Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?
On 13/05/06, Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: * Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 03:00]: Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier this week? no. Can I ask why his patch has been rejected? If your question is why it's not included in 3.9, then it's because OpenNTPD 3.9 is taken from OPENBSD_3_9 branch. http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ P.S. You didn't really expect a one-week-old new-feature patch to be incorporated into a release, did you? :)
Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?
* Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 05:17]: On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: * Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 03:00]: Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier this week? no. Can I ask why his patch has been rejected? I haven't made up my mind on this patch at all yet. -- BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/ OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ... Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
is openntpd 3.9 real?
hi, on you master ftp fanout and some mirrors (i didn't check all) there's an OpenNTPd archive with version no. 3.9. -- 05/11/2006 06:02 20,850 openntpd-3.9.tgz the changelog (ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenNTPD/ChangeLog/) doesn't mention such a release. also, on the openntpd.org site, the last release is 3.7. is this a real release of henning/etc... or is there something wrong? if this is the daily dev-version from cvs i suggest naming it different like something with openntpd-3.9-RCx or openntpd-3.9bXY. cu...
Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:26:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote: there's an OpenNTPd archive with version no. 3.9. -- 05/11/2006 06:02 20,850 openntpd-3.9.tgz [...] the changelog (ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenNTPD/ChangeLog/) doesn't mention such a release. also, on the openntpd.org site, the last release is 3.7. is this a real release of henning/etc... or is there something wrong? Yes it's real and corresponds to the OpenBSD 3.9 release, but as yet only the OpenBSD packages have been done. The ChangeLog is from the Portable branch and the Portable packages haven't been made yet because, well, I'm a slacker. They should be ready tomorrow. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually comes from bad judgement.
Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-12 14:36]: is this a real release of henning/etc... or is there something wrong? yes, it is real, I am waiting for the portable before I update the website tho. bgpd ospfd went 3.9 too -- BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/ OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ... Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:45:39PM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote: The ChangeLog is from the Portable branch and the Portable packages haven't been made yet because, well, I'm a slacker. They should be ready tomorrow. Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier this week?
Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?
* Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 03:00]: On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:45:39PM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote: The ChangeLog is from the Portable branch and the Portable packages haven't been made yet because, well, I'm a slacker. They should be ready tomorrow. Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier this week? no. -- BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/ OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ... Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: is openntpd 3.9 real?
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: * Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 03:00]: Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier this week? no. Can I ask why his patch has been rejected?
