RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails

2000-09-26 Thread Jeff Warner

If you are using qmail-inject in a high volume configuration, make sure you
reduce or eliminate most of its logging, otherwise the system will spin its
wheels doing logging work and not sending out emails.

Haven't compared Net::SMTP to qmail-inject, but qmail-inject is
significantly faster than straight sendmail on Linux.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 5:21 PM
To: Stas Bekman
Cc: Bill Moseley; Modperl
Subject: Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails


On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:

> All you care about is to measure the time between email sending start and
> end (when the process continues on its execution flow). Why should one
> care about the details of internal implementation.

i only skimmed the first part of this thread, but assumed if you're
talking about performance, you'd want to compare the overall impact on
your system(s) of Net::SMTP vs. |qmail-inject.  you cannot measure the
overall impact just using Benchmark.pm is all i'm trying to clarify.





Building mod_perl and mod_jserv into same apache

2000-08-21 Thread Jeff Warner

We need to have mod_perl and mod_jserv in the same httpd file.  I can build
apache 1.3.9 for either mod_perl or mod_jserv using the appropriate make
commands from the install docs and they work fine.

I've tried to build a mod_perl httpd and then use
./configure \
--prefix=/usr/local/apache \
--activate-module=src/modules/jserv/libjserv.a

on a apache build but then I get a mod_jserv httpd and mod_perl is gone.
If I try to activate-module for both mod_perl and mod_jserv I get a lot of
mod_perl errors.  Suggestions would be appreciated.

Jeff




RE: oracle : The lowdown

2000-01-11 Thread Jeff Warner
Title: RE: oracle : The lowdown




	Personally, I hate conversions.  I've managed and used Oracle
databases over 4TB with billions of records. The way I figure it, once
I'm up and running on Oracle, I won't worry about the database again. 
I'm sure there are a number of other valid considerations but for my
money, I'll stick with Oracle.

Jeff 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 1/11/00, 3:54:18 PM, "David Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding RE: oracle : The lowdown:


> Jeff Warner wrote:
> > We were a mySQL shop.  We replaced mySQL with Oracle8i/mod_perl
and
> > and Apache::DBI.  Works great, once it is all setup.  Our overall
> > processing is faster with Oracle too.  The lack of transactions and
> > views put an immediate end of mySQL once we got into the details of
my
> > project.
> >
> > Oracle is overkill for smaller task but you don't have to worry
about
> > outgrowing it.

> What about PostgreSQL (www.postgresql.org)? It looks like it has
transaction
> management (commit, rollback) with the whole concurrency control
thing. I
> don't know if has views. I've got a small project that I am figuring
on
> using PostgreSQL for, so I'm curious to hear what people might have
to say
> about it.

> Another option to look at is Solid (www.solidtech.com). They just
quoted me
> their Solid Embedded Server (their name for a database server) for
$2,000
> per CPU. I used their database server a few years ago and it was very
nice.
> Back then it cost only $200, too... :-)

>  - David Harris
>Principal Engineer, DRH Internet Services




Re: oracle : The lowdown

2000-01-11 Thread Jeff Warner
Title: Re: oracle : The lowdown




	We were a mySQL shop.  We replaced mySQL with Oracle8i/mod_perl and
and Apache::DBI.  Works great, once it is all setup.  Our overall
processing is faster with Oracle too.  The lack of transactions and
views put an immediate end of mySQL once we got into the details of my
project.  

	Oracle is overkill for smaller task but you don't have to worry about
outgrowing it.

Jeff 

>> Original Message <<

On 1/11/00, 1:54:14 PM, John Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding oracle : The lowdown:


> Hello all-
>   I just got the word from down high that VC's will freak out
> if they see we are using mysql and now we are looking at an Oracle
> solution.

>   The product is a mid level mod perl application that will
> receive ~500,000 hits a day. I want to engineer it to withstand up to
> 2 million hits per day ( not unique users ).  Does anyone have good
> or bad stories about using Oracle with mod_perl/DBI/Apache::DBI? I
> would love to hear both sides of the coin. I personally think Oracle
> is overkill but I don't have any major issues with it.

> I am also searching the archives for problem reports but I was hoping
> for some anecdotal evidence about the positive or negative of this
> move.

> Thanks!
> John Armstrong


> ---
> 'Gone With The Wind' is going to be the biggest flop in the history
> of Hollywood. I'm just glad it'll be Clark Gable who's falling flat
> on his face and not Gary Cooper.
>   -Gary Cooper, 1938