Re: 3.9 + ath....panic fixed in -current and can it run G band yet as well ?
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:35:58 -0700, Allie Daneman wrote: >> if not, then there is more reverse engineering to be done, but it's very >> slow and painstaking work. >I bet...you have any recommendations for Soekris/OpenBSD friendly G band >MiniPCI cards ? Man I just bought another ath card too...it may >be hitting Ebay when it arrives ;) >> MSI makes one using ral. The PCI version seems to work ok. >From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look from up over? Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list. Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
Re: 3.9 + ath....panic fixed in -current and can it run G band yet as well ?
Chris Cappuccio([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:03:35PM -0700: > Allie Daneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > is why I bought this card ;) Should I shutup and upgrade to -current and/or > > will G band > > be supported (maybe 4.0) ? > > > > ath0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "Atheros AR5212" rev 0x01: irq 11 > > ath0: AR5213 5.9 phy 4.3 rf5112 3.6, FCC2A*, address 00:0b:6b:37:29:87 > > > > your dmesg shows a 5213 chip, actually > > someone recently imported some HAL fixes from the linux atheros free-hal > things > which were in turn based on the original openbsd free hal. maybe this fixes > your 5213 problems. try a current snapshot Tried itno difference, no G band still. > > if not, then there is more reverse engineering to be done, but it's very > slow and painstaking work. I bet...you have any recommendations for Soekris/OpenBSD friendly G band MiniPCI cards ? Man I just bought another ath card too...it may be hitting Ebay when it arrives ;) > ~Allie
Re: 3.9 + ath....panic fixed in -current and can it run G band yet as well ?
On 7/4/06, Allie Daneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been having the panic problem reported by others on stable and saw a post by Reyk that it's fixed in -current. That's awesome, thanks for the fix...but I also wanted to ask if there's work towards getting G band working in the ath driver, specifically the AR5212 chip. I'm running a Soekris 4521 w/miniPCI and would LOVE to run G band...which is why I bought this card ;) Should I shutup and upgrade to -current and/or will G band be supported (maybe 4.0) ? dmesg ath0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "Atheros AR5212" rev 0x01: irq 11 ath0: AR5213 5.9 phy 4.3 rf5112 3.6, FCC2A*, address 00:0b:6b:37:29:87 CVS commit by reyk File: [OpenBSD] / src / sys / dev / ic / ath.c (download) Revision 1.52, Fri Jun 23 21:53:01 2006 UTC (10 days, 19 hours ago) by reyk Branch: MAIN CVS Tags: HEAD Changes since 1.51: +4 -2 lines set the RSSI Max value in ath(4) and use the new RSSI radiotap header instead of the old db signal header. also allow tcpdump and hostapd to print the new RSSI radiotap header values current/max rssi. ok damien@ jsg@ I'm no longer seeing panics with my AR5211 (as listed in PR 5054) but I still can't connect via 802.11a or 802.11b. This is with the Netgear WAB501, I'm still getting the cardbus errors like these: cbb0: bad Vcc request. sock_ctrl 0x30, sock_status 0x3b20 ath0 at cardbus0 dev 0 function 0 "NETGEAR WAB501 802.11a/b Wireless Adapter, 00 , \M^?": irq 11 ath0: AR5211 4.2 phy 3.0 rf5111 1.7 rf2111 2.3, FCC1A, address 00:09:5b:40:7d:3c cbb0: bad Vcc request. sock_ctrl 0x0, sock_status 0x3b69 Greg
Re: 3.9 + ath....panic fixed in -current and can it run G band yet as well ?
Allie Daneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > is why I bought this card ;) Should I shutup and upgrade to -current and/or > will G band > be supported (maybe 4.0) ? > > ath0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "Atheros AR5212" rev 0x01: irq 11 > ath0: AR5213 5.9 phy 4.3 rf5112 3.6, FCC2A*, address 00:0b:6b:37:29:87 > your dmesg shows a 5213 chip, actually someone recently imported some HAL fixes from the linux atheros free-hal things which were in turn based on the original openbsd free hal. maybe this fixes your 5213 problems. try a current snapshot if not, then there is more reverse engineering to be done, but it's very slow and painstaking work.