Re: [mkgmap-dev] Making site relations visible
Hi Dave, it is not possible now, but I think the needed calculation is not very complicated. We'd need a tag like mkgmap:calcPolygon=1 to tell mkgmap that it should add a way containing the tags of the relation and the points of the convex hull. I'm busy with the housenumbers2 branch now, maybe someone can code this? Gerd Dave Swarthout wrote > Yes, ideally I'd like to show the contents of the name tag (for example, > name=Nice Apartments), in the center of the space occupied by the three > (or > more) objects that make up the site. > > Is this possible? > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:08 PM, GerdP < > gpetermann_muenchen@ > > > wrote: > >> Hi Dave, >> >> the relations file allows to add tags from the relations to the members. >> I guess you want to do something else, maybe calculate a polygon >> that encloses all members ? >> >> Gerd >> >> >> Dave Swarthout wrote >> > Can someone give me information about rendering relations. I have >> tagged >> > some relations of type=site but they don't show up in my maps. One such >> > site is a named group of three apartment buildings. The relation itself >> > has >> > a name tag and each building is merely tagged as building=yes. I've had >> > trouble with relations before and although they are the correct way to >> tag >> > certain groups of objects the fact that they seem not to render >> properly >> > exasperates me. >> > >> > Unfortunately, the relations style file that I am using deals only with >> > routes. >> > >> > This is not really a development question but you're the experts. If >> you >> > think this question should be asked elsewhere, please make a >> suggestion. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Dave >> > >> > ___ >> > mkgmap-dev mailing list >> >> > mkgmap-dev@.org >> >> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Making-site-relations-visible-tp5834634p5834638.html >> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> ___ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > mkgmap-dev@.org >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> > > > > -- > Dave Swarthout > Homer, Alaska > Chiang Mai, Thailand > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > > ___ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@.org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Making-site-relations-visible-tp5834634p5834644.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Making site relations visible
Yes, ideally I'd like to show the contents of the name tag (for example, name=Nice Apartments), in the center of the space occupied by the three (or more) objects that make up the site. Is this possible? On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:08 PM, GerdP wrote: > Hi Dave, > > the relations file allows to add tags from the relations to the members. > I guess you want to do something else, maybe calculate a polygon > that encloses all members ? > > Gerd > > > Dave Swarthout wrote > > Can someone give me information about rendering relations. I have tagged > > some relations of type=site but they don't show up in my maps. One such > > site is a named group of three apartment buildings. The relation itself > > has > > a name tag and each building is merely tagged as building=yes. I've had > > trouble with relations before and although they are the correct way to > tag > > certain groups of objects the fact that they seem not to render properly > > exasperates me. > > > > Unfortunately, the relations style file that I am using deals only with > > routes. > > > > This is not really a development question but you're the experts. If you > > think this question should be asked elsewhere, please make a suggestion. > > > > Cheers, > > Dave > > > > ___ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > > mkgmap-dev@.org > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Making-site-relations-visible-tp5834634p5834638.html > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ___ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Making site relations visible
Hi Dave, the relations file allows to add tags from the relations to the members. I guess you want to do something else, maybe calculate a polygon that encloses all members ? Gerd Dave Swarthout wrote > Can someone give me information about rendering relations. I have tagged > some relations of type=site but they don't show up in my maps. One such > site is a named group of three apartment buildings. The relation itself > has > a name tag and each building is merely tagged as building=yes. I've had > trouble with relations before and although they are the correct way to tag > certain groups of objects the fact that they seem not to render properly > exasperates me. > > Unfortunately, the relations style file that I am using deals only with > routes. > > This is not really a development question but you're the experts. If you > think this question should be asked elsewhere, please make a suggestion. > > Cheers, > Dave > > ___ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@.org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Making-site-relations-visible-tp5834634p5834638.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] Making site relations visible
Can someone give me information about rendering relations. I have tagged some relations of type=site but they don't show up in my maps. One such site is a named group of three apartment buildings. The relation itself has a name tag and each building is merely tagged as building=yes. I've had trouble with relations before and although they are the correct way to tag certain groups of objects the fact that they seem not to render properly exasperates me. Unfortunately, the relations style file that I am using deals only with routes. This is not really a development question but you're the experts. If you think this question should be asked elsewhere, please make a suggestion. Cheers, Dave ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
