[mkgmap-dev] administrative boundaries for Slovakia
Hello,
could you, please include following into the inc/address file of the
default style.
For Slovakia I am almost sure it is correct and for Greece I have high
level of belief.
Thanks
Marek
# Slovakia
mkgmap:country=SVK mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level6=* { set
mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level6}' }
mkgmap:country=SVK mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level9=* { set
mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level9}' }
mkgmap:country=SVK mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level8=* { set
mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level8}' }
# Greece
mkgmap:country=GRE mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level7=* { set
mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level7}' }
mkgmap:country=GRE mkgmap:city!=* mkgmap:admin_level8=* { set
mkgmap:city='${mkgmap:admin_level8}' }
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] administrative boundaries for Slovakia
On 19/07/14 15:22, Marek Greško wrote: could you, please include following into the inc/address file of the default style. Done, thanks! ..Steve ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries
Is it possible that someone moves the low level administrative boundaries to a higher zoomlevel in the default stylesheet? I know, I should submit a patch myself... Lambertus wrote: It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404 What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404 What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries
May I also add, most admin_level boundaries around my area use relations. How do I use a relation style to show admin level boundaries i.e. (or something similar) admin_level = 6-8 resolution 15 admin_level= 10-15 resolution 2o On 8/3/09, Lambertus o...@na1400.info wrote: It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404 What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries
--- Lun 3/8/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com ha scritto: Da: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries A: Development list for mkgmap mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Data: Lunedì 3 agosto 2009, 10:44 May I also add, most admin_level boundaries around my area use relations. How do I use a relation style to show admin level boundaries i.e. (or something similar) admin_level = 6-8 resolution 15 admin_level= 10-15 resolution 2o Hi, I use this in my style: #boundaries boundary=administrative admin_level3 [0x1e resolution 14] boundary=administrative admin_level5 [0x1d resolution 16] boundary=administrative admin_level7 [0x1d resolution 20] boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22] boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14] It looks nice for Italy. Ciao, Marco. On 8/3/09, Lambertus o...@na1400.info wrote: It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404 What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries? ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries
Thanks! will try this tonight
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Apollinaris Schoellascho...@gmail.com wrote:
don't see a reason why it shouldn't work for a relation
for a relation you will need an entry in the relations file to copy tags to
the lines and then process the rules for the lines
an example I have been playing with for highways. a new tag route_ref is
defined from the relation and applied to the line. in the line style you can
use the usual syntax to use this tag.
you can also use the usual tags. I just kept it on a special tag name to
have the ref from the way and from the relation in different tags for
flexible use
# style/relations
type=route route=road { apply {
add route_ref='${network} ${ref} ${direction}';
add route_ref='${network} ${ref}';
}}
# style/lines
highway=* {name '${route_name}' | '${route_ref} ${name}' | '${ref} ${name}'
| '$
{name}'| '${ref}' }
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:30 PM, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Marco,
Does this work as a relation?
#boundaries
boundary=administrative admin_level3 [0x1e resolution 14]
boundary=administrative admin_level5 [0x1d resolution 16]
boundary=administrative admin_level7 [0x1d resolution 20]
boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22]
boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22]
boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14]
It looks nice for Italy.
Ciao, Marco.
On 8/3/09, Lambertus o...@na1400.info
wrote:
It appears that very low level administrative
boundaries are rendered
quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An
example is shown
here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404
What are the options to reduce the visibility of those
boundaries?
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
