Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-18 Thread WanMil
 On 12/10/13 15:07, WanMil wrote:
 I have tried a map with Garmin style (1st=shieldref 2nd=name). This
 has the disadvantage that the ref is displayed on the map but not used
 in the routing instructions. Only the street name is given as routing
 instruction (tested on Oregon 400 and Nüvi 1490).

 Sure, but that would be how official Garmin maps work too, unless we are
 missing a trick.

 Anyway, it seems reasonable to keep 2nd='name (ref)'; I just wanted to
 present the opposite extreme.

It's quite interesting, how Garmin maps look like.
In the end anybody can implement an own style, so it's just a minor 
discussion how to set the name in the default style.

I observed that there are more shield characters apart from the ref 
symbols. Do you know their functions? GPSMapEdit tells me that they hide 
some parts. Maybe they are useful for our purpose?

WanMil


 Cheers,
 ..Steve

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-18 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
On 18/10/13 20:41, WanMil wrote:
 I observed that there are more shield characters apart from the ref
 symbols. Do you know their functions? GPSMapEdit tells me that they hide
 some parts. Maybe they are useful for our purpose?

There are characters that can be used to separate parts of a name so 
that the following or preceding parts of the name are hidden at 
particular zooms to save space.

Eg. N[0x1e]Green[0x1f]Street

would display N Green Street or just Green. Then there are non-spacing 
versions and characters for force upper or lower case of the following 
character.

..Steve

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-17 Thread Andrzej Popowski
Hi,

we talk about 4 labels, but shouldn't we set whole address for each label?

Cgpsmapper accept 3 labels but for 2 of them you can set different city, 
region or country. This is usable, because quite often there are streets 
at 2 cities border, which not only have 2 names, but belong to 2 
different regions.

I'm not sure how OSM deals with multiple names, but you could at least 
add support for mp format and prepare tools in style.

BTW, do you know, that cgpsmapper source is for sell?
http://cgpsmapper.com/buy.htm

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-17 Thread Felix Hartmann

On 17.10.2013 12:33, Andrzej Popowski wrote:

 BTW, do you know, that cgpsmapper source is for sell?
 http://cgpsmapper.com/buy.htm

Is there still a need for it? Conditions state: you can buy all the 
source code, with no limit for use.
so that includes open publication?

If there is a need, I would be willing to pay 300€ in a shared buy (just 
need to get some receipt saying that I paid 300€ in part to buy the 
source code and that the amount includes VAT).

-- 
keep on biking and discovering new trails

Felix
openmtbmap.org  www.velomap.org


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-17 Thread Andrzej Popowski
Hi Felix,

off-topic, but interesting ;)

  Is there still a need for it?

There are some features in cgpsmapper, still not available in mkgmap, 
but I think nothing really important. The main advantage of cgpsmapper 
is stability, this is commercial grade compiler.

  Conditions state: you can buy all the
  source code, with no limit for use.
  so that includes open publication?

I was thinking about it too.

What I wouldn't like is to publish code dealing with locking maps. While 
it is not difficult to revers engineer it, direct available source code 
would be quite problematic for publishers, which still use cgpsmapper 
for commercial products. This would include some of my work too.

  If there is a need, I would be willing to pay 300€ in a shared buy

I'm considering participation too, if there would be a reasonable way of 
shared buy.

But I'm not sure if this code has a future. Mkgmap seems to have great 
support and potential for future development, could cgpsmapper compete 
there?

Still would be nice to release current version of full featured 
cgpsmapper for free.

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-17 Thread Felix Hartmann
I didn't think about cgpsmapper as a program. To me at least it has no 
interest. My thinking was, I will participate if it helps improving 
mkgmap, or debugging mkgmap, and maybe improve autorouting?
Also I think it only makes sense to buy, if the source code afterwards 
really can be openly published (maybe take out the locking part, even 
though I think that part is already pretty much floaring around the net, 
I can remember that cgpsmapper locking mechanism and how it works was 
already published in some places some time ago).

I don't think there is any use for cpgsmapper as a compiler anymore 
(except maybe compare output of mkgmap and cgpsmapper for the same input 
material).
On 17.10.2013 13:57, Andrzej Popowski wrote:
 Hi Felix,

 off-topic, but interesting ;)

Is there still a need for it?

 There are some features in cgpsmapper, still not available in mkgmap,
 but I think nothing really important. The main advantage of cgpsmapper
 is stability, this is commercial grade compiler.

Conditions state: you can buy all the
source code, with no limit for use.
so that includes open publication?

 I was thinking about it too.

 What I wouldn't like is to publish code dealing with locking maps. While
 it is not difficult to revers engineer it, direct available source code
 would be quite problematic for publishers, which still use cgpsmapper
 for commercial products. This would include some of my work too.

If there is a need, I would be willing to pay 300€ in a shared buy

 I'm considering participation too, if there would be a reasonable way of
 shared buy.

 But I'm not sure if this code has a future. Mkgmap seems to have great
 support and potential for future development, could cgpsmapper compete
 there?

 Still would be nice to release current version of full featured
 cgpsmapper for free.


-- 
keep on biking and discovering new trails

Felix
openmtbmap.org  www.velomap.org


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-16 Thread Felix Hartmann
Could we have an external file that defines how the labels are read in?

I would like to have name, mgkmap:name=1, mkgmap:name2, mkgamp:name=3
to be used. However just having mkgmap:name1 to 4 is also okay (would 
mean the first line of my style is name=* {set mkgmap:name='${name}'}

then replace all calls to name by calling mkgmap:name in the style 
subsequently. Which does make some lines longer. Same would be true for 
ref if you need it. If there is a separate file where you can define 
what is by default read in as the first fields, it would save some space 
and lines.


Otherwise just go for mkgmap:name1 to 4 as not being able to define what 
ends up where, would be rather confusing. So definitely not already hard 
define name:1 with ref, and name:2 with name, as some people may prefer 
maps without using ref. I will have to do some testing, but I think I 
rather not need ref at all. (I much prefer if the search alternatively 
can find route name, street name each on it's own, and alternatively 
street name (route name).


Felix
(clearly the current way is not good, I don't know at all the outcome of 
setting, ref, name, whatever).
On 13.10.2013 00:30, Henning Scholland wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi,

 I think it's better to have only something like:

 mkgmap:name:1
 mkgmap:name:2
 mkgmap:name:3
 mkgmap:name:4

 If [..] is processed the string of mkgmap:name:1..4 is written to the
 file. If one tag is empty the next one in order is used. If
 mkgmap:name:4 is processed, all other fields stays empty.

 I don't know if it's useful to have an automatism for name-tag because
 this is again a hard coded thing, which we would like to omit.

 Maybe an additional style-function addname string is an useful
 thing. This function would add the string to the first empty
 mkgmap:name:1..4. If all 4 are not empty nothing will be added.

 Henning
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32)

 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSWc2OAAoJEPFgsWC7jOeTYYcH/jt+/KlT7zjYGyqHub2TO9We
 6C3s2VcGMbU3Es8yocJFaUUhCEgKyVh3QUaqvLDHHOSCzD/O4+KtaYMXoNSZsKwX
 /QdkFOXOyWx32zqRPbohfFqghakM169w41v/jpuy/os/dMl36X1PAfPFpp/Hcv6L
 rddkUEJ3zuSqCxo5k7XZYS2miJ77V/j6fDFTuyJpNnhQdE6c3JOdfctYtuiEGc8q
 3eV/xjw1oojJg6Yb2nvmernx8m5q02yZMIcaPia/ATIv2q+61b3244z1aZbDLSHE
 dTs59PgHym5FqGfP0ElEmIUeduP7UFByyqlrRmLYRBnP+6oTOPl+LJwMs58bPUE=
 =Q9BX
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 mkgmap-dev mailing list
 mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
 http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-- 
keep on biking and discovering new trails

Felix
openmtbmap.org  www.velomap.org

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-12 Thread Henning Scholland
Am 12.10.2013 00:00, schrieb Steve Ratcliffe:
 1st: shieldL276
 2nd: Laacher Straße 
 
 The third and fourth positions would be for alternate names.


So we would need something like:

mkgmap:ref- 1st
mkgmap:name   - 2nd
mkgmap:name_1 - 3rd
mkgmap:name_2 - 4th

Everything else should be done in style-file. What about the case if one
tag is missing? Eg. mkgmap:ref = empty. Should then the 1st one stay
empty as well or should this field filled with mkgmap:name?

If there are no issues with Garmin, I would prefer let the missing ones
stay empty. So it's quite clear and constant which tag is associated
with which field.

Henning

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-12 Thread Andrzej Popowski
Hi,

I think only first label is visible on map and used for driving 
instructions. The only manifestations of other labels that I have 
noticed is in address search. These are my experiences form cgpsmapper, 
but I assume that street labels in mkgmap are the same.

In my opinion first label should be set to name, others should be 
available to use in style but empty by default.

I have found that the sequence shieldref name looks bad in many 
devices and I prefer to avoid it. I set first label to street name and 
second to reference number, if both value are present. This way I can 
see street names in a city. I use other labels for alternative names.

I'd like ref to be searchable, I understand that only shield mark is 
removed and reference number is used for indexing.

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-12 Thread WanMil
 I do not see the need to repeat the name and the ref so many times.
 Having the ref in brackets after the name comes from the time before we had 
 NET and more than one possible name. Perhaps the other entries were useful 
 before we had the real index as well.

I have tried a map with Garmin style (1st=shieldref 2nd=name). This 
has the disadvantage that the ref is displayed on the map but not used 
in the routing instructions. Only the street name is given as routing 
instruction (tested on Oregon 400 and Nüvi 1490).

WanMil
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-12 Thread Steve Ratcliffe
On 12/10/13 08:05, Henning Scholland wrote:
 tag is missing? Eg. mkgmap:ref = empty. Should then the 1st one stay
 empty as well or should this field filled with mkgmap:name?

Yes if there is no ref then the plain name would be the first entry
in the map file and any other entries would be moved up.

 If there are no issues with Garmin, I would prefer let the missing ones
 stay empty. So it's quite clear and constant which tag is associated
 with which field.

Yes, it would probably be best to have the mkgmap entries empty,
rather than loads of logic to shuffle them around.  I think however
that empty ones would have to be dropped when written to the file.

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-12 Thread WanMil
 On 12/10/13 08:05, Henning Scholland wrote:
 tag is missing? Eg. mkgmap:ref = empty. Should then the 1st one stay
 empty as well or should this field filled with mkgmap:name?

 Yes if there is no ref then the plain name would be the first entry
 in the map file and any other entries would be moved up.

 If there are no issues with Garmin, I would prefer let the missing ones
 stay empty. So it's quite clear and constant which tag is associated
 with which field.

 Yes, it would probably be best to have the mkgmap entries empty,
 rather than loads of logic to shuffle them around.  I think however
 that empty ones would have to be dropped when written to the file.

 ..Steve

So the order to set the labels might be:
mkgmap:ref
mkgmap:name
mkgmap:name:1
mkgmap:name:2
mkgmap:name:3
...

The first four of the tags that are set are used.

I think the following behaviour makes sense:
If mkgmap:name is not set then the name tag is used?
The name action adds the mkgmap:name tag instead of settings the name in 
the java element?

I wonder if it is easier for style devs to set one mkgmap:addname 
separated with ; instead of setting mkgmap:name:1..n?

WanMil

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-12 Thread Henning Scholland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I think it's better to have only something like:

mkgmap:name:1
mkgmap:name:2
mkgmap:name:3
mkgmap:name:4

If [..] is processed the string of mkgmap:name:1..4 is written to the
file. If one tag is empty the next one in order is used. If
mkgmap:name:4 is processed, all other fields stays empty.

I don't know if it's useful to have an automatism for name-tag because
this is again a hard coded thing, which we would like to omit.

Maybe an additional style-function addname string is an useful
thing. This function would add the string to the first empty
mkgmap:name:1..4. If all 4 are not empty nothing will be added.

Henning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSWc2OAAoJEPFgsWC7jOeTYYcH/jt+/KlT7zjYGyqHub2TO9We
6C3s2VcGMbU3Es8yocJFaUUhCEgKyVh3QUaqvLDHHOSCzD/O4+KtaYMXoNSZsKwX
/QdkFOXOyWx32zqRPbohfFqghakM169w41v/jpuy/os/dMl36X1PAfPFpp/Hcv6L
rddkUEJ3zuSqCxo5k7XZYS2miJ77V/j6fDFTuyJpNnhQdE6c3JOdfctYtuiEGc8q
3eV/xjw1oojJg6Yb2nvmernx8m5q02yZMIcaPia/ATIv2q+61b3244z1aZbDLSHE
dTs59PgHym5FqGfP0ElEmIUeduP7UFByyqlrRmLYRBnP+6oTOPl+LJwMs58bPUE=
=Q9BX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] mergeroads branch - how to set street labels in style files

2013-10-11 Thread Steve Ratcliffe


 Hi WanMil


Street search indexes all four labels. So a street with the following 
labels:
1st: shieldL276 Laacher Straße
2nd: Laacher Straße (L276)
3rd: L276

In a Garmin map this would be just

1st: shieldL276
2nd: Laacher Straße 

The third and fourth positions would be for alternate names.

I do not see the need to repeat the name and the ref so many times.
Having the ref in brackets after the name comes from the time before we had NET 
and more than one possible name. Perhaps the other entries were useful before 
we had the real index as well.

With the index both the name and the ref are searchable with just those two 
name entries.

..Steve


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev