Re: Compiling mod_perl as a DSO? (fwd)

[Bill Bradford]

On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 10:37:24PM -0800, Michael Robinton wrote:
> I read on the list at one time that the DSO verson has a memory leak. 
> Don't know if this is still true or not. The static version apparently 
> did not have that problem. If someone knows the answer to this I'd like 
> to know myself as the DSO version is considerably easier to put together 
> with other modules.

Exactly - right now, there's no easy way to compile a static 
apache + mod_perl + php3.  Heck, I cant even get apache + mod_perl
to work (I need to do --enable-module=so during apache configuration,
but the modperl setup/build re-configures apache and leaves it out).

I'd be happy with being able to do apache + static mod_perl + DSO'ed
PHP3, if anybody can point out how to do apache + static mod_perl +
"--enable-module=so".

Thanks.

Bill

-- 
+---+--+--+
|Bill Bradford  | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|http://www.sunhelp.org | http://www.pdp11.org | http://www.mrbill.net|
+---+--+--+

Re: Compiling mod_perl as a DSO? (fwd)

[Michael Robinton]

On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Bill Bradford wrote:

> Is it possible to compile/install mod_perl as a DSO, on an existing
> pre-compiled copy of apache (with mod_so enabled), yet?  If so, 
> how?  I couldnt find it in the docs... and I'm tired of having to
> statically compile the module in... so any help would be appreciated.
> 
I read on the list at one time that the DSO verson has a memory leak. 
Don't know if this is still true or not. The static version apparently 
did not have that problem. If someone knows the answer to this I'd like 
to know myself as the DSO version is considerably easier to put together 
with other modules.

Michael