[mochikit] Re: packing mochikit
Tim Stebbing escreveu: > Just after some thoughts about more compact mochikit.js building. I > had a vague idea that if we could write a script that would generate a > dependency graph for all functions > in mochikit, then you could specify the functions your application > uses, and generate a packed mochikit.js with only the modules and > functions + dependencies your application requires.. about as small as > you could possibly get. > > thoughts? > > be my guest --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[mochikit] Re: packing mochikit
On 1-Aug-06, at 5:41 PM, Tim Stebbing wrote: > Just after some thoughts about more compact mochikit.js building. I > had a vague idea that if we could write a script that would generate a > dependency graph for all functions > in mochikit, then you could specify the functions your application > uses, and generate a packed mochikit.js with only the modules and > functions + dependencies your application requires.. about as small as > you could possibly get. > > thoughts? Dojo is working on something like this. They've got a JavaScript linker in the works via "Google's Summer of Code": http://blog.dojotoolkit.org/2006/07/22/summer-of-code If you'd like to help out, try getting in touch with Satish. I'm looking forward to the results of this work. Beau --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[mochikit] Re: packing mochikit
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Tim Stebbing wrote: > Just after some thoughts about more compact mochikit.js building. I > had a vague idea that if we could write a script that would generate a > dependency graph for all functions > in mochikit, then you could specify the functions your application > uses, and generate a packed mochikit.js with only the modules and > functions + dependencies your application requires.. about as small as > you could possibly get. > > thoughts? Like a lot of things, it'd be nice if that existed, and I'd probably even use it... but to my knowledge, such a tool doesn't exist (at least in the open source world). Such an undertaking doesn't belong in MochiKit, but it certainly would be highly appreciated by the JS-using community in general. It'd certainly be non-trivial to write such a thing, unless it relied heavily on hints from the user and in the libraries. -bob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
