Re: com_err.h

2015-03-11 Thread Stuart Henderson 
On 2015-03-10, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
 On my current/i386, /usr/include/com_err.h is a broken symlink
 to /usr/include/kerberosV/com_err.h which does not exist.

 Did I miss it during some previous upgrade, or is it the GNU
 /usr/src/gnu/gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/com_err.h ?

   Jan



I'd rm -r /usr/include/* and unpack comp57.tgz again.

Re: com_err.h

2015-03-10 Thread Ricardo Mestre 

Hi Jan,

If you are really following -current then you must have missed that 
kerberos (along with a few buddies) has been removed from base in the 
transition from 5.5 to 5.6.


Please check this section - 
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade56.html#RmFiles


Best regards,
Mestre

On 03/10/2015 11:36 AM, Jan Stary wrote:

On my current/i386, /usr/include/com_err.h is a broken symlink
to /usr/include/kerberosV/com_err.h which does not exist.

Did I miss it during some previous upgrade, or is it the GNU
/usr/src/gnu/gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/com_err.h ?

Jan

Re: com_err.h

2015-03-10 Thread Jan Stary 
On Mar 10 12:17:41, rmes...@helheim.mooo.com wrote:
 Hi Jan,
 
 If you are really following -current then you must have missed that kerberos
 (along with a few buddies) has been removed from base in the transition from
 5.5 to 5.6.
 
 Please check this section -
 http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade56.html#RmFiles

I believe I did that - I don't have those files on my system.
But the removal list does not mention /usr/include/com_err.h;
the only occurence of com_err is rm -f /usr/lib/libcom_err{,_p}.*

Is it simply that rm -f /usr/include/com_err.h
is missing from that list?

Jan

 On 03/10/2015 11:36 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
 On my current/i386, /usr/include/com_err.h is a broken symlink
 to /usr/include/kerberosV/com_err.h which does not exist.
 
 Did I miss it during some previous upgrade, or is it the GNU
 /usr/src/gnu/gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/com_err.h ?
 
  Jan