Re: Another pf.conf(5) man bug?

[Jason McIntyre]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:44:06AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> 
> The pf.conf(5) grammer says:
> 
> routehost  = ( interface-name [ address [ "/" mask-bits ] ] )
> 
> I'm thinking it should be:
> 
> routehost  = "(" interface-name [ address [ "/" mask-bits ] ] ")"
> 

just fixed by daniel too...
jmc

Another pf.conf(5) man bug?

[Karl O. Pinc]

I may be wrong here but it seems to me that either
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outexample
is wrong in it's route-to syntax or the grammer
in pf.conf(5) has a bug.

http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outexample
has 4 statements that contain route to, vis:
pass out on $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) from $ext_if2 to any

The pf.conf(5) grammer says:

routehost  = ( interface-name [ address [ "/" mask-bits ] ] )

I'm thinking it should be:

routehost  = "(" interface-name [ address [ "/" mask-bits ] ] ")"

?

Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
 -- Robert A. Heinlein