Re: -X and trapping kill?

2007-10-09 Thread Fred Moyer 

Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:

Bill Moseley wrote:

Must be Monday.  Is there a problem with the -X switch and prefork?

I'm using:

Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8e mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8


for Apache/2.x, Shouldn't that now be:

$ httpd -DONE_PROCESS -DNO_DETACH


This is happening on my setup also, Apache 2.2.3, mod_perl 2.0.3, perl 
5.8.8, using a standard xterm to send the interrupt.

Re: -X and trapping kill?

2007-09-18 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson 
Bill Moseley wrote:
 Must be Monday.  Is there a problem with the -X switch and prefork?
 
 I'm using:
 
 Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8e mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8

for Apache/2.x, Shouldn't that now be:

$ httpd -DONE_PROCESS -DNO_DETACH


Philippe M. Chiasson GPG: F9BFE0C2480E7680 1AE53631CB32A107 88C3A5A5
http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/   m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: -X and trapping kill?

2007-09-18 Thread bharanee rathna 
yes,  but AFAIK -X is a shortcut for -DONE_PROCESS. But then I may be wrong
but a quick check now shows me that using -DONE_PROCESS, apache2 ignores
SIGINT

On 9/18/07, Philippe M. Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bill Moseley wrote:
  Must be Monday.  Is there a problem with the -X switch and prefork?
 
  I'm using:
 
  Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8e mod_perl/2.0.2
 Perl/v5.8.8

 for Apache/2.x, Shouldn't that now be:

 $ httpd -DONE_PROCESS -DNO_DETACH

 
 Philippe M. Chiasson GPG: F9BFE0C2480E7680 1AE53631CB32A107 88C3A5A5
 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/   m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/

-X and trapping kill?

2007-09-17 Thread Bill Moseley 
Must be Monday.  Is there a problem with the -X switch and prefork?

I'm using:

Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8e mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8


I have a very small config and when I run with -X it starts a single
process but I can't control-C to kill it.   I can't even kill from
another xterm, I have to kill -9 it.

Tried also on Ubuntu, but it's the same versions as above.



-- 
Bill Moseley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: -X and trapping kill?

2007-09-17 Thread Fred Moyer 

Bill Moseley wrote:

Must be Monday.  Is there a problem with the -X switch and prefork?

I'm using:

Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8e mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8


I have a very small config and when I run with -X it starts a single
process but I can't control-C to kill it.   I can't even kill from
another xterm, I have to kill -9 it.

Tried also on Ubuntu, but it's the same versions as above.


Just to rule out that it's not the terminal causing the problem, what 
happens if you run a program like this and ctrl+c?  I'm not seeing the 
behavior you are describing with 2.2.4/2.0.3/5.8.8 on darwin.


#!perl

use strict;
use warnings;

$SIG{INT} = sub { warn('hello interrupt') };

while (1) {
next;
}

Re: -X and trapping kill?

2007-09-17 Thread bharanee rathna 
Hi guys, this is a known issue reported at

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38848

and not modperl related.

On 9/18/07, Fred Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bill Moseley wrote:
  Must be Monday.  Is there a problem with the -X switch and prefork?
 
  I'm using:
 
  Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8e mod_perl/2.0.2
 Perl/v5.8.8
 
 
  I have a very small config and when I run with -X it starts a single
  process but I can't control-C to kill it.   I can't even kill from
  another xterm, I have to kill -9 it.
 
  Tried also on Ubuntu, but it's the same versions as above.

 Just to rule out that it's not the terminal causing the problem, what
 happens if you run a program like this and ctrl+c?  I'm not seeing the
 behavior you are describing with 2.2.4/2.0.3/5.8.8 on darwin.

 #!perl

 use strict;
 use warnings;

 $SIG{INT} = sub { warn('hello interrupt') };

 while (1) {
  next;
 }