Re: Appimage
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 10:31:00PM +0200, Mihai Popescu wrote: > > The point of appimage is to work on any Linux distro. > > But it is not working. Like many other ideas created to work on any distro ... > That's a whole other discussion beyond making it work on OpenBSD ;) As I understand it that's because packagers don't understand that you're supposed to include *every* library in your appimage.
Re: Appimage
> The point of appimage is to work on any Linux distro. But it is not working. Like many other ideas created to work on any distro ...
Re: Appimage
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 03:50:26PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a pipe dream but atleast I imagine the filesystem API > and /proc avoidance is likely possible. > > "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/issues/98"; > The point of appimage is to work on any Linux distro. There's only one OpenBSD. An AppImage written for Linux with the Linux ABI won't run on OpenBSD even if /proc is implemented.
Re: Appimage
On 19.12.23 16:50, Kevin Chadwick wrote: I'm not sure if this is a pipe dream but atleast I imagine the filesystem API and /proc avoidance is likely possible. "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/issues/98"; A few months ago I wrote a proof of concept /proc implementation for OpenBSD using FUSE: https://got.stuerz.xyz/?action=summary&path=procfs-fuse.git It might help you in getting AppImages to work on OpenBSD, but /proc is probably the least of your problems.
Re: Appimage
Kevin Chadwick writes: > I'm not sure if this is a pipe dream but atleast I imagine the filesystem API > and /proc avoidance is likely possible. > Depends on what you're smoking in said pipe. > "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/issues/98";
Appimage
I'm not sure if this is a pipe dream but atleast I imagine the filesystem API and /proc avoidance is likely possible. "https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/issues/98";
