Re: Mason vs. Apache::Registry
Kelly White wrote: I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using Mason would make cleaner code, but it wouldn't get compiled, would it? Any help you can give is appreciated. Thanks, Like Ken said, its a feature vs. speed tradeoff: Here's some numbers for you, on the same box, which is the best way to compare: http://www.chamas.com/bench/hello_bysystem.html#group20 -- Joshua _ Joshua Chamas Chamas Enterprises Inc. NodeWorks free web link monitoring Huntington Beach, CA USA http://www.nodeworks.com1-714-625-4051
Mason vs. Apache::Registry
I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using Mason would make cleaner code, but it wouldn't get compiled, would it? Any help you can give is appreciated. Thanks, mckhendry __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/
Re: Mason vs. Apache::Registry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelly White) wrote: I am considering using either HTML::Mason or Apache::Registry for my CGI scripts, but am not sure which is faster. Would the template/pages be cached like the scripts are in Registry? Which would be faster? Obviously using Mason would make cleaner code, but it wouldn't get compiled, would it? Any help you can give is appreciated. Thanks, Under Mason: * Yes, the templates (components) are cached, both on disk and in memory. * Yes, components are pre-compiled into Perl subroutines. * In addition, there's a fairly comprehensive cache control system that lets you control caching of certain parts of the output based on whatever parameters you need. Mason can still be slower than Registry, but that's because Mason does more for you. It's a whole framework. It can also be faster than Registry if you take advantage of its advanced caching stuff (and if it would have been too much hassle to do something similar under Registry). Just like Perl can often be faster than C because writing the equivalent C can be too much hassle.
