RE: Apache::Request for CGI? (was: Re: A::Registry vs. mod_perl handler philosophy)

[Jesse Erlbaum]

Hi Joe --

 +1.  Scripting _inside_ the server opens up possibilities that
 are unimaginable to folks who are content confining themselves 
 to the lowest common denominator (CGI).

Perhaps you could bullet-point a few of these possibilities for those of
us who are confined by our lack of imagination?


TTYL,

-Jesse-


--

  Jesse Erlbaum
  The Erlbaum Group
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Phone: 212-684-6161
  Fax: 212-684-6226

Apache::Request for CGI? (was: Re: A::Registry vs. mod_perl handler philosophy)

[Joe Schaefer]

Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[...]

 I'm late to the party, but here's an old post of mine that sums up my
 opinion:
 
 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperlm=95440118003848w=2

+1.  Scripting _inside_ the server opens up possibilities that
are unimaginable to folks who are content confining themselves 
to the lowest common denominator (CGI).

That said, apreq-dev is looking for someone to adopt and 
develop the CGI port of libapreq-2/Apache::Request. I'm shooting
for a developer release of libapreq-2 before OSCON, and it'd be 
_really_ cool if we had a functional CGI port available.

-- 
Joe Schaefer