Re: Bluetooth on 4.2 (solved in -current)

2008-02-10 Thread gwk
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:56:24PM -0800, Wim Lewis wrote:
 On Jan 14, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:20:46AM +, Wim Lewis wrote:
 How much should I expect Bluetooth to be working on OBSD 4.2? I can get 
 some
 things to work, but I can't successfully open an RFCOMM connecton.

 The ubt(4) driver was fixed in -current, -r1.10 of sys/dev/usb/ubt.c.

 Aha! Thank you, with that change pulled into -stable I can search/browse 
 SDP info and make rfcomm connections to nearby devices.

 I notice that the sockets and interfaces used by Bluetooth don't show up in 
 utilities like netstat and ifconfig. Is that the direction that Bluetooth 
 support is heading? I think it would be a reasonable approach to treat bt 
 like any other network interface (albeit one that doesn't carry IP), since 
 bt is pretty network-like...

I am not sure what direction OpenBSD will go WRT the bluetooth tools
uwe@ and I imported the bluetooth stack from netbsd at c2k7 but I think
we are in agreement that the userland interface is awful 4 uttilities to
setup a serial connection is unacceptable, perhaps we can get something
cleaner but it will be post 4.3.

gwk



Re: Bluetooth on 4.2 (solved in -current)

2008-01-17 Thread Wim Lewis

On Jan 14, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Uwe Stuehler wrote:

On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:20:46AM +, Wim Lewis wrote:
How much should I expect Bluetooth to be working on OBSD 4.2? I  
can get some

things to work, but I can't successfully open an RFCOMM connecton.


The ubt(4) driver was fixed in -current, -r1.10 of sys/dev/usb/ubt.c.


Aha! Thank you, with that change pulled into -stable I can search/ 
browse SDP info and make rfcomm connections to nearby devices.


I notice that the sockets and interfaces used by Bluetooth don't show  
up in utilities like netstat and ifconfig. Is that the direction that  
Bluetooth support is heading? I think it would be a reasonable  
approach to treat bt like any other network interface (albeit one  
that doesn't carry IP), since bt is pretty network-like...