Re: 0.0.0.0/32 in pf's tables

[Tom Smyth]

yeah 0.0.0.0/32 ,( legacy broadcast address is a valid address and would be
included in very verbose explicit rules blocking traffic from invalid src
addresses ( for example)

hope this helps

On Fri 11 Nov 2022, 20:23 3,  wrote:

> a very clever man once said that God does not play dice.. and he was
> wrong! so it is too presumptuous to believe that you know the ways of the
> God ;) seriously, if i can use 0.0.0.0/32 in rules, then why can't i use
> the same in tables? i don't think God cares why i do it
>
>
> > God abhors a naked singularity.
>
>
> > On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 22:47 +0300, 3 wrote:
> >> what religion forbids using 0.0.0.0/32 in tables? 0_0 but 0/0 can be
> >> used.. what's going on?! is the world going mad?
> >>
>
>
>

Re: 0.0.0.0/32 in pf's tables

[3]

a very clever man once said that God does not play dice.. and he was wrong! so 
it is too presumptuous to believe that you know the ways of the God ;) 
seriously, if i can use 0.0.0.0/32 in rules, then why can't i use the same in 
tables? i don't think God cares why i do it


> God abhors a naked singularity.


> On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 22:47 +0300, 3 wrote:
>> what religion forbids using 0.0.0.0/32 in tables? 0_0 but 0/0 can be
>> used.. what's going on?! is the world going mad?
>> 

Re: 0.0.0.0/32 in pf's tables

[Justin Yates Fletcher]

God abhors a naked singularity.


On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 22:47 +0300, 3 wrote:
> what religion forbids using 0.0.0.0/32 in tables? 0_0 but 0/0 can be
> used.. what's going on?! is the world going mad?
> 

0.0.0.0/32 in pf's tables

[3]

what religion forbids using 0.0.0.0/32 in tables? 0_0 but 0/0 can be used.. 
what's going on?! is the world going mad?