24: DMA ohci0 at pci1 dev 24 function 0 Apple Intrepid USB rev 0x00: couldn't map interrupt ohci1 at pci1 dev 25 function 0 Apple Intrepid USB rev 0x00: couldn't map interrupt ohci2 at pci1 dev 26 function 0 Apple Intrepid USB rev 0x00: irq 29, version 1.0, legacy support ohci3 at pci1 dev 27 function 0 NEC USB rev 0x43: irq 63, version 1.0 ohci4 at pci1 dev 27 function 1 NEC USB rev 0x43: irq 63, version 1.0 ehci0 at pci1 dev 27 function 2 NEC USB rev 0x04: irq 63 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 NEC EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 usb1 at ohci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 Apple OHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1 usb2 at ohci3: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 NEC OHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1 usb3 at ohci4: USB revision 1.0 uhub3 at usb3 NEC OHCI root hub rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1 mpcpcibr2 at mainbus0 pci: uni-north pci2 at mpcpcibr2 bus 0 pchb2 at pci2 dev 11 function 0 Apple UniNorth PCI rev 0x00 kauaiata0 at pci2 dev 13 function 0 Apple Intrepid ATA rev 0x00 wdc1 at kauaiata0 irq 39: DMA wd0 at wdc1 channel 0 drive 0: ST940110A wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 38154MB, 78140160 sectors atapiscsi0 at wdc1 channel 0 drive 1 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: MATSHITA, CD-RW CW-8124, DACD ATAPI 5/cdrom removable wd0(wdc1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 2 cd0(wdc1:0:1): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 2 Apple UniNorth Firewire rev 0x81 at pci2 dev 14 function 0 not configured gem0 at pci2 dev 15 function 0 Apple Uni-N2 GMAC rev 0x80: irq 41, address 00:11:24:3e:ab:ce bmtphy0 at gem0 phy 0: BCM5221 100baseTX PHY, rev. 4 vscsi0 at root scsibus1 at
Re: Lanner or Soekris?
On 2013-10-21, emigrant emig...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, Soekris net6501-70( http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html ) or Lanner FW-7541( http://www.lannerinc.com/products/x86-network-appliances/desktop/fw-7541 ). OK, simple question, what's better?:) Price is almost the same. In my opinion Soekris is a little bit obsolete. My requirements: small, home router/server, fanless: pf(altq+hfsc) for ~15 hosts, carp+pfsync, nat, named, www, samba, ftp, UniFi Controller(jre+mongod), pfstat, ipfm, pf logs, SSD(CF is too slow). Hmm, Lanner looks better, 6xNIC, 1xrj45 console port, newer hardware, memory(ddr3) upgradable(i think so?), dual core Atom 64bit, all ports on front. Soekris, maybe more professional product? Any suggestions? Axiomtek NA-320FL is another option. Note that the mongodb port is currently broken (and has been since 5.3-ish iirc).
During install MacBookAir5,2 screen goes blank, need external monitor
Hi, It's doesn't seem to be possible to use the screen on the MacBook Air to install OpenBSD. While the screen works initially, by the time you have reached the choosing disk sets to install, the screen will go blank. Connecting an external monitor to the thunderbolt port can prolong the process so that you install completes, the laptop screen will function as normal in X11 when booted from the stock bsd.mp kernel. I need to double check if the issue still occurs without X11 on a stock kernel. Is this a known issue if so is there any way not requiring a external monitor?? Sevan / Venture37
Apple keyboard backlight
Hello again, Is it possible to utilise the keyboard backlight found on Apple laptops with OpenBSD? Specifically the MacBookAir5,2 if that makes a difference. Sevan / Venture37
Re: During install MacBookAir5,2 screen goes blank, need external monitor
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:41:55AM +0400, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: Hi, It's doesn't seem to be possible to use the screen on the MacBook Air to install OpenBSD. While the screen works initially, by the time you have reached the choosing disk sets to install, the screen will go blank. I have a similar problem. On my computer (a MacBook Pro), the screen goes blank at the boot prompt. Sometimes it flashes, but is always gone before I can do anything. I asked another person on this list who has the same model as me, but he reported having no trouble. For a while I thought that the problem was unique to my computer, but then the motherboard was replaced, and the new motherboard suffered the same problems. Considering the internal layout of Apple's computers, I can't see what other component would be responsible. Connecting an external monitor to the thunderbolt port can prolong the process so that you install completes, the laptop screen will function as normal in X11 when booted from the stock bsd.mp kernel. I didn't know that, thanks. Perhaps it will be useful in the future. I need to double check if the issue still occurs without X11 on a stock kernel. Is this a known issue if so is there any way not requiring a external monitor?? On 5.4 and -current, there is inteldrm support which covers the machine under regular usage. I am using it now. However, the install kernel does not support inteldrm, so I installed using a second computer and then transplanted the disk. - Martin
fresh checkout of tagged 5.4 FTBFS
Is it not supposed to be possible to build a checkout of tagged 5.4 source from 5.3-stable? === ../kerberosV/lib/libasn1 compile_et /usr/src/kerberosV/lib/libasn1/../../../kerberosV/src/lib/asn1/asn1_err.et asn1_compile --one-code-file --preserve-binary=TBSCertificate --preserve-binary=TBSCRLCertList --preserve-binary=Name --sequence=GeneralNames --sequence=Extensions --sequence=CRLDistributionPoints /usr/src/kerberosV/lib/libasn1/../../../kerberosV/src/lib/asn1/rfc2459.asn1 rfc2459_asn1 Usage: asn1_compile [--version] [--help] [asn1-file [name]] *** Error 1 in kerberosV/lib/libasn1 (Makefile:53 'asn1_rfc2459_asn1.x') *** Error 1 in kerberosV/lib (bsd.subdir.mk:48 'depend') *** Error 1 in lib (bsd.subdir.mk:48 'depend') *** Error 1 in /usr/src (Makefile:86 'build') 1m5.68s real 0m6.40s user 0m8.22s system -- Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com
Re: fresh checkout of tagged 5.4 FTBFS
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com wrote: Is it not supposed to be possible to build a checkout of tagged 5.4 source from 5.3-stable? No, it's not required. If you want to build from source, read the FAQ.
Re: Blocking facebook.com: PF or squid?
host file its good but does not stop web proxy's From: stefan.wol...@web.de To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking facebook.com: PF or squid? Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:26:57 +0200 Hi Sico! Hi list! [stuff deleted for brevity] I am in a similar situation (squid at home) and I simply have a blacklist with lines like these: doubleclick facebook scorecardresearch Works like a charm for me, and no need to look up IP address blocks or anything like that. And since I am the only user here there's no collateral damage. ;-) Well: I am personally liable for what leaves my network so this kind of 'collateral damage' is what I intentionally try to achieve :-) (see the reply to myself a few minutes ago) Uhm, squid only filters incoming traffice... Doesn't this actually answer my original question: If only incoming traffic is filtered by squid stealth outflows towards FB is not catched by the proxy. Obviously then only PF serves my needs for a reason. May I ask a follow-up question: Did you set up the blacklist within squid.conf or did you reference to a separate file? A bit of both really, I use a seperate file and reference it in squid.conf: sico@siem2:~grep blacklist /etc/squid/squid.conf acl blacklist url_regex /etc/squid/blacklist.acl http_access deny blacklist sico@siem2:~ Thanks for this. This brings an idea to me: I will try this with the full list of 'nasty addresses' from http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm. Shouldn't this then have the same effect on all clients served by the squid-server as if I'd go around and update the individual hosts-files? The url_regex allows me to specify facebook instead of facebook.com etc. That is good to know! CU, Sico. Thanks again and have a nice week, STEFAN
Re: fresh checkout of tagged 5.4 FTBFS
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:23:19 -0500 Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com wrote: | Is it not supposed to be possible to build a checkout of tagged 5.4 | source from 5.3-stable? | Not usually, the differences are too great (apart from the changes between -release and -stable, there is about a 6 months development cycle in between). If you want 5.4, either order the CD sets (+ help support OpenBSD) or wait until the release in November and download the iso. Brett.
Re: Thinkpad R61 does not fully resume
On Oct 22 14:25:33, mlar...@azathoth.net wrote: Not sure if someone else already replied, but this: vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x0429 rev 0xa1 is your problem. We don't resume NVIDIA cards. We don't know how, and NVIDIA won't tell us how. Thank you for the insight. does that also influence the NIC not comming back up? Jan On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:13:35PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: With the latest i386 snapshot, my Lenovo R61 suspends, but does not fully resume. The behaviour was the same with the previous snapshot. After apm -S (or closing the lid) and then Fn+F4 (or opening the lid) I can see the disk and power leds blinking as if comming back up, but the screen stays black, and the machine is not remotely accessible. I haven't tried yet whether wifi or USB come back up. However, typing 'halt -p' blindly at the black console shuts the machine down correctly. See the dmesg below; acpidump here: http://stare.cz/dmesg/lenovoR61.tar What can I do to help OpenBSD better support this? Thank you Jan OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #70: Tue Oct 1 12:57:28 MDT 2013 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 799 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,NXE,LONG,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,LAHF,PERF real mem = 1071894528 (1022MB) avail mem = 1042628608 (994MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 08/27/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfdc70, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe0010 (71 entries) bios0: vendor LENOVO version 7KET72WW (1.22 ) date 08/27/2007 bios0: LENOVO 8918B8G acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT ECDT TCPA APIC MCFG HPET SLIC BOOT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices LID_(S3) SLPB(S3) LURT(S3) DURT(S3) IGBE(S4) EXP0(S4) EXP1(S4) EXP2(S4) EXP3(S4) EXP4(S4) PCI1(S4) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB3(S3) USB4(S3) [...] acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpiec0 at acpi0 acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 199MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7250 @ 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2 GHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,NXE,LONG,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,LAHF,PERF ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 1 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 2, remapped to apid 1 acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xf000, bus 0-63 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (AGP_) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP0) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 3 (EXP1) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (EXP2) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 5 (EXP3) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 13 (EXP4) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 21 (PCI1) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2, C1, PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3, C2, C1, PSS acpipwrres0 at acpi0: PUBS acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature is 127 degC acpitz1 at acpi0: critical temperature is 100 degC acpibtn0 at acpi0: LID_ acpibtn1 at acpi0: SLPB acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 model COMPATIBLE serial 13920 type LION oem SANYO acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1 not present acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit offline acpithinkpad0 at acpi0 acpidock0 at acpi0: GDCK not docked (0) bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xf000 0xcf000/0x1000 0xd/0x1000 0xe/0x1! cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1995 MHz: speeds: 2001, 2000, 1600, 1200, 800 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel GM965 Host rev 0x0c ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel GM965 PCIE rev 0x0c: apic 1 int 16 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x0429 rev 0xa1 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 Intel ICH8 IGP M rev 0x03: msi, address 00:1a:6b:d4:5f:22 uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 20 uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 21 ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 22 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801H HD Audio rev 0x03: msi azalia0: codecs: Analog Devices AD1984, Conexant/0x2bfa, using Analog Devices AD1984 audio0 at azalia0 ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801H PCIE rev 0x03: apic 1 int 20 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 Intel 82801H PCIE rev
