El dom, 22-10-2006 a las 12:40 +0200, Steffen Wendzel escribis: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > : So this is like an insecure version of SSH? > > it has nothing todo with SSH. And of course it isn't very secure > BUT it adds security where normaly no security is, thats the point. > > You normaly have different open ports, but with this tool you can > open/close them on demand. This is at least a little bit more secure > than to have them open all the time. ?why? If you have a security problem with a service, the only "more secure" action is to fix it, don't to open it eventually. Regards -- .-------------------------. | Inigo Tejedor Arrondo | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | '-------------------------'
