Re: 2 servers based on .htaccess authentication

2000-11-29 Thread Robert Waldstein


 So, you could put the config for the heavy server in .htaccess_heavy
 and the front-end config in .htaccess.

Sorry - didn't make myself clear.  The protection on the files are the same -
just too complex for the front-end to understand (since use modperl).
  So if there is any authentication needed I want the front-end to give up
and let the heavy server handle it.  So even in the model you describe all I
want the front-end .htaccess to do is to cause a proxyPass - can that be
done is my question / problem.
  thanks,  Bob Waldstein  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: 2 servers based on .htaccess authentication

2000-11-29 Thread Robert Waldstein



 As long as you can garantee that the URI of the resource is not accessible
 multiple ways you could use a Location/ directive on the relative path.

Trouble with this is my problem arises out of a (deliberate) lack of central
control.  That is, I have thousands of directories, and the web administrators
are allowed to protect them as they please, using .htaccess files.
   So I cannot maintain any centralized list (as in a apache config file).
   
   Actually as I continue to think on it my solution seems reasonable - 
just haven't figured out yet which part of the light-weight server is
complaining about incomprehensible commands in the .htaccess - thought
apache would let my module see it before complaining.
  Hm - maybe I have to go earlier in the cycle so I can say:
 if (.htaccess control) proxyPass
 
 time to get back out the eagle book...
bob  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]