Re: [mkgmap-dev] How can I force the inners of a boundary relation to display?
Greg,
I do use a fill. It isn't a solid color but a small letter "R" to stand for
Reserve. That does show me where the inners are in a fashion but I would
like to experiment with getting them to display with some sort of a line.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 10:54 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Dave Swarthout writes:
>
> > I've been adding large Alaskan National Wildlife Refuges to OSM. The
> > boundaries weren't displaying so I added a directive in my relations file
> > modeled after the administrative boundary code in the default style that
> > adds a name to protected areas like so:
> >
> > (type=boundary | type=multipolygon) & boundary=protected_area & name=*
> > { apply
> > {
> > set mkgmap:boundary_name='$(mkgmap:boundary_name)/${name}' |
> '${name}';
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Then in my lines file I included a line style defined as:
> > boundary=nature_reserve
> > | boundary=protected_area [0x10e12 resolution 19].
> >
> > This works well but the lines bounding the inner areas of these relations
> > do not render. How can I make them display?
>
> Not what you asked, but I reject the notion that because the tag is
> "boundary=protected_area" that what should be rendered is a line on the
> boundary, rather than an area. I view this tag as denoting something
> about the area within the polygon -- basically landuse=conservation
> and/or leisure=nature_reserve.
>
> So I would treat these boundary tags as being about the area and use a
> green fill, and not focus so much on the boundary proper.
>
> I realize that mine is not a universally-held view :-)
>
--
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] How can I force the inners of a boundary relation to display?
Dave Swarthout writes:
> I've been adding large Alaskan National Wildlife Refuges to OSM. The
> boundaries weren't displaying so I added a directive in my relations file
> modeled after the administrative boundary code in the default style that
> adds a name to protected areas like so:
>
> (type=boundary | type=multipolygon) & boundary=protected_area & name=*
> { apply
> {
> set mkgmap:boundary_name='$(mkgmap:boundary_name)/${name}' | '${name}';
> }
> }
>
> Then in my lines file I included a line style defined as:
> boundary=nature_reserve
> | boundary=protected_area [0x10e12 resolution 19].
>
> This works well but the lines bounding the inner areas of these relations
> do not render. How can I make them display?
Not what you asked, but I reject the notion that because the tag is
"boundary=protected_area" that what should be rendered is a line on the
boundary, rather than an area. I view this tag as denoting something
about the area within the polygon -- basically landuse=conservation
and/or leisure=nature_reserve.
So I would treat these boundary tags as being about the area and use a
green fill, and not focus so much on the boundary proper.
I realize that mine is not a universally-held view :-)
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] How can I force the inners of a boundary relation to display?
Hi,
I've been adding large Alaskan National Wildlife Refuges to OSM. The
boundaries weren't displaying so I added a directive in my relations file
modeled after the administrative boundary code in the default style that
adds a name to protected areas like so:
(type=boundary | type=multipolygon) & boundary=protected_area & name=*
{ apply
{
set mkgmap:boundary_name='$(mkgmap:boundary_name)/${name}' | '${name}';
}
}
Then in my lines file I included a line style defined as:
boundary=nature_reserve
| boundary=protected_area [0x10e12 resolution 19].
This works well but the lines bounding the inner areas of these relations
do not render. How can I make them display?
Many thanks
Dave
--
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] default style improvements
I see there is no distinction between a pedestrian highway and a footway/path yet. On the generic new map I use 0x11 for pedestrian highways and 0x10 for cycleways, but you can do the opposite. Both are routable lines and visible on most (?) devices. Also for steps I use another routable line (0x13). You can also think of adding paved footways and paths to the pedestrian lines, so the distinction between paved and non paved are better visisble. I also recommend to set the colour of the pedestrian typ to the same grey as squares. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
