Re: [ way... OT ] ho hum

2006-10-06 Thread Johan SANCHEZ
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:04:30 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Skinner) wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 05:59:17AM +0200, Johan SANCHEZ wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:18:25 +0100
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Skinner) wrote:
> >
> > > Another weekend at work:
> > >
> > > # uname -a
> > > SunOS X 5.10 Generic_XX sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
> > > # uname -X
> > > System = SunOS
> > > Node = XX
> > > Release = 5.10
> > > KernelID = Generic_XX
> > > Machine = sun4u
> > > BusType = 
> > > Serial = 
> > > Users = 
> > > OEM# = 0
> > > Origin# = 1
> > > NumCPU = 144
> > >
> > > # id
> > > uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe one day this could have a great dmesg.., not to mention
> > > the
> > > rest of the cluster.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Be patient :))
> > psrinfo ???
> > prtdiag ???
> > scswitch ??
> >
> 
> Sorry for the delay, back at work this week.
> 
> This is one of many crash boxes for customers to try out. I'll see what
> can be done WRT an OBSD boot.
> 
> Oh, and yes, the amount of RAM for the machine is measured in TB, not GB.

i'm a bit familiar with such amount
Really nice toy :) 

> scswitch: not found
You have to install Suncluster and it s not in the standard path :)

> prtconf output probably not relevant

prtconf -Pv has a nice output :)
cheers



Re: [ way... OT ] ho hum

2006-10-06 Thread Craig Skinner
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 05:59:17AM +0200, Johan SANCHEZ wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:18:25 +0100
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Skinner) wrote:
>
> > Another weekend at work:
> >
> > # uname -a
> > SunOS X 5.10 Generic_XX sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
> > # uname -X
> > System = SunOS
> > Node = XX
> > Release = 5.10
> > KernelID = Generic_XX
> > Machine = sun4u
> > BusType = 
> > Serial = 
> > Users = 
> > OEM# = 0
> > Origin# = 1
> > NumCPU = 144
> >
> > # id
> > uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
> >
> >
> >
> > Maybe one day this could have a great dmesg.., not to mention
> > the
> > rest of the cluster.
> >
> >
>
> Be patient :))
> psrinfo ???
> prtdiag ???
> scswitch ??
>

Sorry for the delay, back at work this week.

This is one of many crash boxes for customers to try out. I'll see what
can be done WRT an OBSD boot.

Oh, and yes, the amount of RAM for the machine is measured in TB, not GB.

# vmstat
 kthr  memorypagedisk  faults  cpu
 r b w   swap  free  re  mf pi po fr de sr s2 s2 s2 s2   in   sy   cs us sy id
 0 0 0 518073568 581736208 126 1152 2 11 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 1802 3613 809  0  1 99


# psrinfo
0   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
1   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
2   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
3   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
4   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
5   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
6   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
7   on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
32  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
33  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
34  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
35  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
36  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
37  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
38  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
39  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
64  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
65  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
66  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
67  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
68  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
69  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
70  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
71  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
96  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
97  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
98  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
99  on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
100 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
101 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
102 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
103 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
128 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
129 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
130 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
131 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
132 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
133 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
134 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
135 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
160 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
161 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
162 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
163 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
164 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
165 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
166 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
167 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
192 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
193 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
194 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
195 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
196 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
197 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
198 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
199 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
224 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
225 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
226 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
227 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
228 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
229 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
230 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
231 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
256 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
257 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
258 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
259 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
260 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
261 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
262 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
263 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
288 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
289 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
290 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
291 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
292 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
293 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
294 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:22
295 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:23
320 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:23
321 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:23
322 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:23
323 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:23
324 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:23
325 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:46:23
326 on-line   since 09/07/2006 15:4

Re: [ way... OT ] ho hum

2006-09-16 Thread Theo de Raadt
please do test the new code in a sparc64 container.

> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivery-Date: Sun Sep 10 13:24:11 2006
> Received: from shear.ucar.edu (shear.ucar.edu [192.43.244.163])
>   by cvs.openbsd.org (8.13.6/8.12.1) with ESMTP id k8AJOBsp024771
>   for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:24:11 -0600 (MDT)
> Received: from openbsd.org (localhost.ucar.edu [127.0.0.1])
>   by shear.ucar.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8AJLUDe005275;
>   Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:21:30 -0600 (MDT)
> Received: from monaro.kepax.co.uk (monaro.kepax.co.uk [84.19.247.237])
>   by shear.ucar.edu (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8AJIRZ1028994
>   for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:18:27 -0600 (MDT)
> Received: from oak.kepax.co.uk (oak.kepax.co.uk [192.168.253.20])
>   by monaro.kepax.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81E61A
>   for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:18:25 +0100 (BST)
> Received: by oak.kepax.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1970) id 753CD7606; Sun, 
> 10 Sep 2006 20:18:25 +0100 (BST)
> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:18:25 +0100
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: [ way... OT ] ho hum
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: misc@openbsd.org
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Skinner)
> X-Loop: misc@openbsd.org
> Precedence: list
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Another weekend at work:
> 
> # uname -a
> SunOS X 5.10 Generic_XX sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
> # uname -X
> System = SunOS
> Node = XX
> Release = 5.10
> KernelID = Generic_XX
> Machine = sun4u
> BusType = 
> Serial = 
> Users = 
> OEM# = 0
> Origin# = 1
> NumCPU = 144
> 
> # id
> uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe one day this could have a great dmesg.., not to mention the
> rest of the cluster.



Re: ho hum

2006-09-11 Thread Jason George
>Another weekend at work:
>
># uname -a
>SunOS X 5.10 Generic_XX sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
># uname -X
>System = SunOS
>Node = XX
>Release = 5.10
>KernelID = Generic_XX
>Machine = sun4u
>BusType = 
>Serial = 
>Users = 
>OEM# = 0
>Origin# = 1
>NumCPU = 144
>
># id
>uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
>
>
>
>Maybe one day this could have a great dmesg.., not to mention the
>rest of the cluster.


Back 2 weeks ago before Theo went hiking, he was fully prepared to bet at 
least one beer that the new sparc64 snapshot might even work in a container on 
a SunFire 15k.

I say you boot a snapshot and get back to us!



Re: [ way... OT ] ho hum

2006-09-10 Thread Johan SANCHEZ
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:18:25 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Skinner) wrote:

> Another weekend at work:
> 
> # uname -a
> SunOS X 5.10 Generic_XX sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
> # uname -X
> System = SunOS
> Node = XX
> Release = 5.10
> KernelID = Generic_XX
> Machine = sun4u
> BusType = 
> Serial = 
> Users = 
> OEM# = 0
> Origin# = 1
> NumCPU = 144
> 
> # id
> uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe one day this could have a great dmesg.., not to mention the
> rest of the cluster.
> 
> 

Be patient :))
psrinfo ???
prtdiag ???
scswitch ??



[ way... OT ] ho hum

2006-09-10 Thread Craig Skinner
Another weekend at work:

# uname -a
SunOS X 5.10 Generic_XX sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
# uname -X
System = SunOS
Node = XX
Release = 5.10
KernelID = Generic_XX
Machine = sun4u
BusType = 
Serial = 
Users = 
OEM# = 0
Origin# = 1
NumCPU = 144

# id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root)



Maybe one day this could have a great dmesg.., not to mention the
rest of the cluster.