Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

2018-02-07 Thread Thomas Morgenstern 
Thank you :-).  Yesterday I had send a message to the Author Javier Sanchez 
.

thomas

--
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Datum: Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2018 06:24
An: "Development list for mkgmap" <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations


Hi Thomas,

I've just fixed the relation [1], so please try again with a fresh 
download tomorrow.


Gerd
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56139020


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von 
Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>

Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 14:47
An: Thomas Morgenstern; Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Thomas,

the relation is broken. Use JOSM validator and it will report 2 errors.
I think this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556302821
should not belong to it and a few nodes should be merged to repiar it:
node 4298102908
node 4298102907
node 655141348

Gerd


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von 
Thomas Morgenstern <webmas...@img2ms.de>

Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 14:35
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Gerd, i have now made a different split, so that 1 tile contains the
whole isle. In this case it looks good. I assume, that the relation is 
okay.
No idea what should be changed in data. Also i have looked before with 
JOSM

in the old split and  confirm, that in the left tile the relation also
exists, but not rendered from mkgmap. I can't judge, if the relation is
broken or not. Therefore the problem is in mkgmap ? I
thomas

--
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:15
An: "Thomas Morgenstern" <webmas...@img2ms.de>; "Development list for
mkgmap" <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations


Hi Thomas,

I think the problem is that the relation is broken. Splitter writes it to
both tiles, but
mkgmap seems to have problems with it.
Anyway, the problem is in the data and should be fixed in OSM.

Gerd



Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von
Thomas Morgenstern <webmas...@img2ms.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:50
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Gerd, i found out, that splitter r590 can not proper handle the
relation
2.691.138. I can reproduce the problem. It makes no different, if I 
splitt

the canary-islands-latest.osm.pbf with the default-option or with my own
splitt.list. If I move the tileborder by changing the nord-south border,
also the problem is moved. See picture at
http://img2ms.de/OSM/ErrorInSplitter-r590.jpg. At the tile-boundary
splitter
creates only for the rightsite tile the polygon for  tag
boundary=protected_area , respektive leisure=nature_reserve. In the
leftsite-tile this tags are missing.
maybee you can have a look at that ?

regards thomas



___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

2018-02-06 Thread Gerd Petermann 
Hi Thomas,

I've just fixed the relation [1], so please try again with a fresh download 
tomorrow.

Gerd
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56139020


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd 
Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 14:47
An: Thomas Morgenstern; Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Thomas,

the relation is broken. Use JOSM validator and it will report 2 errors.
I think this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556302821
should not belong to it and a few nodes should be merged to repiar it:
node 4298102908
node 4298102907
node 655141348

Gerd


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Thomas 
Morgenstern <webmas...@img2ms.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 14:35
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Gerd, i have now made a different split, so that 1 tile contains the
whole isle. In this case it looks good. I assume, that the relation is okay.
No idea what should be changed in data. Also i have looked before with JOSM
in the old split and  confirm, that in the left tile the relation also
exists, but not rendered from mkgmap. I can't judge, if the relation is
broken or not. Therefore the problem is in mkgmap ? I
thomas

--
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:15
An: "Thomas Morgenstern" <webmas...@img2ms.de>; "Development list for
mkgmap" <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

> Hi Thomas,
>
> I think the problem is that the relation is broken. Splitter writes it to
> both tiles, but
> mkgmap seems to have problems with it.
> Anyway, the problem is in the data and should be fixed in OSM.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> 
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von
> Thomas Morgenstern <webmas...@img2ms.de>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:50
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
>
> Hi Gerd, i found out, that splitter r590 can not proper handle the
> relation
> 2.691.138. I can reproduce the problem. It makes no different, if I splitt
> the canary-islands-latest.osm.pbf with the default-option or with my own
> splitt.list. If I move the tileborder by changing the nord-south border,
> also the problem is moved. See picture at
> http://img2ms.de/OSM/ErrorInSplitter-r590.jpg. At the tile-boundary
> splitter
> creates only for the rightsite tile the polygon for  tag
> boundary=protected_area , respektive leisure=nature_reserve. In the
> leftsite-tile this tags are missing.
> maybee you can have a look at that ?
>
> regards thomas
>
>
>
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

2018-02-06 Thread Gerd Petermann 
Hi Thomas,

the relation is broken. Use JOSM validator and it will report 2 errors.
I think this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556302821
should not belong to it and a few nodes should be merged to repiar it:
node 4298102908
node 4298102907
node 655141348

Gerd


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Thomas 
Morgenstern <webmas...@img2ms.de>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 14:35
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Gerd, i have now made a different split, so that 1 tile contains the
whole isle. In this case it looks good. I assume, that the relation is okay.
No idea what should be changed in data. Also i have looked before with JOSM
in the old split and  confirm, that in the left tile the relation also
exists, but not rendered from mkgmap. I can't judge, if the relation is
broken or not. Therefore the problem is in mkgmap ? I
thomas

--
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:15
An: "Thomas Morgenstern" <webmas...@img2ms.de>; "Development list for
mkgmap" <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

> Hi Thomas,
>
> I think the problem is that the relation is broken. Splitter writes it to
> both tiles, but
> mkgmap seems to have problems with it.
> Anyway, the problem is in the data and should be fixed in OSM.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> 
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von
> Thomas Morgenstern <webmas...@img2ms.de>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:50
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
>
> Hi Gerd, i found out, that splitter r590 can not proper handle the
> relation
> 2.691.138. I can reproduce the problem. It makes no different, if I splitt
> the canary-islands-latest.osm.pbf with the default-option or with my own
> splitt.list. If I move the tileborder by changing the nord-south border,
> also the problem is moved. See picture at
> http://img2ms.de/OSM/ErrorInSplitter-r590.jpg. At the tile-boundary
> splitter
> creates only for the rightsite tile the polygon for  tag
> boundary=protected_area , respektive leisure=nature_reserve. In the
> leftsite-tile this tags are missing.
> maybee you can have a look at that ?
>
> regards thomas
>
>
>
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

2018-02-06 Thread Thomas Morgenstern 
Hi Gerd, i have now made a different split, so that 1 tile contains the 
whole isle. In this case it looks good. I assume, that the relation is okay. 
No idea what should be changed in data. Also i have looked before with JOSM 
in the old split and  confirm, that in the left tile the relation also 
exists, but not rendered from mkgmap. I can't judge, if the relation is 
broken or not. Therefore the problem is in mkgmap ? I

thomas

--
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:15
An: "Thomas Morgenstern" <webmas...@img2ms.de>; "Development list for 
mkgmap" <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>

Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations


Hi Thomas,

I think the problem is that the relation is broken. Splitter writes it to 
both tiles, but

mkgmap seems to have problems with it.
Anyway, the problem is in the data and should be fixed in OSM.

Gerd



Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von 
Thomas Morgenstern <webmas...@img2ms.de>

Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:50
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Gerd, i found out, that splitter r590 can not proper handle the 
relation

2.691.138. I can reproduce the problem. It makes no different, if I splitt
the canary-islands-latest.osm.pbf with the default-option or with my own
splitt.list. If I move the tileborder by changing the nord-south border,
also the problem is moved. See picture at
http://img2ms.de/OSM/ErrorInSplitter-r590.jpg. At the tile-boundary 
splitter

creates only for the rightsite tile the polygon for  tag
boundary=protected_area , respektive leisure=nature_reserve. In the
leftsite-tile this tags are missing.
maybee you can have a look at that ?

regards thomas



___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

2018-02-06 Thread Gerd Petermann 
Hi Thomas,

I think the problem is that the relation is broken. Splitter writes it to both 
tiles, but
mkgmap seems to have problems with it.
Anyway, the problem is in the data and should be fixed in OSM.

Gerd



Von: mkgmap-dev  im Auftrag von Thomas 
Morgenstern 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:50
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations

Hi Gerd, i found out, that splitter r590 can not proper handle the relation
2.691.138. I can reproduce the problem. It makes no different, if I splitt
the canary-islands-latest.osm.pbf with the default-option or with my own
splitt.list. If I move the tileborder by changing the nord-south border,
also the problem is moved. See picture at
http://img2ms.de/OSM/ErrorInSplitter-r590.jpg. At the tile-boundary splitter
creates only for the rightsite tile the polygon for  tag
boundary=protected_area , respektive leisure=nature_reserve. In the
leftsite-tile this tags are missing.
maybee you can have a look at that ?

regards thomas



___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev