Re: Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module?
Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexei V. Barantsev) wrote:
>
> >Jerrad Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> > On 11 Jul 2000, Alexei V. Barantsev wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > >From command line all is ok
> >> > >
> >> > > Untitled Document
> >> > > File::Copy::copydir ok
> >> > > File::Recurse::recurse ok
> >> > >
> >> > > In mod_perl I have the the different result
> >> > >
> >> > > Untitled Document
> >> > > File::Copy::copydir ok
> >> > > File::Recurse::recurse failed
> >> > >
> >> > > Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module???
> >
> >This script works right from command line if I run it as 'apache' -
> >user account I have specially for httpd.
> >
> >But the scripts failed to find File::Recurse::recurse if running under
> >usual mod_cgi!
Sorry, it was disinformation, under mod_cgi the script works as
expected, all is ok, the problem appears only in mod_perl environment.
> >By the way, %File::Recurse:: contains symbol for 'recurse', so I can't
> >understant why it is not defined...
>
>
> It seems like you're loading two different modules, perhaps. Try
> printing out $INC{'File/Recurse.pm'} and see whether it's different
> under command line (or CGI) & mod_perl.
I'm loadind the same module, in both cases
$INC{'File/Recurse.pm'} eq /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/File/Recurse.pm
> Also, make doubly sure that your mod_perl & standalone perl are using
> the same perl binary. Do you have more than one?
I have only one perl executable, version 5.005_03 built for i386-linux
I could not understand the following: %File::Recurse:: contains symbol
for 'recurse' but none of ($|@|%|&)recurse is defined. Is it possible
to ask perl FOR WHAT have it created this symbol?
--
ab
ICQ: 3959207
Re: Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexei V. Barantsev) wrote:
>Jerrad Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> But nobody is typically a rather priveleged account...
>>
>> >
>> > On 11 Jul 2000, Alexei V. Barantsev wrote:
>> >
>> > > >From command line all is ok
>> > >
>> > > Untitled Document
>> > > File::Copy::copydir ok
>> > > File::Recurse::recurse ok
>> > >
>> > > In mod_perl I have the the different result
>> > >
>> > > Untitled Document
>> > > File::Copy::copydir ok
>> > > File::Recurse::recurse failed
>> > >
>> > > Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module???
>> >
>> > Probably permissions. Under mod_perl you are running as "nobody".
>> > - Perrin
>> >
>
>No, the problem is not in permissions. And not in mod_perl :(
>
>This script works right from command line if I run it as 'apache' -
>user account I have specially for httpd.
>
>But the scripts failed to find File::Recurse::recurse if running under
>usual mod_cgi!
>
>By the way, %File::Recurse:: contains symbol for 'recurse', so I can't
>understant why it is not defined...
It seems like you're loading two different modules, perhaps. Try
printing out $INC{'File/Recurse.pm'} and see whether it's different
under command line (or CGI) & mod_perl.
Also, make doubly sure that your mod_perl & standalone perl are using
the same perl binary. Do you have more than one?
------
Ken Williams Last Bastion of Euclidity
[EMAIL PROTECTED]The Math Forum
Re: Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module?
Jerrad Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But nobody is typically a rather priveleged account... > > > > > On 11 Jul 2000, Alexei V. Barantsev wrote: > > > > > >From command line all is ok > > > > > > Untitled Document > > > File::Copy::copydir ok > > > File::Recurse::recurse ok > > > > > > In mod_perl I have the the different result > > > > > > Untitled Document > > > File::Copy::copydir ok > > > File::Recurse::recurse failed > > > > > > Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module??? > > > > Probably permissions. Under mod_perl you are running as "nobody". > > - Perrin > > No, the problem is not in permissions. And not in mod_perl :( This script works right from command line if I run it as 'apache' - user account I have specially for httpd. But the scripts failed to find File::Recurse::recurse if running under usual mod_cgi! By the way, %File::Recurse:: contains symbol for 'recurse', so I can't understant why it is not defined... -- ab ICQ: 3959207
RE: Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module?
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote: > But nobody is typically a rather priveleged account... Permissions are permissions. If you want the nobody user to read the files and directories, they have to be accessible by that user. > > > Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module??? > > > > Probably permissions. Under mod_perl you are running as "nobody". > > - Perrin
RE: Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module?
But nobody is typically a rather priveleged account... > -Original Message- > From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 2:45 PM > To: Alexei V. Barantsev > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module? > > > On 11 Jul 2000, Alexei V. Barantsev wrote: > > > >From command line all is ok > > > > Untitled Document > > File::Copy::copydir ok > > File::Recurse::recurse ok > > > > In mod_perl I have the the different result > > > > Untitled Document > > File::Copy::copydir ok > > File::Recurse::recurse failed > > > > Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module??? > > Probably permissions. Under mod_perl you are running as "nobody". > - Perrin >
Re: Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module?
On 11 Jul 2000, Alexei V. Barantsev wrote: > >From command line all is ok > > Untitled Document > File::Copy::copydir ok > File::Recurse::recurse ok > > In mod_perl I have the the different result > > Untitled Document > File::Copy::copydir ok > File::Recurse::recurse failed > > Why mod_perl does not like File::Recurse module??? Probably permissions. Under mod_perl you are running as "nobody". - Perrin
