Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:48 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list at apreq-...@httpd.apache.org. t/big_requestok t/cgiok t/cookie.ok t/request31/36 # Failed test 34 in t/request.t at line 93 fail #2 t/request36/36 # Failed test 36 in t/request.t at line 118 fail #2 t/request Failed 2/36 subtests t/upload.ok Are these regressions or did we have these before? I'm having a feeling that's the same SSL stuff we've seen before. -- Bojan
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.09-RC2
Are we going to have 2.09 release? It's been quite some time since RC2 went out... -- Bojan
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: libapreq2 2.09-RC1
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:08 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Please download, test, and report back on the following candidate tarball: http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09-rc1.tar.gz This builds on Fedora Development and it will appear in the repository when the packages get signed. Could you continue the previous tradition of calling the directory inside the tarball libapreq-2.09, not libapreq-2.09-rc1? It makes RPM building a bit cleaner... -- Bojan
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]: libapreq2 2.09-RC1
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 19:32 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Might you be able to run the test suite in 2 cases: 1 - With LWP installed 2 - Without LWP installed (APACHE_TEST_PRETEND_NO_LWP=1 make test) 1. All tests OK. 2. I get: All tests successful, 4 tests skipped (second lot of tests). This is on today's snapshot of Fedora Development (a.k.a what FC6 is going to be). -- Bojan
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC3
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 03:39 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Please download, test, and VOTE on the following candidate tarball: http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz Weird. I'm getting errors when unpacking the tarball: - -rw-r--r-- pgollucci/wheel 5921 2006-07-08 19:36 libapreq2-2.08/win32/libapreq2.mak -rw-r--r-- pgollucci/wheel 4321 2006-07-08 19:36 libapreq2-2.08/win32/mod_apreq2.mak -rw-r--r-- pgollucci/wheel 1516 2006-07-08 19:36 libapreq2-2.08/win32/README -rw-r--r-- pgollucci/wheel 4184 2006-07-08 19:36 libapreq2-2.08/win32/test_cgi.mak -rw-r--r-- pgollucci/wheel977 2006-07-08 19:36 libapreq2-2.08/win32/util.pl tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors - What's the MD5 supposed to be? -- Bojan
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC3
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 13:27 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: 3b8b52c261c72adc971b656ca77f6eab libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/pgollucci/public_html/apreq2 rv=0 52 md5 libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz MD5 (libapreq2-2.08-RC3.tar.gz) = 3b8b52c261c72adc971b656ca77f6eab OK. That seems the same, so it's not a download problem on my end. You don't see similar problems when unpacking on your end, do you? BTW, Fedora build system (i.e. the machine I don't control, probably running RHEL or something like that) also whinged on unpacking and it wouldn't build the RPM. Build log is here: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/12379-libapreq2-2.08-0.rc3.1.fc6/i386/build.log -- Bojan
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC3
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 13:41 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Works fine, I just untarred it here: http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq/libapreq2-2.08 OK. I'm off to work now anyway - I'll try unpacking on machines there. -- Bojan
Re: libapreq2-2.04-dev release candidate #2
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 02:16, Joe Schaefer wrote: Folks, please try this release candidate and report any issues on the apreq-dev@ mailing list: http://cvs.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.04-dev-rc2.tar.gz RPMS for Fedore Core 2 are available from here: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/libapreq2/ The Perl part requires mod_perl-1.99_16. When you attempt to install this RPM, there are dependency issues. However, Stas assured me that these are actually not required to run mod_perl. I'm not a Perl guy, so I can really check, but if someone does try that combo, it would be good to know if there is something really wrong. In the meantime, I'll try to figure out from the comments Stas provided how to fix this dependency problem. The mod_perl RPMS are here: ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/mod-perl/ Let me know... -- Bojan -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
