Re: Kernel trap with custom ramdisk

2008-04-28 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 00:28:11 B A wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to build custom kernel+ramdisk for my router.
> But I'm getting:
>
> panic: pmap_enter: missing kernel PTP!
> Stopped at 0x0d47ba08: leave
>
> Any ideas what I did wrong?

You tried building a custom ramdisk and then came to misc asking
for help despite the archives are full of detailed instructions telling
you NOT TO DO THAT.


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M

2008-04-27 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Sunday 27 April 2008 15:23:16 Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> > I talked with the nvidia guy and he assured me that there is no way
> >  that they'll fix this in the open source driver.
>
> that's rather horrendous..
> anymore info on this? Was he referring to the nv developers from being
> able to "figure out" the magick? or that his nVidia people were
> unwilling to intervene? both?
>
> so frustrating..
>
> thanks for sharing!
>
> regards,
> ~Jason

Jason,

This is really not an interesting or relevant discussion.
He's expressed nVidias unwillingness to deal w/ the issues in the drivers and
we know from before that nVidia will not give us docs.

So they deserve only be ignored, both on mailinglists and by you who are 
considering getting a new graphics card or computer.

So let's kill this discussion off by concluding that when you buy a new 
computer or graphics card you should get it with other graphics then Nvidia.


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: HP DL140

2008-04-09 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 10:54:57 Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> Anyone had any truck installing OpenBSD on an HP DL140? I have tried
> several times and it just hangs after uncompressing the kernel, right
> before the copyright message from the kernel.
>
> Anyone know the magic cockerel wave to get them to boot?
>
> (Note, using 4.2 release)
>
> Thanks.
>
>  -- joe.
>
> He has this massive ashtray that's like an Aladdin's lamp.

If an old release doesn't work, please always try a snapshot before
asking for help with it.
It is likely that whatever problem there might be has already been fixed in 
the snapshots.


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: Intel Core2 Dual/Quad - i386 or amd64?

2008-03-28 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 12:08:35 Alexander Hall wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
> >>>
>  wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG"
> >>>
> >>> is not supported in OpenBSD/amd64.  See
> >>>
> >>>  http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
> >
> > That is not true.  Both wpi(4) and iwn(4) are in amd64 GENERIC.
> > The web page needs an update though.
>
> Ok, I thought it seemed a little strange, but who was I to question the
> docs? :)
>
> Thanks for the update.


I have corrected this, http://www.openbsd.org/{i386,amd64}.html should now 
correctly reflect what each arch can do wrt Intel wirless.


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: the death of the oldest OpenBSD system on the net...

2008-03-17 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Monday 17 March 2008 22:12:05 you wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > back in time (but not to long ago), I served 3000 email accounts for
> > a Swiss multinational insurance company on a P133 with 32MB RAM.
> >
> > That is no big deal, however.  sendmail and any Unix like system
> > can handle that without problem.
>
> Until a few years back, all the emails for one of the most widely
> recognized global brands went through 3 gateway servers (think 250k
> employees, and a whole bunch of automatic notification emails) that were
> freebsd, sendmail, and either dual ppro 200mhz or dual P2-400mhz.
>
> softdep really helped them out :)

Nice!
Got any more _freebsd_ success stories for [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OpenBSD with pf on a mini-ITX?

2008-03-11 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 18:57:41 you wrote:
> Hi all,
> Have anyone tried to run OpenBSD with pf on a Jetway J7F2 (or similar)
> motherboard to act as a firewall and do NAT?
>
> Any inputs will be welcome! Thanks,


I'm using one of those jetway mini-itxes as firewall (dmesg below).
It works ok but you have to be very carefull and update the bios or else
it may not work at all, as is evident from PR 5641.


Regards
Johan M:son

OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC) #657: Mon Feb 11 19:17:03 MST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: VIA Esther processor 1500MHz ("CentaurHauls" 686-class) 1.51 GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,SBF,SSE3,EST,TM2
cpu0: RNG AES AES-CTR SHA1 SHA256 RSA
real mem  = 1055354880 (1006MB)
avail mem = 1012531200 (965MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 10/22/07, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfa1b0, SMBIOS 
rev. 2.3 @ 0xf (33 entries)
bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies, LTD version "6.00 PG" date 10/22/2007
apm at bios0 function 0x15 not configured
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC
acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB3(S3) USB4(S3) 
USB5(S3) USB6(S3) USB7(S3) AC97(S5) UAR1(S5)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2, FVS, 1500, 800 MHz
acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature 70 degC
acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x1 0xd/0x1800
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "VIA CN700 Host" rev 0x00
agp0 at pchb0: v3, aperture at 0xf800, size 0xe80
pchb1 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 "VIA CN700 Host" rev 0x00
pchb2 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 "VIA CN700 Host" rev 0x00
pchb3 at pci0 dev 0 function 3 "VIA PT890 Host" rev 0x00
pchb4 at pci0 dev 0 function 4 "VIA CN700 Host" rev 0x00
pchb5 at pci0 dev 0 function 7 "VIA CN700 Host" rev 0x00
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "VIA VT8377 AGP" rev 0x00
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "VIA S3 Unichrome PRO IGP" rev 0x01
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
em0 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546EB)" rev 0x01: irq 11, 
address 00:11:0a:5c:9d:f4
em1 at pci0 dev 8 function 1 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82546EB)" rev 0x01: irq 10, 
address 00:11:0a:5c:9d:f5
re0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 "Realtek 8169SC" rev 0x10: RTL8169/8110SCd 
(0x1800), irq 10, address 00:30:18:a4:e3:0c
rgephy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S PHY, rev. 2
re1 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Realtek 8169SC" rev 0x10: RTL8169/8110SCd 
(0x1800), irq 5, address 00:30:18:a4:e3:0d
rgephy1 at re1 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S PHY, rev. 2
pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "VIA VT6420 SATA" rev 0x80: DMA
pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt
pciide1 at pci0 dev 15 function 1 "VIA VT82C571 IDE" rev 0x06: ATA133, channel 
0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: 
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 38154MB, 78140160 sectors
wd0(pciide1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5
pciide1: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
uhci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 11
uhci1 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 11
uhci2 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 11
uhci3 at pci0 dev 16 function 3 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 11
ehci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 4 "VIA VT6202 USB" rev 0x86: irq 10
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 "VIA EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
viapm0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "VIA VT8237 ISA" rev 0x00
iic0 at viapm0
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 1GB DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC2-4200CL5
auvia0 at pci0 dev 17 function 5 "VIA VT8233 AC97" rev 0x60: irq 10
ac97: codec id 0x414c4760 (Avance Logic ALC655 rev 0)
audio0 at auvia0
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 "VIA UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 "VIA UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 "VIA UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb4 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
uhub4 at usb4 "VIA UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at mainbus0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
midi0 at pcppi0: 
spkr0 at pcppi0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom0: console
pccom1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
pccom1: probed fifo depth: 15 bytes
biomask fdc5 netmask fde5 ttymask ffe7
softraid0 at root
root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b



Re: high load irq trouble

2008-02-06 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
1. Supply dmesg, we're not playing guessing games
2. This HW is known to have interrupt issues similar to what is described in 
PR 5707, so if you are runing -current snapshot on the box, try disabling all
the acpi bells and whistles and things should improve substantially.


Regards
Johan M:son

On Wednesday 06 February 2008 14:59:25 holger glaess wrote:
> hi
>
> my hardeware are 2 pices of
> hp dl 145 g2 2gb ram and a intel based 1gb quad interfaces card 1 sata hd.
>
> this work as firewall system with 5 carp interfaces with up to 15 ip.
>
> per box are 5 ethernet interfaces active. ( the system have 6 , the quad
> card and 2 on board )
>
> is is possible the the hp box is not possible to do more than 2000
> interupts per irq ? i have in my environment a trougthput per interface
> from 10 to 50Mbit.
>
> if interupts going over 1800 on one interface i get massiv slow downs and
> packet lost.
>
> the rise the net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen to 1024 ( i saw before drops ) .
>
> to solve the problem as hot fix i did a trunk of 2 interfaces for this
> interfaces with highes interrupts load.
>
> top shows me close to 100% interrupts load but less then 1 overall load.
>
> vmstat -i
>
> interrupt   total rate
> irq12/pciide1   627020
> irq11/bge0   84232199  986
> irq10/bge1   11944226  139
> irq7/em0129003925 1510
> irq5/em1 59507109  696
> irq11/em2   134192386 1571
> irq11/em3 5185828   60
> irq1/pckbc0 60
> irq0/clock8539373   99
> irq8/rtc 10930625  128
> Total   443598379 5194
>
>
> it is possible that this hardware to small for this traffic or it is a
> problem from the design of the hp  dl145 g2 ?
>
>
> holger



Re: Pre-Orders for Limited Edition Puffy the Blowfish

2008-01-07 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:41 openbsd puffy wrote:
> I can assure you this is not some email scam from africa, This is a
> completely legitimate offer, and will be funded and shipped from the US.
> Though I am currently travelling in Asia. IF you dont want one you dont
> have to order one. plain and simple.

I get fifty mails a day w/ random people stating that I should _REALLY_ trust
them w/ my bussiness. What is significant is that these people all use gmail, 
yahoo, hotmail or similar anonymous email addresses.
So tell me, why should I believe you, how are you different from them?


Regards
Johan M:son Lindman

> On Jan 7, 2008 5:51 PM, Johan Mson Lindman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Say, mate, where in Lagos Nigeria do I send my money?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Johan M:son Lindman
> >
> > On Monday 07 January 2008 08:57:33 you wrote:
> > > Good Morning,
> > >
> > > In an effort to help support OpenBSD and its masses I am offering
> > > myself
> >
> > to
> >
> > > you as a once-live preserved Puffy the Blowfish in limited quantities.
> > > I am seeking pre-orders to determine the qualifications of the numbers
> >
> > for
> >
> > > the registered limited editions.
> > > I have three types of preserved Puffy the Blowfish.
> > >
> > > Basically I come on a rope in standard form. So I can be hung almost
> > > anywhere you desire.
> > > I also come on a simple beautiful Teak wooden stand.
> > >
> > > My limited edition version is of me preserved in my beautiful Teak and
> > > Glass Fish tank. A perfect geek decoration for any user.
> > > We will only produce a limited quantity of Limited Edition Puffys, with
> > > Registration Number and Certificate.
> > > We are inquiring as to pre-orders to determine number quantity of the
> > > limited edition.
> > >
> > > My measurements range from 3 - 6" in length. and 3-6" in height on a
> >
> > rope.
> >
> > > My measurements range from 3 - 6" in length. and 6-8" in height on a
> >
> > Teak
> >
> > > wooden stand.
> > >
> > > If I am ordered in my fish tank, I am approx. 9"x9"x6", larger tanks
> > > can
> >
> > be
> >
> > > ordered for a small increase in charges.
> > > Remember I was once a fully live living Blowfish, I am now fully
> >
> > preserved
> >
> > > in my puffed size, and do not have a scent.
> > > I can also be custom ordered to your standards, or in quantity. We can
> >
> > also
> >
> > > customize multiple puffys per fish tank.
> > >
> > > Puffy the Blowfish on a rope - 75.00 USD
> > > Puffy the Blowfish on a Teak wooden stand - 95.00 USD
> > > Puffy the Blowfish in a Teak & Glass Fishtank - 135.00 USD
> > > (Quantities Limited, Registration Number & Certificate Included)
> > >
> > > A simple reply stating your willingness to purchase, and which type of
> > > Puffy you would like, will allow us to determine pre-orders
> > > and Limited Edition Quantities. We will then provide an update with
> > > pre-order numbers, time for delivery and payment terms and options.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Puffy the Blowfish
> > >
> > > PS Depending on number of orders taken we will be donating a percentage
> >
> > to
> >
> > > help fund OpenBSD and some of its projects.
> > >
> > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name
> >
> > of
> >
> > > IMG_2302.JPG]
> > >
> > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name
> >
> > of
> >
> > > IMG_2303.JPG]



Re: Pre-Orders for Limited Edition Puffy the Blowfish

2008-01-07 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
Say, mate, where in Lagos Nigeria do I send my money?


Regards
Johan M:son Lindman

On Monday 07 January 2008 08:57:33 you wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> In an effort to help support OpenBSD and its masses I am offering myself to
> you as a once-live preserved Puffy the Blowfish in limited quantities.
> I am seeking pre-orders to determine the qualifications of the numbers for
> the registered limited editions.
> I have three types of preserved Puffy the Blowfish.
>
> Basically I come on a rope in standard form. So I can be hung almost
> anywhere you desire.
> I also come on a simple beautiful Teak wooden stand.
>
> My limited edition version is of me preserved in my beautiful Teak and
> Glass Fish tank. A perfect geek decoration for any user.
> We will only produce a limited quantity of Limited Edition Puffys, with
> Registration Number and Certificate.
> We are inquiring as to pre-orders to determine number quantity of the
> limited edition.
>
> My measurements range from 3 - 6" in length. and 3-6" in height on a rope.
> My measurements range from 3 - 6" in length. and 6-8" in height on a Teak
> wooden stand.
>
> If I am ordered in my fish tank, I am approx. 9"x9"x6", larger tanks can be
> ordered for a small increase in charges.
> Remember I was once a fully live living Blowfish, I am now fully preserved
> in my puffed size, and do not have a scent.
> I can also be custom ordered to your standards, or in quantity. We can also
> customize multiple puffys per fish tank.
>
> Puffy the Blowfish on a rope - 75.00 USD
> Puffy the Blowfish on a Teak wooden stand - 95.00 USD
> Puffy the Blowfish in a Teak & Glass Fishtank - 135.00 USD
> (Quantities Limited, Registration Number & Certificate Included)
>
> A simple reply stating your willingness to purchase, and which type of
> Puffy you would like, will allow us to determine pre-orders
> and Limited Edition Quantities. We will then provide an update with
> pre-order numbers, time for delivery and payment terms and options.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Puffy the Blowfish
>
> PS Depending on number of orders taken we will be donating a percentage to
> help fund OpenBSD and some of its projects.
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
> IMG_2302.JPG]
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
> IMG_2303.JPG]



Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men

2008-01-04 Thread Johan Mson Lindman

Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:49:45PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
  

On Jan 4, 2008 2:31 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


What I find even more hysterical is your lack of english comprehension,
for what I said is that restrictions against commercial usage make it
proprietary, not that I need that piece of software.
  

you still don't get to make up new definitions for proprietary.



Neither do you, so you could spare everyone by not keeping this thread
going.

Rui

  


This thread was started by Stallman, not the OpenBSD folks.
That said I think it is important for OpenBSD developers to tell us 
users what a complete and unsolicited
fucknut you are so that we, the users, don't get the impression you have 
any kind of authority.


Anyway it has now been communicated what a blatant fucksteak you are so 
now that everyone knows,

feel free to stop posting to the thread.


Regards
Johan M:son Lindman



Re: HP DL320G5P doesn't boot [with full OpenBSD dmesg]

2007-12-21 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
> entry point at 0x1001e0 [7205c766, 3404, 24448b12,
> 800a304]jCopyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
>
>   The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
>
> Copyright (c) 1995-2007 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.
> http://www.OpenBSD.org
>
>
> OpenBSD 4.2 (RAMDISK_CD) #1249: Tue Aug 28 10:56:45 MDT 2007
>
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/RAMDISK_CD

This is not current, please try current on this system. There's been a lot of
changes since release and this system may just work using current, in 
particular there's this in the cvs log...
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=119688293820700&w=2


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: Real men don't attack straw men

2007-12-14 Thread Johan Mson Lindman

David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:

I am not out to get you. Richard is not out to get you. The FSF is
not out to get you. The world is not out to get you. But you appear to
  


Again, Richard made foul and faulty comments about OpenBSD first.
Richard then came to the OpenBSD mailing lists looking for a fight.

David you need to check the facts and shut your mouth.
Now, go away troll (that goes for both Stallman and the other clown).


Regards
Johan M:son Lindman



Re: OpenBSD in the webcomic XKCD

2007-11-26 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Monday 26 November 2007 18:37:05 you wrote:
> "V. Karthik Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Artur Grabowski wrote:
> > > frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> > >> dual boot at least once :]
> > >
> > > never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
> > > worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
> >
> > Either you knew everything then or you got incredibly lucky. Lots of
> > times, you aren't lucky even if you knew it all. Maybe if it all went
> > wrong, you'd have lost all partitions and would be to blame. We all
> > learn from mistakes and there is absolutely nothing "wrong" about
> > getting it "wrong". :-)
>
> no, the "wrong" part is in actually trying. :)
>
> //art


W/ "recent" changes to bootloader why _shouldn't_ you dualboot
i386 and amd64 on your amd64 laptop? ;-P


Regards
Johan M:son Linfman



Re: Paper about memory speed with multi-core CPUs

2007-11-24 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Saturday 24 November 2007 15:22:17 you wrote:
> Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> FYI.
>
> Abstract
> As CPU cores become both faster and more numerous, the limiting factor for
> most programs is now, and will be for some time, memory access. Hardware
> designers have come up with ever more sophisticated memory handling and
> acceleration techniquessuch as CPU cachesbut these cannot work optimally
> without some help from the programmer. Unfortunately, neither the structure
> nor the cost of using the memory subsystem of a computer or the caches on
> CPUs is well understood by most programmers. This paper explains the
> structure of memory subsystems in use on modern commodity hardware,
> illustrating why CPU caches were developed, how they work, and what
> programs should do to achieve optimal performance by utilizing them.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/drepper/cpumemory.pdf
>
> - Alexey.

Is this paper from the same Drepper as is posting in the URL below?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-08/msg00053.html

...


Regards
Johan M:son Lindman



Re: Motherboard recommendations? Pentium IV, 2GB+ RAM?

2005-11-19 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Saturday 19 November 2005 04:37, you wrote:
> > Well, that's because if you do use AMD64 instead of P4, you will get a
> > box a hell of a lot faster and the price would be the same to you and
> > believe me when I say that! You are MUCH better with AMD64 for a server
> > then P4. Flame me if you like, but you will hardly find anyone here
> > telling you to go use Intel instead of AMD64, specially if you have the
> > choice from now and you can built what you want!
> >
> > You would be much better off with AMD64, but that's just me!
>
> I haven't had good luck with AMD64 so far.  The server I built not
> a year ago has had more kernel panics and funky-ass behavior than
> any system I've built since the RedHat 6.2 days.  AMD64 is likely
> a damned good processor, but it's kind of soured on me.
>
> If people have a known solid motherboard + AMD64 combination they'd
> like to recommend that has a PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz slot in it, I'm
> certainly willing to consider it. 

I've a lot of HP DL145 G1 (please note the G1, G2s are not nearly as good) 
based on Opeteron which works fine and they've a 64bit 133 slot in a 1U 
chasis.
Not a single coredump or other kind of problem with this box and i've boxes 
doing DB, mail and IDS runing 24/7.
Though it might not be possible to still buy the G1 in your area, over here 
(Stockholm, Sweden) you can only get the G2s which unfortunately are based on 
nForce4 chipset and thus are not as well supported as the G1 which was based 
on AMD chipset.

So unless you feel this is a good day to get screwed, go get yourself an AMD64 
based computer.



Regards
Johan M:son



Re: Is the CDDL free Enough to get ZFS into OpenBSD?

2005-11-18 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Friday 18 November 2005 13:14, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a serious question. This really is not a try for trolling or
> something, can someone clue me up?

As you could've derived from this rather lengthy discussion on tech@ earlier 
this year the answer is, no, atleast not into base.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110806948606417&w=2


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: Problem instaling OpenBSD on IBM xSeries 336

2005-10-16 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Sunday 16 October 2005 10:15, you wrote:

> Please can anybody help me to solve ? I can run some kernel debbuger,
> not problem, but I have to know what to test.
>
> Please I am not subscribed to this list so send copy of answer if you
> direct it back to list.
>
> Thank you.

Wrong list, tech@ is not meant for general support, these types of queries 
goes to misc@, please read http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html before you post 
to the lists again.


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: cdio playback stops

2005-10-16 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Sunday 16 October 2005 05:01, you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just have a possible bug to report and want to make sure before sending it.
> I am trying to play an audio cd with cdio and it stops after a little
> while. The cd plays fine with xcd.
>
> dmesg | grep cd0
>
> cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0:  SCSI0
> 5/cdrom removable
> cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
>
> I have turned debug on in cdio but I'm not sure where to read that info.

Error reports not including full dmesg usually get ignored, goes for this one 
too.


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: installation stalled at wdo pciide 0:0:0 using pio mode 4,ultra-dma mode4

2005-10-09 Thread Johan Mson Lindman
On Sunday 09 October 2005 11:43, you wrote:
> No,
>
> Its not a typo.
> I have a old cd with version 3.3.
>
> Roelof

The point is that there's no support for that release, it's too old.
Get a copy of OpenBSD 3.7 or try out a -current snapshot and if the problem is 
still there, please report back.


Regards
Johan M:son



Re: LSI Logic 53C1030 on DL145-G2 not working

2005-08-09 Thread Johan Mson Lindman

bofh wrote:

Hi,

I have a HP DL145-G2. The SCSI card that comes with is supposed to be
supported by the mpt driver - the LSI Logic 53c1030 Fusion. It's not.

I also bought a MegaRAID 320-2X which I thought was supposed to be supported
by the ami driver, it's not. The MegaRaid has the latest bios, H429 build
Feb04, 2005.

Tested under both i386 and amd64 (both 3.7 and -current on Aug 2, 2005).

Anything that can be jiggled or twigged to make them work? Thanx in advance
for your kind help.


This is a really strange beast but it seems that OBSD has a problem 
detecting the PCI-bridges on the PCI-X riserboard in the HP DL145 G2.
Since the mpt(4) in question is seated in onf of the PCI-X riser board 
slots it is not detected.

I've described this in previous mails to this list.

The interesting thing is that if you run for instance NBSD you'll see 
some 7 ppb(4) however in OBSD only 3 ppb(4) are found. The mpt is in a 
slot behind the 7th ppb. Please see below dmesgs to see what I mean (yes 
I know, NBSD dmesgs do not belong on this list).


Anyway, my point is that the problem in this case is solely related to 
the pci-shitz in the DL 145 G2 (nForce 4 chipset) not working properly, 
the mpt is not at fault, I have tested the mpt to work in other machines.


There's also the issue with Nvidia who makes this particular 
motherboard, Nvidia does not give documentation to the project so we 
should all try to buy from other manufacturers if we can. That said, I 
for one thought I was buying reference AMD gear when I bought my 11 or 
so HP DL 145 G2 machines, turns out that HP swapped chipsets to 
reference AMD to Nvidia when bumping the HP DL145 rev from G1 to G2.
Guess the moral of the story is, HP are sneaky, allways be very very 
carefull when buying servers from them,


The PR for this can be found here;
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=112194234403097&w=2


Regards
Johan M:son


NetBSD 2.0.2 (GENERIC) #0: Tue Mar 22 04:58:56 UTC 2005

[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:/home/builds/ab/netbsd-2-0-2-RELEASE/amd64/200503220140Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-2-0-2-RELEASE/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GEN
ERIC
total memory = 1022 MB
avail memory = 978 MB
mainbus0 (root)
mainbus0: Intel MP Specification (Version 1.4) (AMD  HAMMER  )
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 246, 2009.37 MHz
cpu0: features: e7dbfbff
cpu0: features: e7dbfbff
cpu0: features: e7dbfbff
cpu0: I-cache 64 KB 64B/line 2-way, D-cache 64 KB 64B/line 2-way
cpu0: L2 cache 1 MB 64B/line 16-way
cpu0: ITLB 32 4 KB entries fully associative, 8 4 MB entries fully 
associative
cpu0: DTLB 32 4 KB entries fully associative, 8 4 MB entries fully 
associative

cpu0: calibrating local timer
cpu0: apic clock running at 200 MHz
cpu0: 16 page colors
mpbios: bus 0 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 1 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 2 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 3 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 4 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 128 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 129 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 134 is type PCI
mpbios: bus 139 is type ISA
ioapic0 at mainbus0 apid 1 (I/O APIC)
ioapic0: pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins
ioapic1 at mainbus0 apid 2 (I/O APIC)
ioapic1: pa 0xd800, version 11, 7 pins
ioapic2 at mainbus0 apid 3 (I/O APIC)
ioapic2: pa 0xd8001000, version 11, 7 pins
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1
pci0: i/o space, memory space enabled, rd/line, rd/mult, wr/inv ok
Nvidia Corporation product 0x005e (miscellaneous memory, revision 0xa3) at
pci0 dev 0 function 0 not configured
pcib0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0
pcib0: Nvidia Corporation product 0x0051 (rev. 0xa3)
Nvidia Corporation product 0x0052 (SMBus serial bus, revision 0xa2) at pci0
dev 1 function 1 not configured
ohci0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: Nvidia Corporation product 0x005a (rev. 
0xa2)

ohci0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 10 (irq 10)
ohci0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
usb0 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0 at usb0
uhub0: Nvidia Corporat OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
Nvidia Corporation product 0x005b (USB serial bus, interface 0x20, revision
0xa3) at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured
pciide0 at pci0 dev 6 function 0
pciide0: Nvidia Corporation product 0x0053 (rev. 0xa2)
pciide0: bus-master DMA support present, but unused (no driver support)
pciide0: primary channel configured to compatibility mode
pciide0: primary channel interrupting at ioapic0 pin 14 (irq 14)
atabus0 at pciide0 channel 0
pciide0: secondary channel configured to compatibility mode
pciide0: secondary channel ignored (not responding; disabled or no drives?)
pciide1 at pci0 dev 8 function 0
pciide1: Nvidia Corporation product 0x0055 (rev. 0xa3)
pciide1: bus-master DMA support present, but unused (no driver support)
pciide1: primary channel wired to native-PCI mode
pciide1: using ioapic0 pin 10 (irq 10) for native-PCI interrupt
atabus1 at pciide1 channel 0
pciide1: secondary channel wired to native-PCI mode
atabus2 at pciide1 channel 1
ppb0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0: N