Hi,
On Thu, 11.09.2008 at 10:05:36 +0200, Markus Friedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I've just discovered that this is unsupported.
> >
> > How difficult would it be to add support for this?
>
> why not just tag the packet on enc0 and altq on the 'real' interface?
this implies a 1:1 correspondence between the packets on enc0 and the,
in my case, ESP packets on the real interface, and the sequence of
operation: Packet -> enc0 -> real interface. I'm not sure whether or
not that is a wise assumption (what about fragmentation and
reassembly?), but if it is, there'd not be a problem. It also requires
the use of labels, if I understand correctly.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
