[mkgmap-dev] Options
Hello Gerd, sorry for the delay. better than nothing simply means that this is actually the only possibility, to create Points along a way to mark a hiking trail based on relations. In fact this is not really satiesfying but it is actually the only way. That's the reason why i said better than nothing. OSMCOMPOSER-Software which is a type of frontend to mkgamp has a builtin preprocessor, which is able to create points along way relation. Here you have the possibilty to configure which relations you wanna use e.g hiking|cycling|MTB and the minimum lenght, of way beeing part or a relation to get a poi. If there are multiple routes, the pois will be distributed, to fit in a way that they are all visible. Ok, it's clear, depending on length and amount of pois, they will overlap. regards Gert From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Fri Apr 24 06:35:07 BST 2015 Hi Gert, yes, I think it must be useful, I also see it in Minkos styles at http://www.openfietsmap.nl/ I don't fully understand the better than nothing part . The current code adds a POI to each point, so each point has a mkgmap:line2poitype=* tag with values start,end,mid, or inner for the rest. The option should be handled with great care, it is likely to produce a large number of POI for highly detailed ways created by some imports. I already thought about an addtional parameter for the option, something like --add-pois-to-lines=n where n gives a value in meter for the minimum distance between two generated POI when the way has more than 3 points. Gerd ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne
Hi Gerd Can't test the new functions until monday next week, i'm out for a motorcycle tour :-) Bernd Hier sollte eigentlich eine Signatur stehen. -Original Message- From: Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Sent: Di., 28 Apr. 2015 8:44 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Bernd, the problem was fixed with r3549. With r3550 I've implemented the new special tag mkgmap:numbers, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmaprev=3550 for details. Gerd Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:59:30 -0700 From: gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Bernd, forget it, I was able to reproduce the error message with a download of this area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=50.06119lon=14.40275 Gerd GerdP wrote Hi Bernd, please post a link to the file 65030278.o5m Gerd Bernd Weigelt wrote Hi Gerd There was only one message for my dach extract, all other extract are build without any noise. SCHWERWIEGEND (ExtNumbers): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030278.o5m: internal error, worst house not found id=4672706, Na Neklance[731(10), 727(10), 805/8(10)][] 2031/1(0) The option --x-name-service-roads=n seems to be no really problem, while enabled, but i'll remove it from my options for the next build, too. ;-) Bernd Am Montag, 27. April 2015, 20:07:54 schrieb Gerd Petermann: Hi Bernd, pleasse note one important change: I've removed the option --x-name-service-roads=n, it is no longer optional, mkgmap tries to find a name for roads with house numbers. This leads to some special effects, e.g. when a small unnamed footway is closer to the house than the named service road. I think about a new tag like mkgmap:number=false that tells mkgmap that a road should not be used for address search, e.g. cycleways or motorways. This would also speed up the search for the closest roads. Gerd From: weigelt.bernd@ To: mkgmap-dev@.org Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:58:45 +0200 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Gerd i'll give it a try asap thx Bernd Am Sonntag, 26. April 2015, 16:37:35 schrieb Gerd Petermann: please try r3546, I think it is stable again. I had to change the program logic to make sure that special cases with interpolation ways do not causes assertions. I have still some known problems, esp. the program logic for housenumbers assumes now that city/ zip code info attached to the housenumbers is written to the img file, but that doesn't happen yet (and is quite complicated as it seems to require big changes in the existing program logic) so address search for roads at city boundaries might still not work. -- amarok2 now playing: ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@.org http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/error-message-in-Cologne-tp5841730p5842108.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:city empty in large cities
Hi Gerd,
I was a bit wrong with my analysis of Ottawa and Toronto. Toronto and
Ottawa should be admin level 8 and the 'cities' within Toronto and Ottawa
should be admin level 9 (as Orleans was already tagged). I've corrected the
labelling issues in OSM but I didn't add the missing 'city' boundaries
inside Ottawa.
I've attached a patch that corrects address search for Toronto and Ottawa.
You'll need updated bounds data for this to work but I have confirmed that
it's working. It would be nice to get this included in mkgamp.
Thanks, Ben
diff --git a/resources/styles/default/inc/address b/resources/styles/default/inc/address
index f01b26e..4a85973 100644
--- a/resources/styles/default/inc/address
+++ b/resources/styles/default/inc/address
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ mkgmap:country=CHE mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level8=* { set mkgmap:city='$
# Canada
mkgmap:country=CAN mkgmap:region!=* mkgmap:admin_level4=* { set mkgmap:region='${mkgmap:admin_level4}' }
+mkgmap:country=CAN mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level8=Toronto mkgmap:admin_level9=* { set mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level9}' }
+mkgmap:country=CAN mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level8=Ottawa mkgmap:admin_level9=* { set mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level9}' }
mkgmap:country=CAN mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level8=* { set mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level8|subst:City of }' }
# United States
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne
Hi Bernd, no problem, have fun ! Gerd Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:48:53 +0200 From: weigelt.be...@web.de To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Gerd Can't test the new functions until monday next week, i'm out for a motorcycle tour :-) Bernd Hier sollte eigentlich eine Signatur stehen. -Original Message- From: Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Sent: Di., 28 Apr. 2015 8:44 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Bernd, the problem was fixed with r3549. With r3550 I've implemented the new special tag mkgmap:numbers, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmaprev=3550 for details. Gerd Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:59:30 -0700 From: gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Bernd, forget it, I was able to reproduce the error message with a download of this area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=50.06119lon=14.40275 Gerd GerdP wrote Hi Bernd, please post a link to the file 65030278.o5m Gerd Bernd Weigelt wrote Hi Gerd There was only one message for my dach extract, all other extract are build without any noise. SCHWERWIEGEND (ExtNumbers): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030278.o5m: internal error, worst house not found id=4672706, Na Neklance[731(10), 727(10), 805/8(10)][] 2031/1(0) The option --x-name-service-roads=n seems to be no really problem, while enabled, but i'll remove it from my options for the next build, too. ;-) Bernd Am Montag, 27. April 2015, 20:07:54 schrieb Gerd Petermann: Hi Bernd, pleasse note one important change: I've removed the option --x-name-service-roads=n, it is no longer optional, mkgmap tries to find a name for roads with house numbers. This leads to some special effects, e.g. when a small unnamed footway is closer to the house than the named service road. I think about a new tag like mkgmap:number=false that tells mkgmap that a road should not be used for address search, e.g. cycleways or motorways. This would also speed up the search for the closest roads. Gerd From: weigelt.bernd@ To: mkgmap-dev@.org Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:58:45 +0200 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Gerd i'll give it a try asap thx Bernd Am Sonntag, 26. April 2015, 16:37:35 schrieb Gerd Petermann: please try r3546, I think it is stable again. I had to change the program logic to make sure that special cases with interpolation ways do not causes assertions. I have still some known problems, esp. the program logic for housenumbers assumes now that city/ zip code info attached to the housenumbers is written to the img file, but that doesn't happen yet (and is quite complicated as it seems to require big changes in the existing program logic) so address search for roads at city boundaries might still not work. -- amarok2 now playing: ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@.org http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/error-message-in-Cologne-tp5841730p5842108.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:city empty in large cities
Hi Gerd, Yes, that's correct. The patch will have no effect until the bounds are updated to OSM data that's newer than 27 April 2015. Thanks, Ben On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Ben, thanks for the patch. Just to make sure: The additional rules have no effect until one has updated bounds, so I can commit that without causing trouble, right? Gerd -- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:43:03 +0200 From: b...@bagu.org To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:city empty in large cities Hi Gerd, I was a bit wrong with my analysis of Ottawa and Toronto. Toronto and Ottawa should be admin level 8 and the 'cities' within Toronto and Ottawa should be admin level 9 (as Orleans was already tagged). I've corrected the labelling issues in OSM but I didn't add the missing 'city' boundaries inside Ottawa. I've attached a patch that corrects address search for Toronto and Ottawa. You'll need updated bounds data for this to work but I have confirmed that it's working. It would be nice to get this included in mkgamp. Thanks, Ben ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne
Hi Bernd, the problem was fixed with r3549. With r3550 I've implemented the new special tag mkgmap:numbers, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmaprev=3550 for details. Gerd Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:59:30 -0700 From: gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Bernd, forget it, I was able to reproduce the error message with a download of this area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=50.06119lon=14.40275 Gerd GerdP wrote Hi Bernd, please post a link to the file 65030278.o5m Gerd Bernd Weigelt wrote Hi Gerd There was only one message for my dach extract, all other extract are build without any noise. SCHWERWIEGEND (ExtNumbers): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030278.o5m: internal error, worst house not found id=4672706, Na Neklance[731(10), 727(10), 805/8(10)][] 2031/1(0) The option --x-name-service-roads=n seems to be no really problem, while enabled, but i'll remove it from my options for the next build, too. ;-) Bernd Am Montag, 27. April 2015, 20:07:54 schrieb Gerd Petermann: Hi Bernd, pleasse note one important change: I've removed the option --x-name-service-roads=n, it is no longer optional, mkgmap tries to find a name for roads with house numbers. This leads to some special effects, e.g. when a small unnamed footway is closer to the house than the named service road. I think about a new tag like mkgmap:number=false that tells mkgmap that a road should not be used for address search, e.g. cycleways or motorways. This would also speed up the search for the closest roads. Gerd From: weigelt.bernd@ To: mkgmap-dev@.org Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:58:45 +0200 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] error message in Cologne Hi Gerd i'll give it a try asap thx Bernd Am Sonntag, 26. April 2015, 16:37:35 schrieb Gerd Petermann: please try r3546, I think it is stable again. I had to change the program logic to make sure that special cases with interpolation ways do not causes assertions. I have still some known problems, esp. the program logic for housenumbers assumes now that city/ zip code info attached to the housenumbers is written to the img file, but that doesn't happen yet (and is quite complicated as it seems to require big changes in the existing program logic) so address search for roads at city boundaries might still not work. -- amarok2 now playing: ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@.org http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/error-message-in-Cologne-tp5841730p5842108.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:city empty in large cities
Hi Ben, thanks for the patch. Just to make sure: The additional rules have no effect until one has updated bounds, so I can commit that without causing trouble, right? Gerd Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:43:03 +0200 From: b...@bagu.org To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:city empty in large cities Hi Gerd, I was a bit wrong with my analysis of Ottawa and Toronto. Toronto and Ottawa should be admin level 8 and the 'cities' within Toronto and Ottawa should be admin level 9 (as Orleans was already tagged). I've corrected the labelling issues in OSM but I didn't add the missing 'city' boundaries inside Ottawa. I've attached a patch that corrects address search for Toronto and Ottawa. You'll need updated bounds data for this to work but I have confirmed that it's working. It would be nice to get this included in mkgamp. Thanks, Ben ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
