Useful cwm patch [was: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?]

2020-04-15 Thread Dumitru Moldovan

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:43:26AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:


I like cwm(1) but it's still a bit green and isn't getting enough
attention, I had to insist to get this first patch committed:

 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=149182817427598&w=2

This second one is still pending (no response from the maintainer so
far):

 https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=155931484124288&w=2


Apologies for resurrecting a dead and buried thread, but this second
patch is actually really useful.  Have tested it for a few months as a
single patch to my 6.6 cwm, it works so good I actually forgot about it.

CC'ing cwm maintainer in the hope he'll consider it.  Thanks!



Re: Useful cwm patch [was: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?]

2020-04-23 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
In article <20200415193758.csp3wtf4hnhdc...@gmx.com> Dumitru Moldovan 
 wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:43:26AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> >This second one is still pending (no response from the maintainer so
> >far):
> >
> >  https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=155931484124288&w=2
> 
> Apologies for resurrecting a dead and buried thread, but this second
> patch is actually really useful.  Have tested it for a few months as a
> single patch to my 6.6 cwm, it works so good I actually forgot about it.
> 
> CC'ing cwm maintainer in the hope he'll consider it.  Thanks!
> 
> 

Let me add that *this is a bug*, not a feature.  A bug that affects
basic functionality.


Walter