Re: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows
I found a copy and got it working. Don Woodward - Original Message - From: "Don Woodward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 19:24 Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows Attempting to make my own cert on my Win32 system at work it appears I'm missing the OpenSSL configuration file - see error below. I've built OpenSSL under Solaris before but my Sun is not up at the moment to get the file from - anyone have a configuration file example? C:\Apache\bin>openssl req -new -key server.key -out server.csr Unable to load config info Enter pass phrase for server.key: unable to find 'distinguished_name' in config problems making Certificate Request 672:error:0E06D06A:configuration file routines:NCONF_get_string:no conf or envir onment variable:.\crypto\conf\conf_lib.c:325: Thanks, Don Woodward - Original Message - From: "hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 20:48 Subject: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows I have just finished building the new Apache binaries for Windows. Apache 1.3.29 with mod_ssl and openssl Apache 2.0.48 with mod_ssl (built-in), openssl and zlib Only the newest files can be found here... http://hunter.campbus.com/ MD5's, and all previous builds can be found here... http://tor.ath.cx/~hunter/apache/ In addition to OpenSSL (made with MASM) I also added zlib to build mod_deflate.so in Apache 2.0.47-48 for those who are interested in using it - it is not configured, just like the mod_ssl.so. Note: some configuration is required. I build to c:\apache so if you use the same directory your configuration effort will be less, unless of course you are upgrading. Be careful though, Apache 1.3.xx conf is different from Apache 2.0.xx, and very early versions of Apache2 had differences with the latest versions. To install Apache (2.0.xx), follow these simple steps. (Apache 1.3.xx is similar but different) 1. create a directory (c:\apache) or if you are upgrading, save your httpd.conf or it could be overwritten. 2. unzip the binaries into this directory - make certain you created the sub-dirs. 3. go to the conf directory and edit httpd.conf or replace the httpd.conf with the one you saved. 4. go to the 'bin' directory in a console. Type the following commands: - if you are already installed, type 'apache -k uninstall' - then type 'apache -k install' - then type 'apache -k start' Check the error logs if it fails to start, but some configuration errors will be displayed in your console. Apache also logs to the event log. If you detect flaws in the build please email me so that I can fix them as soon as possible. I don't use these binaries so I need you to tell me if there is something wrong with them. I build a branded version in my workplace and use Apache2 on Debian/GNU Linux at home. Configuration questions should be directed to the list after reading the documentation and searching the list archives - let everyone benefit from the answers you get. Chris Lewis __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows
Attempting to make my own cert on my Win32 system at work it appears I'm missing the OpenSSL configuration file - see error below. I've built OpenSSL under Solaris before but my Sun is not up at the moment to get the file from - anyone have a configuration file example? C:\Apache\bin>openssl req -new -key server.key -out server.csr Unable to load config info Enter pass phrase for server.key: unable to find 'distinguished_name' in config problems making Certificate Request 672:error:0E06D06A:configuration file routines:NCONF_get_string:no conf or envir onment variable:.\crypto\conf\conf_lib.c:325: Thanks, Don Woodward - Original Message - From: "hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 20:48 Subject: Apache 1.3.29 and 2.0.48 with SSL binaries for Windows I have just finished building the new Apache binaries for Windows. Apache 1.3.29 with mod_ssl and openssl Apache 2.0.48 with mod_ssl (built-in), openssl and zlib Only the newest files can be found here... http://hunter.campbus.com/ MD5's, and all previous builds can be found here... http://tor.ath.cx/~hunter/apache/ In addition to OpenSSL (made with MASM) I also added zlib to build mod_deflate.so in Apache 2.0.47-48 for those who are interested in using it - it is not configured, just like the mod_ssl.so. Note: some configuration is required. I build to c:\apache so if you use the same directory your configuration effort will be less, unless of course you are upgrading. Be careful though, Apache 1.3.xx conf is different from Apache 2.0.xx, and very early versions of Apache2 had differences with the latest versions. To install Apache (2.0.xx), follow these simple steps. (Apache 1.3.xx is similar but different) 1. create a directory (c:\apache) or if you are upgrading, save your httpd.conf or it could be overwritten. 2. unzip the binaries into this directory - make certain you created the sub-dirs. 3. go to the conf directory and edit httpd.conf or replace the httpd.conf with the one you saved. 4. go to the 'bin' directory in a console. Type the following commands: - if you are already installed, type 'apache -k uninstall' - then type 'apache -k install' - then type 'apache -k start' Check the error logs if it fails to start, but some configuration errors will be displayed in your console. Apache also logs to the event log. If you detect flaws in the build please email me so that I can fix them as soon as possible. I don't use these binaries so I need you to tell me if there is something wrong with them. I build a branded version in my workplace and use Apache2 on Debian/GNU Linux at home. Configuration questions should be directed to the list after reading the documentation and searching the list archives - let everyone benefit from the answers you get. Chris Lewis __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: apache 1.3.29?
>-Original Message- >From: Andreas Gietl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Mr Engelschall said yesterday on this list: Arggg... I must've missed this... And I was especially looking out for it! my bad... Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > >Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've >already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include >some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, so no need >to hurry here... > Ralf S. Engelschall > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.engelschall.com > > >> Just to ask the question... Is a mod_ssl_2.8.16-1.3.29 forseen? >> >> Rgds, >> Owen Boyle >> Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. >> >> >-Original Message- >> >> From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54 >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: Re: apache 1.3.29? >> > >> > >> >Hi Ralf, >> > >> >If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS >> >env variable >> >to be passed by suexec >> > >> >--- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat >> >Jul 19 09:27:31 >> >2003 >> >+++ apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c Tue Aug 26 16:49:20 2003 >> >@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ >> > /* variable name starts with */ >> > "HTTP_", >> > #ifdef MOD_SSL >> >-"HTTPS_", >> >+"HTTPS=", >> > "SSL_", >> > #endif >> > >> >This is already included in apache 2 >> > >> >Thanks, >> > >> >Zvi. >> > >> > >> >On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote >> > >> >about "Re: apache 1.3.29?": >> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >you wrote: >> >> > Andreas Gietl wrote: >> >> >> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? >> >> > >> >> > I would guess, but that's not my area :) >> >> >> >> Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or >tomorrow. I've >> >> already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still >to include >> >> some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, >> > >> >so no need >> > >> >> to hurry here... >> >>Ralf S. Engelschall >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>www.engelschall.com >> > >> >>__ >> > >> >> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) >> >> www.modssl.org >> >> > User Support Mailing List >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Automated List Manager >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-- >e-admin internet gmbh >Andreas Gietltel >+49 941 3810884 >Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35 fax +49 >(0)1805/39160 - 29104 >93051 Regensburg mobil +49 171 6070008 > >PGP/GPG-Key unter http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html > > > > > This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache 1.3.29?
On Friday 31 October 2003 13:03, Boyle Owen wrote: Mr Engelschall said yesterday on this list: Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, so no need to hurry here... Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.engelschall.com > Just to ask the question... Is a mod_ssl_2.8.16-1.3.29 forseen? > > Rgds, > Owen Boyle > Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > >-Original Message- > > From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54 > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: apache 1.3.29? > > > > > >Hi Ralf, > > > >If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS > >env variable > >to be passed by suexec > > > >--- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat > >Jul 19 09:27:31 > >2003 > >+++ apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c Tue Aug 26 16:49:20 2003 > >@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ > > /* variable name starts with */ > > "HTTP_", > > #ifdef MOD_SSL > >-"HTTPS_", > >+"HTTPS=", > > "SSL_", > > #endif > > > >This is already included in apache 2 > > > >Thanks, > > > >Zvi. > > > > > >On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote > > > >about "Re: apache 1.3.29?": > >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> > Andreas Gietl wrote: > >> >> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> > >> >> i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > >> > > >> > I would guess, but that's not my area :) > >> > >> Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've > >> already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include > >> some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, > > > >so no need > > > >> to hurry here... > >>Ralf S. Engelschall > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>www.engelschall.com > > > >__ > > > >> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) > > www.modssl.org > > > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- e-admin internet gmbh Andreas Gietltel +49 941 3810884 Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35 fax +49 (0)1805/39160 - 29104 93051 Regensburg mobil +49 171 6070008 PGP/GPG-Key unter http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: apache 1.3.29?
Just to ask the question... Is a mod_ssl_2.8.16-1.3.29 forseen? Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. >-Original Message- >From: Zvi Har'El [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 09:54 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: apache 1.3.29? > > >Hi Ralf, > >If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS >env variable >to be passed by suexec > >--- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat >Jul 19 09:27:31 >2003 >+++ apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c Tue Aug 26 16:49:20 2003 >@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ > /* variable name starts with */ > "HTTP_", > #ifdef MOD_SSL >-"HTTPS_", >+"HTTPS=", > "SSL_", > #endif > >This is already included in apache 2 > >Thanks, > >Zvi. > > >On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote >about "Re: apache 1.3.29?": >> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> > Andreas Gietl wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >> i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? >> > >> > I would guess, but that's not my area :) >> >> Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've >> already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include >> some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, >so no need >> to hurry here... >>Ralf S. Engelschall >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>www.engelschall.com >> >> >__ >> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dr. Zvi Har'El mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Mathematics tel:+972-54-227607 icq:179294841 Technion - Israel Institute of Technology fax:+972-4-8293388 http://www.math.technion.ac.il/~rl/ Haifa 32000, ISRAEL "If you can't say somethin' nice, don't say nothin' at all." -- Thumper (1942) Thursday, 4 Heshvan 5764, 30 October 2003, 10:49AM __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of the sender's company. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache 1.3.29?
Hi Ralf, If you don't mind, please include a fix which allows the HTTPS env variable to be passed by suexec --- apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c.~20030719062731~ Sat Jul 19 09:27:31 2003 +++ apache_1.3.28/src/support/suexec.c Tue Aug 26 16:49:20 2003 @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ /* variable name starts with */ "HTTP_", #ifdef MOD_SSL -"HTTPS_", +"HTTPS=", "SSL_", #endif This is already included in apache 2 Thanks, Zvi. On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:06:52 +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote about "Re: apache 1.3.29?": > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Andreas Gietl wrote: > >> > >> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> > >> i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > > > > I would guess, but that's not my area :) > > Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've > already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include > some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, so no need > to hurry here... >Ralf S. Engelschall >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >www.engelschall.com > > __ > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dr. Zvi Har'El mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Mathematics tel:+972-54-227607 icq:179294841 Technion - Israel Institute of Technology fax:+972-4-8293388 http://www.math.technion.ac.il/~rl/ Haifa 32000, ISRAEL "If you can't say somethin' nice, don't say nothin' at all." -- Thumper (1942) Thursday, 4 Heshvan 5764, 30 October 2003, 10:49AM __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache 1.3.29?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Andreas Gietl wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > > I would guess, but that's not my area :) Yes, there will be a mod_ssl 2.8.16 released today or tomorrow. I've already upgraded mod_ssl to Apache 1.3.29, but I've still to include some other fixes. But 2.8.15 works fine with Apache 1.3.29, so no need to hurry here... Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.engelschall.com __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache 1.3.29?
Andreas Gietl wrote: > > On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > I would guess, but that's not my area :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache 1.3.29?
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 15:39, Jim Jagielski wrote: i guess there will be a new patch within the next days/hours? > Yes it will, but the patch will not apply "cleanly". Using --force > is recommended. > > Peter Horst wrote: > > Just noticed that apache 1.3.29 was released. Will mod_ssl-2.8.15 work > > with this? I'm using openssl-0.9.7c. > > > > Thanks much. > > > > Peter > > > > -- > > What do you use on Linux to do your word processing? spreadsheets? slide > > shows? Do you feel that ms-dos and ms-dos-office is really a better > > mouse trap and worth the price? We certainly differ on this point I > > think, because I believe Linux is definitely good enough for the average > > user, most of whom are idiots. > > -- Alan DuBoff, linux-elitists mailing list, 12/31/02 > > __ > > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- e-admin internet gmbh Andreas Gietltel +49 941 3810884 Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35 fax +49 (0)1805/39160 - 29104 93051 Regensburg mobil +49 171 6070008 PGP/GPG-Key unter http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache 1.3.29?
Yes it will, but the patch will not apply "cleanly". Using --force is recommended. Peter Horst wrote: > > Just noticed that apache 1.3.29 was released. Will mod_ssl-2.8.15 work > with this? I'm using openssl-0.9.7c. > > Thanks much. > > Peter > > -- > What do you use on Linux to do your word processing? spreadsheets? slide > shows? Do you feel that ms-dos and ms-dos-office is really a better > mouse trap and worth the price? We certainly differ on this point I > think, because I believe Linux is definitely good enough for the average > user, most of whom are idiots. > -- Alan DuBoff, linux-elitists mailing list, 12/31/02 > __ > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
