RE: [JOB] Perl / mod_perl programmer in Orem, UT
Untrue... Portland is full of queens -Original Message- From: Jean-Michel Hiver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:11 AM To: Jonathan M. Hollin Cc: Cahill, Earl; modperl Subject: Re: [JOB] Perl / mod_perl programmer in Orem, UT Yet again I ask myself - why don't I emigrate to the US? :-( Coz they don't have a Queen? :-) -- IT'S TIME FOR A DIFFERENT KIND OF WEB Jean-Michel Hiver - Software Director [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 (0)114 255 8097 VISIT HTTP://WWW.MKDOC.COM
RE: Growing Server Size modperl-2.0 on Solaris 2.7
Greetings, Have noticed that modperl-2.0 servers running on Solaris 2.7 start off at 23M in size. Five hours later they were at 38M. If allowed to continue they could eventually use up all available RAM and crash the system. Stopping then restarting returned them to 23M. Has anyone else encountered this and is there a recommended solution other than periodically stopping and starting? Hey John, I don't see that on my Solaris 8 box (unless I throw some weak code at it). BTW: There was a reason Sun created 8. ;)
RE: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted
Old fashioned is right, Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List? Hang on Ged, I'm thinking that there might be a community opportunity to develop a library of tools that will solve the obvious problem here. Would it be possible to provide a solution for visionless, stuck in the 80's management practices with mod_perl? If the answer to this question is yes then we can view this thread as a requirements doc. S
RE: email attachments; was modperl growth
Since Balmer and Gates consider open anything to be a threat to corporate intellectual property it's not likely that they will do this. If you ask nicely, though, they will steal it and call it ActivePGP - then sell it back to you. Rod Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm sorry, but it was a GPG (a free PGP) signed message. Outlook is really lost when it sees that and, since you've bought it from Microsoft, I think you should send them a request for them to implement OpenPGP standards in their mail reader. Unfortunately, you (don't) get what you paid for...
Documentation
I know there is some good reference material for mod_perl out there, just can't remember where. Anybody?
RE: Help...
In most cases Apache basic auth passwords are set by the htpasswd command that should be available in the Apache source. In order to use this from a perl script you might have to set the SUID bit of htpasswd and make it owned by the Apache user. By writing a small script to take password information and making the appropriate call to htpasswd you should achieve your goal. As always, it's recommended to use SSL when doing something like this. Hope that helps Hello All, I am a programmer who is currently working in UK on a Apache Project.I have a question.one of my project member has developed some html pages relating to Project authontication just like those of Apache Basic Authontication.Now my question is, can i change the password(which is in the header of the HTTP protocol)which is cached by browse throught out the session, when i send a request to Apache Server using Perl script if so how can we do that .I will be help full to the person who can give the solution.Thanks in advance. JK __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RE: Solaris + Apache + mod_perl = TROUBLE
Try showrev -p for a list of installed patches. -Original Message- From: Philip M. Gollucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Re: Solaris + Apache + mod_perl = TROUBLE I can't control what patches they have or have not applied... Is there anyway I can check myself ? I'm more of a BSD/FreeBSD expert.
RE: Solaris + Apache + mod_perl = TROUBLE
I apologize, I'm afraid I was lost in my brevity :). showrev -p will return a list of installed Solaris system patches. Try showrev -p for a list of installed patches. -Original Message- From: Philip M. Gollucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: Re: Solaris + Apache + mod_perl = TROUBLE I can't control what patches they have or have not applied... Is there anyway I can check myself ? I'm more of a BSD/FreeBSD expert.
