Re: [mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

[UliBaer]

Hi,

i have comparable performance to former Java 8 and considerable lower memory
consumption,
when i use the OpenJDK 10 with the Eclipse OpenJ9 VM from AdoptOpenJDK!

It is not officially released jet, but i use it with great success.
If you want to try, you'll have to use the nightly builds from AdoptOpenJDK:
https://adoptopenjdk.net/nightly.html?variant=openjdk10-openj9

Best regards and happy trying, Uli ;)



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

[Gerd Petermann]

Hi Felix,

I am not sure but I think a JRE 8 will not execute a jar file compiled with JDK 
9 or higher.
So, I was only talking about using a newer JRE. I don't know when we will start 
to compile with 9 or higher.
If I got that right JDK 9 is no longer available, so we probably have to switch 
to 10 or higher.

Gerd


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Felix 
Hartmann <extremecar...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2018 16:05:50
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

Hi Gerd,
What about if you compile mkgmap with java 9 or higher - and run it on Java 8 - 
this also applies or not? Or asked differently - is this dependant on the 
compilation system or on the executing system?


Felix

On 16 May 2018 at 15:53, Gerd Petermann 
<gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

it seems that the new Garbage Collector (G1GC) that was introduced with Java 
JRE 9 causes longer run times for splitter and mkgmap.
I've played with some options and found that the use of -XX:+AggressiveHeap 
seems to be a good idea when you use these newer JREs.

Without this option the java programs tend to allocate more memory and thus the 
OS might start to swap.

Gerd

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev



--
Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org
Schusterbergweg 32/8
6020 Innsbruck
Austria - Österreich
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

[Felix Hartmann]

Hi Gerd,
What about if you compile mkgmap with java 9 or higher - and run it on Java
8 - this also applies or not? Or asked differently - is this dependant on
the compilation system or on the executing system?


Felix

On 16 May 2018 at 15:53, Gerd Petermann 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> it seems that the new Garbage Collector (G1GC) that was introduced with
> Java JRE 9 causes longer run times for splitter and mkgmap.
> I've played with some options and found that the use of
> -XX:+AggressiveHeap seems to be a good idea when you use these newer JREs.
>
> Without this option the java programs tend to allocate more memory and
> thus the OS might start to swap.
>
> Gerd
>
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>



-- 
Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org
Schusterbergweg 32/8
6020 Innsbruck
Austria - Österreich
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

[mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

[Gerd Petermann]

Hi all,

it seems that the new Garbage Collector (G1GC) that was introduced with Java 
JRE 9 causes longer run times for splitter and mkgmap.
I've played with some options and found that the use of -XX:+AggressiveHeap 
seems to be a good idea when you use these newer JREs.

Without this option the java programs tend to allocate more memory and thus the 
OS might start to swap.

Gerd

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev