hi all

2000-10-11 Thread Rajesh Mathachan

hi all,
we have a query which goes to 7kb and we use mysql and php , th eserver
is literally crashing when we do the process 
what is the other alternative fpor me
The site is  aQuiz site 
regards
rajesh mathachan

--
QuantumLink Communications, Bombay, India





Re: hi all

2000-10-11 Thread Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd

Hi,

We had a similar problem with postgres db.
We had a large query running to 3 kb and the query ran forever without ever
getting completed.
We solved this, by breaking the query into parts and executing each part
separately... i.e., by creating a hash of the output of one step and filter
it into the next step and so on...

Hope this helps.

Murali

- Original Message -
From: Rajesh Mathachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 2:34 PM
Subject: hi all


 hi all,
 we have a query which goes to 7kb and we use mysql and php , th eserver
 is literally crashing when we do the process
 what is the other alternative fpor me
 The site is  aQuiz site
 regards
 rajesh mathachan

 --
 QuantumLink Communications, Bombay, India






Re: [OT] hi all

2000-10-11 Thread Rodney Broom

RM we have a query which goes to 7kb...

"7 kb"? I don't mean to be picky, but do you mean "seven kilo-bytes"? I'm
thinking that either you mean some much larger number, or that I'm missing
something terribly.

Either way, what does your query look like? Are you joining across 3 tables and
then back onto one of those tables again, and then using a bunch of LIKEs and
ORs? Or is this just a simple "select * from xyz"?

If it isn't obvious from your query as to what's the problems, then we should
probably know a bit about your server config. Like, "We're running on Win3.11".
;-)


Rodney Broom






Re: [OT] hi all

2000-10-11 Thread Dave Baker

On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 08:24:13PM -0700, Rodney Broom wrote:
 RM we have a query which goes to 7kb...
 
 "7 kb"? I don't mean to be picky, but do you mean "seven kilo-bytes"? I'm
 thinking that either you mean some much larger number, or that I'm missing
 something terribly.
 

I read this as meaning the QUERY string is 7k in size, not the result set.

A 7k query is pretty hefty, however you slice it  the words 'stored
procedure' come to mind (but that's always another story)


dave


-- 

-  Dave Baker  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  :  http://dsb3.com/  :  AIM#duirwyrd  -
GPG: 1024D/D7BCA55D / 09CD D148 57DE 711E 6708  B772 0DD4 51D5 D7BC A55D


 PGP signature


Re: [OT] hi all

2000-10-11 Thread Rodney Broom

DB I read this as meaning the QUERY string is 7k in size, not the result set.

Hmm, I didn't think of that. Yes, that would be a big query.

DB ...the words 'stored
DB procedure' come to mind (but that's always another story)

Yes, no stored proceedures in mysql. But if this does refer to 7KB of text in
the query, then I have to think that there's a better way to write it. I wrote a
little search engine that did a bit of:

where (
  id = 3 or
  id = 5 or
  id = 2838
 ...
)
But that was to get around a bad LIKE statement. And it actually runs pretty
well. My thought would still be that the statement can probably be cleaned up a
bit. Hey Rajesh, I know that you probably don't want to share the exactities of
the query for business reasons, but any indication you can give would help in my
oppinion.


Rodney Broom