Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-21 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
I was just thinking today about how cool it would be to have an OpenBSD
phone, and then I saw your post. How bizarre. Anyway, the closest thing I
have found to a "pocket computer phone" is the android line of phones. I've
had an original Droid, and now I have a Droid Incredible, and I absolutely
love them. They have multitasking, ssh (ConnectBot), email, full web
browsers, and my favorite feature: the ability to connect to a bluetooth
keyboard. Sometimes I forget I'm using a phone at all. I don't see many
comparable "open" phones coming any time soon, so in the meantime, this is
the best I've found out there. Good luck on your phone search.
On Nov 17, 2010 3:02 AM, "Jan Stary"  wrote:
> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>
> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
> wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
> to install obsd on some of these newer phones?
>
> I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
> a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would
> have an OS based on BSD?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jan



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-21 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 17/11/10 12:59, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Jan Stary  wrote:
>
>> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
>> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>>
>> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
>> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
> The most open smartphone I'm aware of is the Nokia N900.
>
>> wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
>> to install obsd on some of these newer phones?
> No.  Also, compare the user interface and applications useful on a
> phone with what's available for OpenBSD.
>
>> I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
>> a modified linux;
> Android and Maemo are Linux-based.  Symbian, iOS, Bada, Blackberry
> and Windows Mobile are not.
>
>> does anyone know about a varinat that would have an OS based on BSD?
> Apple's iOS is the most BSD-ish.  But that is utterly closed, and
> the iPhone is dongled to the proprietary iTunes program (Mac OS,
> MS Windows).
>


Nokia N900 is actually the most open smartphone there is.
Some andriod-based phones are open, on others, there's no chance of
installing another OS.
I've heard of a couple of linux distros running on N900, and you can
actually dual-boot on it, which would be nice __while__ you're trying to
get openbsd running (assuming it doesn't work out of the box, which I
don't expect it to).

-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-21 Thread Mark Shroyer
On 11/21/2010 3:55 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Oh my god, yes, virtual machines are so safe.

Huh?  I was replying to Marco's statement that

>>> [Android] is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read
>>> your email, credit card numbers, etc etc.

Which seemed to imply that Android has built-in backdoor access for
Google, and by proxy the U.S. government.  I'm not claiming that Android
is free of security defects (let alone because of the Dalvik VM) -- just
that, at least as far as the core open-source operating system goes, it
doesn't have any intentional backdoors.

Or am I misunderstanding you here?

-- 
Mark Shroyer
http://markshroyer.com/contact/



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-21 Thread Дмитрий Царьков
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Christian Weisgerber
 wrote:
> Android and Maemo are Linux-based. B Symbian, iOS, Bada, Blackberry
> and Windows Mobile are not.

Bada is typically linux-based, while Bada implementation inSamsung
Wave S8500 isn't. Actually it  contains code from BSD flavour
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bada_(operating_system)#Architecture).

--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-21 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > It is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read your email,
> > credit card numbers, etc etc.
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> >> The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
> >> have to say I like it a lot. But it is definitely not open as
> >> possible.
> 
> If you really think this is a concern you can just run a ROM of the
> open-source Android operating system (such as Cyanogen) without the
> proprietary Google applications on top, and then you have nothing to
> worry about.

Oh my god, yes, virtual machines are so safe.



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-20 Thread Mark Shroyer
On 11/17/2010 7:28 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> It is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read your email,
> credit card numbers, etc etc.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
>> The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
>> have to say I like it a lot. But it is definitely not open as
>> possible.

If you really think this is a concern you can just run a ROM of the
open-source Android operating system (such as Cyanogen) without the
proprietary Google applications on top, and then you have nothing to
worry about.

-- 
Mark Shroyer
http://markshroyer.com/contact/



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-19 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:51:00PM -0600, Marko Kraljevic said that
> The most open phone I'm aware of is Nokia N900. It runs Maemo, and can

http://wiki.geeksphone.com/en/index.php?title=Main_Page

-f
-- 
go and catch a falling star...



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-18 Thread Super Biscuit
  You're looking at this from a programmer's perspective and not from a
business one.
let's look at the basic Unix-like/descended systems: All were developed
because each founder- or founders- saw a niche, necessity, or challenge.
Nokia, Google, and Apple are business entities whose purpose is to create
revenue by selling products or services.

You're going to wait until 15,000 or more people demand/ask for pf on a smart
phone? Neither the mainframe nor the desktop nor the cell phone were created
because the public wanted them.

Look at advertising and how it works.
1) Create a need for a product by using two or more of the appeals. Culture,
society, ethnicity, family, etc.
2) PR is important.

If you're a programmer and you want the product out:
1) I'm not sure how ARM is but I do know that the company designs chips.
2) You'll have to build the system and take gtk and qt sources to build on
it.


What won't sell to the public is the conversations on the mailing lists or
between programmers.

What will sell are key points such as:

1) It is two to four times faster than other smartphones and uses half of the
memory.
People like it when extra shit runs smooth on their tablets and phones.
2) It can be used as a router for other devices and still work as a phone.
"What? I can make a call, browse the web, and still hook up my netbook?"
3) The system is stable. Your personal information remains as such.
4) And for the hackers... You can do what you want with it.


The programmers are for support, development, and design.


Yes, I am a business major. I have experience in selling futures. I am
certified in management.

You can see this as a business opportunity and a challenge or you can continue
as before.
Those of you who do have a working understanding of the basic business model
will have no trouble following this post.



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Marco Peereboom
It is ok if you don't mind goolge and the us gov to read your email,
credit card numbers, etc etc.

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Tomas Vavrys wrote:
> The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
> have to say I like it a lot. But it is definitely not open as
> possible.
> 
> 2010/11/17 patric conant :
> > Yes, and we won't be supporting any obsolete platforms around here.
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2010 8:34 AM, "Francesco Vollero"  wrote:
> >
> > Il 17/11/10 15.17, Ted Unangst ha scritto:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
> >> obsolete.
> > I Agree. It's really really obsolete.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Sergey Bronnikov
> > B wrote:
> >>>
> >>> may be http:...



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Paul M

On 18/11/2010, at 10:15 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:


2010/11/17 Ted Unangst :

Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
obsolete.


And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.

Best
Martin


 ... And is a fraudster and a criminal


paulm



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Francesco Vollero

Il 17/11/10 23.51, Marko Kraljevic ha scritto:

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jan Stary  wrote:


[snap]

The most open phone I'm aware of is Nokia N900. It runs Maemo, and can
run full blown Debian, AFAIK. Never heard of anyone running OpenBSD on
one, but perhaps it is possible? I'm assuming it would take some
hacking, though.


As far i know, there's just one phone with something like bsd, it's 
iphone. Yeah, sucks.


At the end, if someone run netbsd on a toaster with ARM9 this mean that 
openbsd can be ported too, but the main problem is:
Who give all the specifies for the components? We dont want to agree to 
some strange NDA just to have a {open|net|whatelse}bsd phone.
Another question is: The developer community it's enough big to support 
it too??




Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Francesco Vollero

Il 18/11/10 00.53, m brandenberg ha scritto:

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Jona Joachim wrote:


The hardware is slow and buggy and the OpenBSD Moko port is dead.
Just don't buy it ;)


That said, I have a Neo 1973 available for a deal if anyone wants
to play...


Dont even try to donate to the community :)



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread m brandenberg

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Jona Joachim wrote:


The hardware is slow and buggy and the OpenBSD Moko port is dead.
Just don't buy it ;)


That said, I have a Neo 1973 available for a deal if anyone wants
to play...

--
Monty Brandenberg



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread roberth
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:51:00 -0600
Marko Kraljevic  wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jan Stary  wrote:
> > My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> > most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
> >
> > Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> > a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
> > wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
> > to install obsd on some of these newer phones?
> >
> > I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
> > a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would
> > have an OS based on BSD?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Jan
> >
> >
> 
> 
> The most open phone I'm aware of is Nokia N900. It runs Maemo, and can
> run full blown Debian, AFAIK. Never heard of anyone running OpenBSD on
> one, but perhaps it is possible? I'm assuming it would take some
> hacking, though.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N900
> 
> I'd like to play with one at some point, but I'm a little too broke
> for that at the moment.
> 

So offtopic, but i'll bite.
Yes, N900 is the only phone i'd consider atm.
If i'd have to buy a linux phone (no alternative) it'd be a N900 and put
Meego on it.
Android is just too restrictive.
The HTC 7 Pro hw looks nice, but without any docu or source ...
Me personally will stick with my 6820 until i can test the first real
Meego querty slider.
(Now if there were 15k+ ppl preordering a phone with openbsd+pf there
might be a chance to get something "good".)



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Martin Schröder
2010/11/17 Jona Joachim :
> On 2010-11-17, Martin Schr?der  wrote:
>> And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.
>
> Obvious troll is obvious.

Ask Theo about Mr. Vandeputte. :-)

Oh, and if you believe http://accounting.kd85.com/ , read the list
archives.

Best
   Martin



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Marko Kraljevic
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jan Stary  wrote:
> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>
> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
> wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
> to install obsd on some of these newer phones?
>
> I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
> a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would
> have an OS based on BSD?
>
>Thanks
>
>Jan
>
>


The most open phone I'm aware of is Nokia N900. It runs Maemo, and can
run full blown Debian, AFAIK. Never heard of anyone running OpenBSD on
one, but perhaps it is possible? I'm assuming it would take some
hacking, though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N900

I'd like to play with one at some point, but I'm a little too broke
for that at the moment.



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Jona Joachim
On 2010-11-17, Martin Schr?der  wrote:
> 2010/11/17 Ted Unangst :
>> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
>> obsolete.
>
> And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.

Obvious troll is obvious.


-- 
Worse is better
Richard P. Gabriel



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Jona Joachim
On 2010-11-17, Ted Unangst  wrote:
> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
> obsolete.

On top of that graphics and wifi documentation is only available under
NDA and the reverse engineered Linux drivers are broken.
The hardware is slow and buggy and the OpenBSD Moko port is dead.
Just don't buy it ;)

Best regards,
Jona

-- 
Worse is better
Richard P. Gabriel



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Martin Schröder
2010/11/17 Ted Unangst :
> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
> obsolete.

And the supplier in question is known to hate Theo and OpenBSD.

Best
Martin



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Jan Stary  wrote:

> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
> 
> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented

The most open smartphone I'm aware of is the Nokia N900.

> wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
> to install obsd on some of these newer phones?

No.  Also, compare the user interface and applications useful on a
phone with what's available for OpenBSD.

> I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
> a modified linux;

Android and Maemo are Linux-based.  Symbian, iOS, Bada, Blackberry
and Windows Mobile are not.

> does anyone know about a varinat that would have an OS based on BSD?

Apple's iOS is the most BSD-ish.  But that is utterly closed, and
the iPhone is dongled to the proprietary iTunes program (Mac OS,
MS Windows).

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Tomas Vavrys
The best options is Android at the moment. It's working fine and I
have to say I like it a lot. But it is definitely not open as
possible.

2010/11/17 patric conant :
> Yes, and we won't be supporting any obsolete platforms around here.
>
> On Nov 17, 2010 8:34 AM, "Francesco Vollero"  wrote:
>
> Il 17/11/10 15.17, Ted Unangst ha scritto:
>
>
>>
>> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
>> obsolete.
> I Agree. It's really really obsolete.
>
>
>
>
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Sergey Bronnikov
> B wrote:
>>>
>>> may be http:...



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread patric conant
Yes, and we won't be supporting any obsolete platforms around here.

On Nov 17, 2010 8:34 AM, "Francesco Vollero"  wrote:

Il 17/11/10 15.17, Ted Unangst ha scritto:


>
> Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
> obsolete.
I Agree. It's really really obsolete.




> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Sergey Bronnikov
 wrote:
>>
>> may be http:...



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Francesco Vollero

Il 17/11/10 15.17, Ted Unangst ha scritto:

Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
obsolete.

I Agree. It's really really obsolete.



On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Sergey Bronnikov  wrote:

may be http://openmoko.kd85.com/ ?

On 09:00 Wed 17 Nov , Jan Stary wrote:

My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
most probably with one of these newer smartphones.

Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
to install obsd on some of these newer phones?

I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would
have an OS based on BSD?

   Thanks

   Jan


--
sergeyb@




Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Ted Unangst
Compared to the hardware available today, the openmoko is ridiculously
obsolete.

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Sergey Bronnikov  wrote:
> may be http://openmoko.kd85.com/ ?
>
> On 09:00 Wed 17 Nov , Jan Stary wrote:
>> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
>> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
>>
>> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
>> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
>> wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
>> to install obsd on some of these newer phones?
>>
>> I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
>> a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would
>> have an OS based on BSD?
>>
>>   Thanks
>>
>>   Jan
>>
>
> --
> sergeyb@



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Sergey Bronnikov
may be http://openmoko.kd85.com/ ?

On 09:00 Wed 17 Nov , Jan Stary wrote:
> My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
> most probably with one of these newer smartphones.
> 
> Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
> a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
> wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
> to install obsd on some of these newer phones?
> 
> I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
> a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would
> have an OS based on BSD?
> 
>   Thanks
> 
>   Jan
> 

-- 
sergeyb@



Re: An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread rancor
Use duct tape and wire it with a netbook with internal GSM module around
your head and install vanilla OpenBSD... works perfectly

Don't use that new thing called 3g, umts,cdma or anything else. It's alien
technology
Den 2010 11 17 09:05 skrev "Jan Stary" :



An OpenBSD smartphone

2010-11-17 Thread Jan Stary
My twelve years old cell phone needs to get replaced,
most probably with one of these newer smartphones.

Beside other things, I want it to be as "open" as possible:
a freely-available OS, a class-compliant USB storage, a documented
wifi hardware, etc. So, in this regard: has someone managed
to install obsd on some of these newer phones?

I understand that most of these have an OS that is basically
a modified linux; does anyone know about a varinat that would
have an OS based on BSD?

Thanks

Jan