Re: printing change over the ages
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 07:20:56 -0700 Theo de Raadt wrote: > [...] > > Having read CUPS code, and aware of how things interface withit, it is > something I definately try to shy away from. > That was what I had thought was the case. > But it is true that our lp suite receives insufficient maintainance. Which doesn't sound like an endorsement of CUPS, so I will stand fast. -- Edward Ahlsen-Girard Ft Walton Beach, FL
Re: printing change over the ages
> Saturday I saw this line on tech from Theo: > >lpd lpr lpq lprm (yes, legacy software, but still) > > Is CUPS become more "the thing" among developers? Having read CUPS code, and aware of how things interface withit, it is something I definately try to shy away from. But it is true that our lp suite receives insufficient maintainance.
printing change over the ages
Saturday I saw this line on tech from Theo: lpd lpr lpq lprm (yes, legacy software, but still) Is CUPS become more "the thing" among developers? -- Edward Ahlsen-Girard Ft Walton Beach, FL