Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
Hi Jan
I don't think you'll be able to do what you hope for.
Each possible POI comes either:
a) direct from a point
b) from a polygon if --add-pois-to-areas, setting mkgmap:area2poi=true
This happens regardless of any rules etc.
All you can do in the points rule processing is choose to display a POI
or not.
For a direct POI, you can test if is_in any of the types of polygon and
suppress it if you choose.
For an area2poi POI, it is almost certain that it is_in(its own type)
but you can exclude it if is_in(the other types).
There is no is_in() test for being in a polygon (of some type) that is
in another polygon (of same or any other type).
It is clearer to apply these tests to the POI generation rule rather
than {delete} the tag to be tested. For {delete} to work, it has to be
done before the rule that might generated the [POI]. It is obscure to
show the {delete} afterwards, even though, with careful rule ordering,
the same effect could be achieved.
Does this make sense?
Ticker
On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 18:04 +0100, jan meisters wrote:
> (Still problems with attachments. Now with link)
>
> Hi Ticker,
>
> I want to ask for relevant swimmings, one after another, and after
> every rule exclude further swimmings inside aleady matched areas.
> In the end the style should dismiss e.g. leisure=swimming_pools which
> lay in a (leisure=stadium & sport=swimming) already matched:
>
> 1.leisure=stadium & sport=swimming {name '${name} (stadium
> swim)‘ | '(stadium swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
> sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
> is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
> 2.leisure=water_park & sport=swimming {name '${name}
> (waterpark swim)‘ | '(waterpark swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
> sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, water_park,in_or_on)=true &
> is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
> 3.leisure=swimming_pool & sport=swimming {name '${name} (pool
> swim)‘ | ‚(pool swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
> sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, swimming_pool,in_or_on)=true &
> is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
> 4.…
>
> With the above ruleset I have correct results for nodes so far, but
> not for polygons.
> The is_in-rule seems to lack the epression of is_n(leisure=stadium &
> sport=swimming), instead matches a polygons own swimming as well -
> what I don´t want.
> But I´ve got no clue how to write it.
>
> In swim.osm the surrounding left stadium has swimming, the right one
> not. Inside both stadium, water_park and sports_centre as area and
> poi. (See http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/500 for the following
> screenshots)
>
> Above ruleset gives this: 1-result.jpg
> In left stadium pois for stadium/swim (area, area inside, poi
> inside), nothing else: correct.
> In right stadium pois for all swim inside except for the areas:
> wrong.
>
> What I expect is this: 2-expected.jpg
> Left as before, but In the right pois for all swim inside including
> areas.
>
> Hope I made it clearer
> Jan
>
>
> > Am 21.02.2021 um 13:01 schrieb Ticker Berkin <
> > rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>:
> >
> > Hi Jan
> >
> > I'm slightly confused as to what you are trying to do here when you
> > say
> > it works for nodes but not polygons.
> >
> > After you've output a POI from the first rule what are you trying
> > to
> > do?
> >
> > Ticker
> >
> > On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 10:42 +0100, jan meisters wrote:
> > > Hi Gerd,
> > >
> > > my first impression didn´t get trough further test.
> > >
> > > This works for nodes, but not for polygons:
> > > leisure=stadium & sport=swimming [0x2d09 resolution 24]
> > > sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
> > > is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
> > >
> > > It matches it´s own swimming tag as well, not only when stadium
> > > is
> > > given.
> > > Tried various spellings/brackets, but I can´t get it to work for
> > > stadium and swimming as a combination only.
> > > I guess we don´t have a syntax for this?
> > >
> > > Attached a small example.
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 16.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb jan meisters :
> > > >
> > > > Hi Gerd,
> > > >
> > > > so easy - that works!
> > > > Thanks for helping me out
> > > > Jan
> > > >
> > > > > Am 16.02.2021 um 17:44 schrieb Gerd Petermann <
> > > > > gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Jan,
> > > > >
> > > > > is_in(leisure,park,...) & is_in(sport,swimming,...)
> > > > > should work.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gerd
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im
> > > > > Auftrag von jan meisters
> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 17:31
> > > > > An: Development list for mkgmap
> > > > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Joris,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks for stating - I guessed something like that.
> > > > >
> > > > > What I want is to is_in for a tag-combination, e.g.
> > > > > leisure=park
> >
Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
(Still problems with attachments. Now with link)
Hi Ticker,
I want to ask for relevant swimmings, one after another, and after every rule
exclude further swimmings inside aleady matched areas.
In the end the style should dismiss e.g. leisure=swimming_pools which lay in a
(leisure=stadium & sport=swimming) already matched:
1. leisure=stadium & sport=swimming {name '${name} (stadium swim)‘ |
'(stadium swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
2. leisure=water_park & sport=swimming {name '${name} (waterpark swim)‘ |
'(waterpark swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, water_park,in_or_on)=true &
is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
3. leisure=swimming_pool & sport=swimming {name '${name} (pool swim)‘ |
‚(pool swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, swimming_pool,in_or_on)=true &
is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
4. …
With the above ruleset I have correct results for nodes so far, but not for
polygons.
The is_in-rule seems to lack the epression of is_n(leisure=stadium &
sport=swimming), instead matches a polygons own swimming as well - what I don´t
want.
But I´ve got no clue how to write it.
In swim.osm the surrounding left stadium has swimming, the right one not.
Inside both stadium, water_park and sports_centre as area and poi. (See
http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/500 for the following screenshots)
Above ruleset gives this: 1-result.jpg
In left stadium pois for stadium/swim (area, area inside, poi inside), nothing
else: correct.
In right stadium pois for all swim inside except for the areas: wrong.
What I expect is this: 2-expected.jpg
Left as before, but In the right pois for all swim inside including areas.
Hope I made it clearer
Jan
> Am 21.02.2021 um 13:01 schrieb Ticker Berkin >:
>
> Hi Jan
>
> I'm slightly confused as to what you are trying to do here when you say
> it works for nodes but not polygons.
>
> After you've output a POI from the first rule what are you trying to
> do?
>
> Ticker
>
> On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 10:42 +0100, jan meisters wrote:
>> Hi Gerd,
>>
>> my first impression didn´t get trough further test.
>>
>> This works for nodes, but not for polygons:
>> leisure=stadium & sport=swimming [0x2d09 resolution 24]
>> sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
>> is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
>>
>> It matches it´s own swimming tag as well, not only when stadium is
>> given.
>> Tried various spellings/brackets, but I can´t get it to work for
>> stadium and swimming as a combination only.
>> I guess we don´t have a syntax for this?
>>
>> Attached a small example.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb jan meisters >> >:
>>>
>>> Hi Gerd,
>>>
>>> so easy - that works!
>>> Thanks for helping me out
>>> Jan
>>>
Am 16.02.2021 um 17:44 schrieb Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com >:
Hi Jan,
is_in(leisure,park,...) & is_in(sport,swimming,...)
should work.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev >>> > im
Auftrag von jan meisters mailto:jan_...@gmx.net>>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 17:31
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
Hi Joris,
thanks for stating - I guessed something like that.
What I want is to is_in for a tag-combination, e.g. leisure=park
& sport=swimming.
I have a poi-rule for park first and further want to
exclude swimmings inside matching polygons.
Do I have another option to define the combination so that it can
be seen by is_in?
Thanks
Jan
> Am 16.02.2021 um 14:48 schrieb Joris Bo >:
>
> Hi Jan
>
> As far as i understood this function really checks the polygons
> around the poi to check if the poi-coordinates are located
> within the polygon specified.
> It can not check variables because they don't have an outline.
>
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>
> Joris Bo
> jori...@hotmail.com
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: mkgmap-dev > Namens
> jan meisters
> Verzonden: dinsdag 16 februari 2021 14:12
> Aan: Development list for mkgmap <
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk >
> Onderwerp: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I try to use is_in to fetch pois inside own invented tags,
> e.g.:
>
>
Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
Hi Jan
I'm slightly confused as to what you are trying to do here when you say
it works for nodes but not polygons.
After you've output a POI from the first rule what are you trying to
do?
Ticker
On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 10:42 +0100, jan meisters wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
>
> my first impression didn´t get trough further test.
>
> This works for nodes, but not for polygons:
> leisure=stadium & sport=swimming [0x2d09 resolution 24]
> sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
> is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
>
> It matches it´s own swimming tag as well, not only when stadium is
> given.
> Tried various spellings/brackets, but I can´t get it to work for
> stadium and swimming as a combination only.
> I guess we don´t have a syntax for this?
>
> Attached a small example.
>
> Jan
>
>
> > Am 16.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb jan meisters :
> >
> > Hi Gerd,
> >
> > so easy - that works!
> > Thanks for helping me out
> > Jan
> >
> > > Am 16.02.2021 um 17:44 schrieb Gerd Petermann <
> > > gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Hi Jan,
> > >
> > > is_in(leisure,park,...) & is_in(sport,swimming,...)
> > > should work.
> > >
> > > Gerd
> > >
> > >
> > > Von: mkgmap-dev im
> > > Auftrag von jan meisters
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 17:31
> > > An: Development list for mkgmap
> > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
> > >
> > > Hi Joris,
> > >
> > > thanks for stating - I guessed something like that.
> > >
> > > What I want is to is_in for a tag-combination, e.g. leisure=park
> > > & sport=swimming.
> > > I have a poi-rule for park first and further want to
> > > exclude swimmings inside matching polygons.
> > >
> > > Do I have another option to define the combination so that it can
> > > be seen by is_in?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > Am 16.02.2021 um 14:48 schrieb Joris Bo :
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jan
> > > >
> > > > As far as i understood this function really checks the polygons
> > > > around the poi to check if the poi-coordinates are located
> > > > within the polygon specified.
> > > > It can not check variables because they don't have an outline.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Met vriendelijke groeten,
> > > >
> > > > Joris Bo
> > > > jori...@hotmail.com
> > > >
> > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> > > > Van: mkgmap-dev Namens
> > > > jan meisters
> > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 16 februari 2021 14:12
> > > > Aan: Development list for mkgmap <
> > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
> > > > Onderwerp: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I try to use is_in to fetch pois inside own invented tags,
> > > > e.g.:
> > > >
> > > > leisure=park {add processed=yes} [0x2c06 resolution 24
> > > > continue with_actions]
> > > > leisure=swimming_pool & is_in(processed,yes,in_or_on)=true
> > > > {delete leisure}
> > > >
> > > > This fails, however „is_in(leisure,park,in_or_on)=true“ works
> > > > in the example.
> > > > Could someone explain where I´m wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Jan
> > > > ___
> > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > ___
> > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > >
> > > ___
> > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > ___
> > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> >
> > ___
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
Hi Gerd,
my first impression didn´t get trough further test.
This works for nodes, but not for polygons:
leisure=stadium & sport=swimming [0x2d09 resolution 24]
sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
It matches it´s own swimming tag as well, not only when stadium is given.
Tried various spellings/brackets, but I can´t get it to work for stadium and
swimming as a combination only.
I guess we don´t have a syntax for this?
Attached a small example.
Jan
swim.osm
Description: application/osm
> Am 16.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb jan meisters :
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> so easy - that works!
> Thanks for helping me out
> Jan
>
>> Am 16.02.2021 um 17:44 schrieb Gerd Petermann
>> :
>>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> is_in(leisure,park,...) & is_in(sport,swimming,...)
>> should work.
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>>
>> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von jan
>> meisters
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 17:31
>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
>>
>> Hi Joris,
>>
>> thanks for stating - I guessed something like that.
>>
>> What I want is to is_in for a tag-combination, e.g. leisure=park &
>> sport=swimming.
>> I have a poi-rule for park first and further want to exclude
>> swimmings inside matching polygons.
>>
>> Do I have another option to define the combination so that it can be seen by
>> is_in?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jan
>>
>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 14:48 schrieb Joris Bo :
>>>
>>> Hi Jan
>>>
>>> As far as i understood this function really checks the polygons around the
>>> poi to check if the poi-coordinates are located within the polygon
>>> specified.
>>> It can not check variables because they don't have an outline.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>>>
>>> Joris Bo
>>> jori...@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>>> Van: mkgmap-dev Namens jan meisters
>>> Verzonden: dinsdag 16 februari 2021 14:12
>>> Aan: Development list for mkgmap
>>> Onderwerp: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I try to use is_in to fetch pois inside own invented tags, e.g.:
>>>
>>> leisure=park {add processed=yes} [0x2c06 resolution 24 continue
>>> with_actions]
>>> leisure=swimming_pool & is_in(processed,yes,in_or_on)=true {delete
>>> leisure}
>>>
>>> This fails, however „is_in(leisure,park,in_or_on)=true“ works in the
>>> example.
>>> Could someone explain where I´m wrong?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jan
>>> ___
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> ___
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>> ___
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> ___
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
