Re: android's adb

2011-10-20 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 06:15:01PM +0200, frantisek holop said that
> android.git.kernel.org being down, i cannot have a look at
> the adb sources.  i am not really interested in the SDK itself,
> although it would be nice i guess.

looks like, google finally got its act together and the sources
are available again (not ICS of course).

i am also crossposting this to ports@

is there a WIP port we could help testing?
(also of libusb)

-f
-- 
to every rule there's an exception & vice versa.



Re: android's adb

2011-10-11 Thread Brynet
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:28:28PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 11/10/11(Tue) 11:07, Brynet wrote:
> > I'd be interested in testing this, does he plan on submitting it to ports@?
> 
> Of course, what a question ;)

I was just wondering if you something that could be tested, sorry if that came
across as rude.

> But for the moment the port, or more precisely the backend based on
> ugen(4) is not quite ready. I've still some issues to fix before
> submitting it to ports@.

That's great, thanks. I had a look at it in the past when I noticed that a lot 
of projects were using it now, at the time only Linux has libusb-1.0.

FreeBSD has their own libusb 1.0 API implementation, but it didn't appear worth 
the effort to port.

I'd like to get usbmuxd/libimobiledevice working so I can play with one of my 
iDevices without wireless.

> Martin

-Bryan.



Re: android's adb

2011-10-11 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 11/10/11(Tue) 11:07, Brynet wrote:
> Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > mpi has a port of libusb 1.0 which I am actually putting under tests.
> 
> I'd be interested in testing this, does he plan on submitting it to ports@?

Of course, what a question ;)

But for the moment the port, or more precisely the backend based on
ugen(4) is not quite ready. I've still some issues to fix before
submitting it to ports@.

Martin



Re: android's adb

2011-10-11 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Brynet wrote:

> Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > mpi has a port of libusb 1.0 which I am actually putting under tests.
> 
> I'd be interested in testing this, does he plan on submitting it to ports@?

Sure when it's in a working state. But leave him answer :)

-- 
Antoine



Re: android's adb

2011-10-11 Thread Brynet
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> mpi has a port of libusb 1.0 which I am actually putting under tests.

I'd be interested in testing this, does he plan on submitting it to ports@?

-Bryan.



Re: android's adb

2011-10-10 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, joshua stein wrote:

> (this should probably be on ports@)
> 
> > with more and more android phones around,
> > it would be nice to have a working 'adb'
> > to make backups and push custom ROMs on the devices.
> > 
> > i found an older adb linux exectuble in their SDK archives.
> > it can be started under linux emulation, but that's about it:
> 
> i just looked at the code and was able to get most of it to compile
> on openbsd, except the usb stub (usb_libusb.c) which requires
> libusb-1.0.  we only have libusb-0.1 in our ports tree, which uses
> the old api, and the new api has changed pretty much everything.

mpi has a port of libusb 1.0 which I am actually putting under tests.

-- 
Antoine



Re: android's adb

2011-10-10 Thread joshua stein
(this should probably be on ports@)

> with more and more android phones around,
> it would be nice to have a working 'adb'
> to make backups and push custom ROMs on the devices.
> 
> i found an older adb linux exectuble in their SDK archives.
> it can be started under linux emulation, but that's about it:

i just looked at the code and was able to get most of it to compile
on openbsd, except the usb stub (usb_libusb.c) which requires
libusb-1.0.  we only have libusb-0.1 in our ports tree, which uses
the old api, and the new api has changed pretty much everything.