Re: NSD vs BIND

2012-08-22 Thread John Bond
On 22 August 2012 04:57, Mikkel Bang  wrote:
> Hello!
>
> For authoritative nameservers - which do you guys prefer, NSD or BIND?
NSD requires a restart of the daemon to add or remove zones (this
should be resolved in nsd 4).  So if this is something you do a lot
and you need to avoid down time i would go with bind.  In relation to
dnssec belive 9.4.2 is able to serve a DNSSEC signed zone; however
there where a few things it didn't support NSEC3 (avalible in 9.5) and
sha256 (available in 9.7).  If you are serving a simple zone and you
dont care about nsec3 then you could probably get away with using the
bind in base although you may be asking for trouble.



Re: ADSL2+ PCI card

2009-05-17 Thread John Bond
Thanks for all the responses everyone it looks like the viking card
may be what im after.
 - it presents itself as an eathernet adapter
 - it has a cli to configure te onboard ADSL2+ router
 - the network adapter REL8139 is suported by the rl driver
Thanks all



Re: ADSL2+ PCI card

2009-05-14 Thread John Bond
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:29 PM, John Bond  wrote:
> Thanks for your reposne russell,  what i have read agrees with your
> response however i wasn't sure if the rel8139 chip was supported, i
> couldn't find it on the hardware list
>
it has been pointed out to me that i cant read and it is clearly
stated that the  REL8139 chip is supported by the rl
(http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=rl&arch=i386&sektion=4)
driver.  It is clearly stated on the hardware compatibility list,
under the heading of "RealTek 8129/8139-based adapters".  sorry for
not reading the manual



Re: ADSL2+ PCI card

2009-05-14 Thread John Bond
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Rod Whitworth  wrote:
> I have no experience with either BUT I do know that the Viking just
> "looks like" a Realtek NIC to OpenBSD. That was done to make the
> provision of drivers unnecessary.

I just got the following response from a tech at traverse.com.au which
inidicates it does work, thanks for he response

"The Viking uses an RTL8139 NIC, so it appears as ethernet card and
will work with any O/S that supports the 8139.
So there will be no problems with xBSD, I've actually tried pfSense
with a Viking at home and it worked fine."



Re: ADSL2+ PCI card

2009-05-14 Thread John Bond
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Russell Howe  wrote:

> These should work fine - the S518 presents itself as a special ADSL
> controller on the PCI bus, but AFAIK the 519 is actually an ethernet chip
> (Realtek 8139?) paired up with an ADSL modem on a PCI card, so all the
> computer sees is an ethernet card.
>
> I think you configure the ADSL modem by telnetting to it through the
> ethernet card, but I'm not sure.

Thanks for your reposne russell,  what i have read agrees with your
response however i wasn't sure if the rel8139 chip was supported, i
couldn't find it on the hardware list



ADSL2+ PCI card

2009-05-14 Thread John Bond
Hello,

Im looking into bulding a home rourter device and my obvious OS choice
is OpenBSD however im strugeling to find an ADSL2+ pci cards which i
can use.  I have only managed to find to devices which may work

snagoma data card s519 --
http://www.sangoma.com/products_and_solutions/hardware/data_networking/s519.html
or possibly the
Viking PCI ADSL2+ Modem Card -- http://www.yawarra.com.au/pdfs/XC-P-ADSL2-V.pdf

does anyone have any expirence with these cards and know if they do
work with OpenBSD or know if they are better options

cheers



Bind Help

2008-02-14 Thread John Bond
Sorry, resending with subject


hello list,

 i sent the below to the bind-users list but thought/hoped some one
 here may be able to help me as well.
 
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dns.bind/browse_thread/thread/9c35c2a9fdb74307/3de2aa534daa8492
 its probably worth mentioning that the machines are unfortunatly
 runing RH.  any help apriciated thanks