Re: firefox-18.0p0 segmentation faulting after upgrade to current
* Robert Connolly [2013-01-21 20:37:39 -0800]:
> On 01/21/13 15:45, OpenBSD wrote:
> >Hi Misc,
> >
> >I've just upgraded to -current (OpenBSD 5.2-current (GENERIC) #17: Fri
> >Jan 18 19:42:57 MST 2013) dmesg at [2] from the Jan 11 snapshot and
> >done a pkg_add -vui.
> >
> >But when I start firefox[1] now it opens the window but shortly
> >afterwards core dumps.
> >
> >I'm sure this is an issue with my system, getting out of sync - but I
> >would like some clues to debugging this further as normally moving to
> >the latest snapshot and doing a pkg_add -vui works flawlessly...
> >
> >I'll hopefully get round to a clean install in the next day or so, but
> >in the mean time any clue bats gratefully received :~)
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Fred
> >
> >[1]
> >x41:fred ~> firefox --version
> >Mozilla Firefox 18.0
> >x41:fred ~> pkg_info -c firefox-18.0p0
> >Information for inst:firefox-18.0p0
> >
> >Comment:
> >Mozilla web browser
> >
> >[2] dmesg
> >OpenBSD 5.2-current (GENERIC) #17: Fri Jan 18 19:42:57 MST 2013
> >t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
> >cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel"
> >686-class) 1.60 GHz
>
> I just upgraded to the same snapshot as you, except I'm on amd64,
> and Firefox works fine for me.
I can confirm I upgraded to the same snapshot and firefox 18 is also working
well for me on amd64
--
Primary Key: 4096R/1D31DC38 2011-12-03
Key Fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
Re: unable to build -current from 5.2 beta
* Ivo Chutkin [2013-01-20 15:43:22 +0200]: > Hello, > I am trying to build -current from 5.2 beta from Jul 1 but getting Yes, the recommended way and documented way to upgrade to current is to download the latest snapshot. I persoanlly, as i'm sure many others do also, boot from bsd.rd. So open an ftp session to a local mirror, making sure it's the "snapshot" directory, copy *.tgz files and bsd* - I also download INSTALL.amd64 and SHA files; copy bsd.rc to / : cp /path/to/snapshot/files/download/bsd.rd / then reboot the machine and enter `boot bsd.rc` at the boot prompt and select upgrade. When it asks for the location of the file sets select disk and enter the path to the files you downloaded using the ftp session. Then once it's finished, update the system configuration files using sysmerge(8). There's lots of info on the OpenBSD website and contributors have written some good tutorials also.
Re: named error from /var/named/etc/root.hint
* Stuart Henderson [2013-01-14 10:54:30 +]: > On 2013-01-14, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > > Hi > > > > I recently upgraded my system to the Dec 21 snapshot, will be updating > > again to the Jan 09 snapshot; but, I noticed an error message in > > /var/log/messages yesterday when I rebooted my machine: > > > > > > Jan 13 21:16:43 kontrol named[23666]: checkhints: d.root-servers.net/A > > (199.7.91.13) missing from hints > > Jan 13 21:16:43 kontrol named[23666]: checkhints: d.root-servers.net/A > > (128.8.10.90) extra record in hints > > > > I managed to fix it by downloading a new file from > > ftp://ftp.internic.net/domain/named.cache and copying it to > > /var/named/etc/root.hints. > > > > I Just thought I would post that in case anyone else has/had the same issue. > > > > Cheers, Jamie > > > > > > This would get updated when you run sysmerge against newer sources > or a newer etc52.tgz. I did run sysmerge(8) after the upgrade as documented. It must have been something I did wrong then. Sorry for that. Jamie -- Primary Key: 4096R/1D31DC38 2011-12-03 Key Fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
named error from /var/named/etc/root.hint
Hi I recently upgraded my system to the Dec 21 snapshot, will be updating again to the Jan 09 snapshot; but, I noticed an error message in /var/log/messages yesterday when I rebooted my machine: Jan 13 21:16:43 kontrol named[23666]: checkhints: d.root-servers.net/A (199.7.91.13) missing from hints Jan 13 21:16:43 kontrol named[23666]: checkhints: d.root-servers.net/A (128.8.10.90) extra record in hints I managed to fix it by downloading a new file from ftp://ftp.internic.net/domain/named.cache and copying it to /var/named/etc/root.hints. I Just thought I would post that in case anyone else has/had the same issue. Cheers, Jamie -- Primary Key: 4096R/1D31DC38 2011-12-03 Key Fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
Re: Terminal emulators can't read .profile
* MERIGHI Marcus [2012-12-10 12:48:26 +0100]: > f...@zhou.es (Feng Zhou), 2012.12.10 (Mon) 12:02 (CET): > > I was trying out st and urxvt as a replacement for xterm, and it > > turned out that all the settings I put in ~/.profile are not > > recognised when I use either st or urxvt. > > > > Is this a bug or an expected behaviour that I need to do something > > about to use other terminals? The shell was not changed, it was the > > default ksh. At first I thought it was a problem of st, but it > > happened to urxvt too. So I thought it's best to ask here. Any help is > > much appreciated. > > I am guessing here, but from the times I used rxvt there's still: > > Rxvt*loginShell: TRUE > > in my .Xdefaults. > > Bye, Marcus I use urxvt with cwm. You need to to use the ~/.Xdefaults file as others have suggested: URxvt.loginShell:true ... This will solve your problem. BTW, it's documented on the FAQ I believe. Jamie
Re: spammers getting less stupid?
/ Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 16:02:06 -0400 / > Jan Stary wrote: > > >Strangely, the only occurence of 2.139.201.210 in the last month's > >maillog is just this; that's half an hour after it got WHITE. > >What happend at Mon Oct 29 14:49:24 CET 2012 that made it WHITE? > > >Anyway, it seems (some) spambots got less demented and actually do > >resend, getting themselves whitelisted - thus working themselves > >around the whole premise of greylisting. > > >Are people seeing something similar? > > I'm seeing it. I recently tweaked my greyscanner settings to pick > up some spammers getting through who shouldn't (they were staying > just under the threshold for further scrutiny). But I've still been > getting a couple a day, and they only just got themselves > whitelisted. So, you are not alone... > > --Kurt Yep, me too. It's constant battle. I spend quite a bit of time looking through logs for ip's to block.
Re: Upgrade to 5.2?
/ Anders Trobäck wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 9:40:43 +0100 / > Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:34:50 +0100 > skrev Anders Trobäck : > > > Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:11:26 +0000 > > skrev Jamie Paul Griffin : > > > > > / Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 / > > > > > > > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth > > > > becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're > > > > planning on reinstalling anyway. I think you'll be pleasantly > > > > surprised! > > > > > > Just out of curiosity, do you think the easiest method is to use the > > > bds.rd method or should I use a CD to do the upgrade, is one method > > > preferred or easier over the other? > > > > I always (well almost, I have some systems where I do the tar thing) > > use bsd.rd and it has worked perfect for me every time so far! I > > don't know if it's the official preferred way but it's the way I > > prefer!:-) > > Don't forget to buy something else or donate to support the project;-) Absolutely. I am a CS student so funds currently are a bit limited but having used the OS for a short time, I love it and will certainly make a donation ASAP. My favourite OS by far which reads a bit arse-licky but so what. I'd be happy to support a project like this. Thanks for the help. Jamie
Re: Upgrade to 5.2?
/ Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 / > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth > becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're > planning on reinstalling anyway. I think you'll be pleasantly > surprised! Just out of curiosity, do you think the easiest method is to use the bds.rd method or should I use a CD to do the upgrade, is one method preferred or easier over the other?
Re: Upgrade to 5.2?
/ Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 / > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth > becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're > planning on reinstalling anyway. I think you'll be pleasantly > surprised! > > For a long time I did fresh installs too since my average OpenBSD > box is a router with ~15 files changed from default and little to no > packages so it was trivial to recreate, and even then I should have > been upgrading in hindsight. Yeah sure i'll give it go. It would make life a bit easier anyway if all goes to plan. Thanks for your comments. Jamie
Re: Upgrade to 5.2?
/ Stuart Henderson wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 15:56:31 + / > On 2012-10-31, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > > Is it best to > > remove all packages prior to upgrade and then reinstall them or > > should we simply upgrade the packges using pkg_add -i once the > > upgrade has been completed? > > pkg_add -u - package upgrades have been pretty reliable for years now. yeah i meant the -u switch, that was a typo (sorry). I've just read the upgrade document and as I don't have that many packages installed I think i'll just back-up some config files and install from scratch. Probably the easiest and quickest method in my case. cheers, Jamie
Re: Upgrade to 5.2?
/ Nick Holland wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 7:03:48 -0400 / > On 10/31/12 00:13, Daniel Melameth wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Matt M. wrote: > >> Yesterday I upgraded from 5.1-release to -current. Is there any need to > >> upgrade to 5.2-release? Could this cause issues since -current is really > >> newer than what's on the 5.2 media? > > > > You are now running bleeding edge software/what will evolve and become > > 5.3. "Upgrading" this machine to 5.2 will actually be a downgrade and > > this is unsupported. > > > > exactly. > Please read the start of http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html > > Nick. Will the 5.2 downloads be available tomorrow? I read 1 Nov is the release date for 5.2. I will be doing my first OpenBSD upgrade as i've only been using the OS for a few weeks now. Is it best to remove all packages prior to upgrade and then reinstall them or should we simply upgrade the packges using pkg_add -i once the upgrade has been completed? (Ihave read the documentation on the website, but just for clarity I thought i'd ask on list.) Jamie.
Re: Donations
> But things are not free. It takes commerce to produce nearly every > material good, as distasteful as that might be to some people. It > is called business. No one is forcing anyone to use ebay or paypal. > If anyone wants to play in their marketplace, however, they must > play by the established rules. of course all things are not free, we're not bloody idiots. the point is their charges, in my opion, are excessive.
Re: Donations
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 04:38:09PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote: > On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > > > > On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > > I agree totally that there are a lot of idiots running parts of the US > > > system, but at least they ARE predictable. > > > > Being predictable is just not enough. Hardly You would enjoy predictability > > of > > You being put to prison on suspection of possibility of You committing some > > crime. > > > Actually, being predictable ALLOWS planning to avoid such problems! > > Ever head of Don Quixote? The moral of the storey - pick the battles you > have a chance of winning and avoid the rest. > > Lee > if nothing else think about the charges they put on every transaction: you sell something on ebay, they charge you; you process their payment through paypal (ebay) they charge you again. they're clearly ripping us all us all off - fact! and to top it all of the charges have become extortionate.
Re: suggestion for a new/additional OpenBSD release media option
> So you want someone to maintain a Wim blacklist, and drop emails from him as > soon as they break the annoying threshold? I was merely making a point. -- Jamie Paul Griffin
Re: suggestion for a new/additional OpenBSD release media option
> Everytime one of you write to Theo directly, > I feel like I'm watching gay porn. would someone please block this prick. it was funny to start with but now it's intensely annoying. -- Jamie Paul Griffin
Re: (mailx) How can I alter "From" header
> I am in trouble making sendmail actually read > /etc/mail/genericstable.db: setting > > FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/mailnames')dnl > FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope')dnl > > in mc file and compiling it doesn't help and I can't find out, why so. When it comes to using Sendmail features the only thing you can do is spend time reading about them. There is lot's of information out there. It is quite a complex system which requires a certain level of understanding. Besides, we can only guess what your logs say and if/what the errors you're experiencing are. -- Jamie Paul Griffin GPG Key: DF52D9B0 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
Re: (mailx) How can I alter "From" header
> For a global change in Gmail: > Settings > Accounts and Import > Send mail as: > edit info > > Otherwise add different accounts and send as them (although smtp > authentication will be via the username and not the added accounts). > Google Apps makes this more flexible as you can alias users. I don't think that's what he's looking for. There are command-line mailers that are better suited to changing the From: header, otherwise If you really want to use mail(1) then i think your best option is to look at using the mta to re-write the From: addressi as suggested earlier, which is typically sendmail, otherwise the closest thing you can get to it is by using the -r option (i think). -- Jamie Paul Griffin GPG Key: DF52D9B0 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
