Re: pkg_add -r question?

2005-07-30 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 04:45:55PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> The way it works now, it seems like you must manually 
> compare the old packages & new packages, build the list of new packages by 
> name, before using pkg_add -r.

Yes, it's even one of the things on my todo list.



Re: pkg_add -r question?

2005-07-30 Thread Clint M. Sand
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 04:45:55PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> After experimenting with pkg_add -r on a 3.6 -> 3.7 upgrade, it is 
> **NICE**!!
> 
> One question, however, .. is there a way to use the *OLD* package name, 
> instead of the *NEW* package name? pkg_add would then query PKG_PATH for an 
> updated version? The way it works now, it seems like you must manually 
> compare the old packages & new packages, build the list of new packages by 
> name, before using pkg_add -r.
> 
>   Lee


 /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date



pkg_add -r question?

2005-07-30 Thread L. V. Lammert

After experimenting with pkg_add -r on a 3.6 -> 3.7 upgrade, it is **NICE**!!

One question, however, .. is there a way to use the *OLD* package name, 
instead of the *NEW* package name? pkg_add would then query PKG_PATH for an 
updated version? The way it works now, it seems like you must manually 
compare the old packages & new packages, build the list of new packages by 
name, before using pkg_add -r.


Lee