Re: sh /etc/netstart interface counter intuitive behaviour with multiple inet aliases 6.4 and 6.3

2018-12-07 Thread Radek
I have tried '-inet' on 6.3/i386 firewall/GW/VPN/etc.. adding 4 aliases (public 
IPs) and then removing 2 of them. If_driver was vr(4). I did it few times over 
SSH without any meltdown of the network. Everything seems to work as expected.

$ cat /etc/hostname.vr0
-inet
inet A.B.C.77 255.255.254.0
inet alias A.B.C.76 255.255.255.255 NONE description "Alias76"
inet alias A.B.C.75 255.255.255.255 NONE description "Alias75"
inet alias A.B.C.74 255.255.255.255 NONE description "Alias74"
inet alias A.B.C.73 255.255.255.255 NONE description "Alias73"

On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 06:48:35 +1100
tomr  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 12/8/18 6:09 AM, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Hi Florian,
> > 
> > i had the inet address as the first line ...
> > and then all the inet alias lines were after that...
> > the behaviour was  as described...
> > Thanks for the suggestion though
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 18:48, Florian Obser  wrote:
> 
> I think Florian was saying you could use '-inet' to remove *all* inet
> addresses first, different to what you probably have already.
> 
> Maybe something like the following would work to remove any aliases not
> set explicitly in hostname.if (with reduced risk of melting the network)
> 
> in hostname.vio4:
> !/usr/local/bin/clean_ifaliases.sh \$if
> 
> in /usr/local/bin/clean_ifaliases.sh:
> #!/bin/ksh
> for addr in $(ifconfig $1 | awk '/^[[:blank:]]inet/ {print $2}') ; do
> egrep "^(alias|inet) $addr" /etc/hostname.$1 >/dev/null || ifconfig $1
> delete $addr ; done
> 
> 
> 
> hth
> 
> 
> >> One possible workaround is putting
> >> -inet as the first line in /etc/hostname.vio4
> >> It will nuke all v4 addresses and re-add them.
> >>
> >> Depending on your usecase this might work for you or it might melt
> >> down your whole network ;)
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +, Tom Smyth wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Im running a router with multiple ips on an interface using the
> >>> inet alias
> >>>
> >>> issue:
> >>> when commenting out configured  aliases on hostname.if
> >>> after running sh /etc/netstart vio4
> >>>
> >>> if you run ifconfig vio4 after the restart of the interface
> >>> the old aliases that were commented still appear in ifconfig output ahead
> >>> of the first ip address configured in the /etc/hostname.vio4 file.
> >>>
> >>> ifconfig  before commenting  out   10.134.91.253  in hostname.vio4
> >>> is listed below
> >>> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> >>> lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> >>> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> >>> media: Ethernet autoselect
> >>> status: active
> >>> inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> >>> inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> >>> inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> >>> inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> >>> inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> >>> inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> >>> inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> >>> inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> >>> inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> >>> inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> >>> inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> >>> inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> >>> inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> >>> inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> >>> inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> >>> inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> >>> inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> >>> inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> >>> inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> >>> inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> >>> inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> >>> inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
> >>> inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
> >>> inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
> >>> inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247
> >>> inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> >>> inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> after commenting out the last 2 inet aliases , and running sh 
> >>> /etc/netstart vio4
> >>>
> >>> the ifconfig output is as follows  (i have highlighted with ***  the 
> >>> addresses
> >>> which I think should have been removed
> >>>
> >>> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> >>> 

Re: sh /etc/netstart interface counter intuitive behaviour with multiple inet aliases 6.4 and 6.3

2018-12-07 Thread tomr



On 12/8/18 6:09 AM, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> 
> i had the inet address as the first line ...
> and then all the inet alias lines were after that...
> the behaviour was  as described...
> Thanks for the suggestion though
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 18:48, Florian Obser  wrote:

I think Florian was saying you could use '-inet' to remove *all* inet
addresses first, different to what you probably have already.

Maybe something like the following would work to remove any aliases not
set explicitly in hostname.if (with reduced risk of melting the network)

in hostname.vio4:
!/usr/local/bin/clean_ifaliases.sh \$if

in /usr/local/bin/clean_ifaliases.sh:
#!/bin/ksh
for addr in $(ifconfig $1 | awk '/^[[:blank:]]inet/ {print $2}') ; do
egrep "^(alias|inet) $addr" /etc/hostname.$1 >/dev/null || ifconfig $1
delete $addr ; done



hth


>> One possible workaround is putting
>> -inet as the first line in /etc/hostname.vio4
>> It will nuke all v4 addresses and re-add them.
>>
>> Depending on your usecase this might work for you or it might melt
>> down your whole network ;)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +, Tom Smyth wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Im running a router with multiple ips on an interface using the
>>> inet alias
>>>
>>> issue:
>>> when commenting out configured  aliases on hostname.if
>>> after running sh /etc/netstart vio4
>>>
>>> if you run ifconfig vio4 after the restart of the interface
>>> the old aliases that were commented still appear in ifconfig output ahead
>>> of the first ip address configured in the /etc/hostname.vio4 file.
>>>
>>> ifconfig  before commenting  out   10.134.91.253  in hostname.vio4
>>> is listed below
>>> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>>> lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
>>> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
>>> media: Ethernet autoselect
>>> status: active
>>> inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
>>> inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
>>> inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
>>> inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
>>> inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
>>> inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
>>> inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
>>> inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
>>> inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
>>> inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
>>> inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
>>> inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
>>> inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
>>> inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
>>> inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
>>> inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
>>> inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
>>> inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
>>> inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
>>> inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
>>> inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
>>> inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
>>> inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
>>> inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
>>> inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247
>>> inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
>>> inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
>>> 
>>>
>>> after commenting out the last 2 inet aliases , and running sh /etc/netstart 
>>> vio4
>>>
>>> the ifconfig output is as follows  (i have highlighted with ***  the 
>>> addresses
>>> which I think should have been removed
>>>
>>> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>>> lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
>>> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
>>> media: Ethernet autoselect
>>> status: active
>>> ** inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
>>> ** inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
>>> inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
>>> inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
>>> inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
>>> inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
>>> inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
>>> inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
>>> inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
>>>   

Re: sh /etc/netstart interface counter intuitive behaviour with multiple inet aliases 6.4 and 6.3

2018-12-07 Thread Tom Smyth
Hi Florian,

i had the inet address as the first line ...
and then all the inet alias lines were after that...
the behaviour was  as described...
Thanks for the suggestion though
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 18:48, Florian Obser  wrote:
>
> One possible workaround is putting
> -inet as the first line in /etc/hostname.vio4
> It will nuke all v4 addresses and re-add them.
>
> Depending on your usecase this might work for you or it might melt
> down your whole network ;)
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Im running a router with multiple ips on an interface using the
> > inet alias
> >
> > issue:
> > when commenting out configured  aliases on hostname.if
> > after running sh /etc/netstart vio4
> >
> > if you run ifconfig vio4 after the restart of the interface
> > the old aliases that were commented still appear in ifconfig output ahead
> > of the first ip address configured in the /etc/hostname.vio4 file.
> >
> > ifconfig  before commenting  out   10.134.91.253  in hostname.vio4
> > is listed below
> > vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> > index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> > media: Ethernet autoselect
> > status: active
> > inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> > inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> > inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> > inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> > inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> > inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> > inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> > inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> > inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> > inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> > inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> > inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> > inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> > inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> > inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> > inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> > inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> > inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> > inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> > inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> > inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> > inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
> > inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
> > inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
> > inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247
> > inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> > inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> > 
> >
> > after commenting out the last 2 inet aliases , and running sh /etc/netstart 
> > vio4
> >
> > the ifconfig output is as follows  (i have highlighted with ***  the 
> > addresses
> > which I think should have been removed
> >
> > vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> > index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> > media: Ethernet autoselect
> > status: active
> > ** inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> > ** inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> > inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> > inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> > inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> > inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> > inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> > inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> > inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> > inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> > inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> > inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> > inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> > inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> > inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> > inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> > inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> > inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 

Re: sh /etc/netstart interface counter intuitive behaviour with multiple inet aliases 6.4 and 6.3

2018-12-07 Thread Florian Obser
One possible workaround is putting
-inet as the first line in /etc/hostname.vio4
It will nuke all v4 addresses and re-add them.

Depending on your usecase this might work for you or it might melt
down your whole network ;)

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Im running a router with multiple ips on an interface using the
> inet alias
> 
> issue:
> when commenting out configured  aliases on hostname.if
> after running sh /etc/netstart vio4
> 
> if you run ifconfig vio4 after the restart of the interface
> the old aliases that were commented still appear in ifconfig output ahead
> of the first ip address configured in the /etc/hostname.vio4 file.
> 
> ifconfig  before commenting  out   10.134.91.253  in hostname.vio4
> is listed below
> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> media: Ethernet autoselect
> status: active
> inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
> inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
> inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
> inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247
> inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> 
> 
> after commenting out the last 2 inet aliases , and running sh /etc/netstart 
> vio4
> 
> the ifconfig output is as follows  (i have highlighted with ***  the addresses
> which I think should have been removed
> 
> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> media: Ethernet autoselect
> status: active
> ** inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> ** inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> 

Re: sh /etc/netstart interface counter intuitive behaviour with multiple inet aliases 6.4 and 6.3

2018-12-07 Thread Tom Smyth
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 13:09, Martin Pieuchot  wrote:
>
> On 06/12/18(Thu) 22:49, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Im running a router with multiple ips on an interface using the
> > inet alias
> >
> > issue:
> > when commenting out configured  aliases on hostname.if
> > after running sh /etc/netstart vio4
> >
> > if you run ifconfig vio4 after the restart of the interface
> > the old aliases that were commented still appear in ifconfig output ahead
> > of the first ip address configured in the /etc/hostname.vio4 file.
> >
> > ifconfig  before commenting  out   10.134.91.253  in hostname.vio4
> > is listed below
> > vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> > index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> > media: Ethernet autoselect
> > status: active
> > inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> > inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> > inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> > inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> > inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> > inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> > inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> > inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> > inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> > inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> > inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> > inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> > inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> > inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> > inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> > inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> > inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> > inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> > inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> > inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> > inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> > inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
> > inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
> > inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
> > inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247
> > inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> > inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> > 
> >
> > after commenting out the last 2 inet aliases , and running sh /etc/netstart 
> > vio4
> >
> > the ifconfig output is as follows  (i have highlighted with ***  the 
> > addresses
> > which I think should have been removed
> >
> > vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> > index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> > media: Ethernet autoselect
> > status: active
> > ** inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> > ** inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> > inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> > inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> > inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> > inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> > inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> > inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> > inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> > inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> > inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> > inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> > inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> > inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> > inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> > inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> > inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> > inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> > inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> > inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> > inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> > inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> > inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> >   

Re: sh /etc/netstart interface counter intuitive behaviour with multiple inet aliases 6.4 and 6.3

2018-12-07 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 06/12/18(Thu) 22:49, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Im running a router with multiple ips on an interface using the
> inet alias
> 
> issue:
> when commenting out configured  aliases on hostname.if
> after running sh /etc/netstart vio4
> 
> if you run ifconfig vio4 after the restart of the interface
> the old aliases that were commented still appear in ifconfig output ahead
> of the first ip address configured in the /etc/hostname.vio4 file.
> 
> ifconfig  before commenting  out   10.134.91.253  in hostname.vio4
> is listed below
> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> media: Ethernet autoselect
> status: active
> inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
> inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
> inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
> inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247
> inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> 
> 
> after commenting out the last 2 inet aliases , and running sh /etc/netstart 
> vio4
> 
> the ifconfig output is as follows  (i have highlighted with ***  the addresses
> which I think should have been removed
> 
> vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> media: Ethernet autoselect
> status: active
> ** inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
> ** inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
> inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
> inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
> inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
> inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
> inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
> inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
> inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
> inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
> inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
> inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
> inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
> inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
> inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
> inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
> inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
> inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
> inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
> inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
> inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
> inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
> inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
> inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
> inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
> inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
> inet 10.134.91.245 

sh /etc/netstart interface counter intuitive behaviour with multiple inet aliases 6.4 and 6.3

2018-12-06 Thread Tom Smyth
Hello,

Im running a router with multiple ips on an interface using the
inet alias

issue:
when commenting out configured  aliases on hostname.if
after running sh /etc/netstart vio4

if you run ifconfig vio4 after the restart of the interface
the old aliases that were commented still appear in ifconfig output ahead
of the first ip address configured in the /etc/hostname.vio4 file.

ifconfig  before commenting  out   10.134.91.253  in hostname.vio4
is listed below
vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: active
inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247
inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255


after commenting out the last 2 inet aliases , and running sh /etc/netstart vio4

the ifconfig output is as follows  (i have highlighted with ***  the addresses
which I think should have been removed

vio4: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 16:2c:a4:f2:b4:e3
index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: active
** inet 10.134.91.249 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.251
** inet 10.134.91.253 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.255
inet 10.94.0.1 netmask 0x broadcast 10.94.255.255
inet 10.134.91.65 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.67
inet 10.134.91.69 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.71
inet 10.134.91.73 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.75
inet 10.134.91.85 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.87
inet 10.134.91.89 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.91
inet 10.134.91.93 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.95
inet 10.134.91.161 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.163
inet 10.134.91.165 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.167
inet 10.134.91.169 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.171
inet 10.134.91.173 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.175
inet 10.134.91.193 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.195
inet 10.134.91.197 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.199
inet 10.134.91.201 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.203
inet 10.134.91.205 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.207
inet 10.134.91.209 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.211
inet 10.134.91.213 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.215
inet 10.134.91.217 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.219
inet 10.134.91.221 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.223
inet 10.134.91.225 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.227
inet 10.134.91.229 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.231
inet 10.134.91.233 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.235
inet 10.134.91.237 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.239
inet 10.134.91.241 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.243
inet 10.134.91.245 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 10.134.91.247

This behaviour is counter intuitive  as it is different to sh /etc/netstart
behaviour on the configuration of  inet addresses
im wondiring is this a feature or a bug ...  or