mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread Gabriel Lopez Millán



 When?
 Thanks, Gabi.

--
-
Gabriel Lopez Millan - Grupo ANTS-CIRCuS
Facultad de Informtica
Universidad de Murcia (Espaa) Tfo: +34 968367645



Re: mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread Mads Toftum

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:56:24PM +0100, Gabriel Lopez Millán wrote:
 
 When?
 
There will be no mod_ssl patch for apache 2.0.
Ralf donated the mod_ssl code to Apache and it has been included
in the Apache 2.0 distribution.

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
With a rubber duck, one's never alone.
  -- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall


In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:

When?

Apache 2.0.X already ships with mod_ssl, because we already ported mod_ssl to
Apache 2 a few months ago and gifted the source code to the ASF. This way
you no longer need an SSL/TLS add-on module for Apache 2.

   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mod_ssl-X.X.X-2.0.YY-tar.gz?

2002-01-17 Thread nirvana

Have problem building that under Windows.  Using cygwin.  Using the Visual C++ dsw/dsp 
projects.  Rest of Apache 2.0.28 builds fine.  Have put in openssl etc.  (Previously 
on same machine have successfully built 1.3.20 with mod_ssl, still do.)

The problem is specific to lex, specifically flex, processing
   lex.ssl_expr_yy.c(1753) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before 'constant'

Essentially that means there is a file ssl_expr_scan.l which is being used to generate 
ssl_expr_scan.c and that generation doesn't work right.  The .c file fails to compile.

A temporary workaround seems to be to skip lex/flex use the ssl_expr_scan.c file that 
comes with 2.0.28, but I have no idea whether that might actually be an (older) 
incorrect version then.

Any insights?

(I'm working with 1.3.20 meanwhile, just to get things done for a demo to keep this 
project alive, and because not sure how well mod_ssl works yet in 2.0.28.  I'd be 
willing to spend some time on this.  Just seems like another good size piece of source 
to learn...)

At 08:36 PM 1/17/02 +0100, you wrote:

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:

 When?

Apache 2.0.X already ships with mod_ssl, because we already ported mod_ssl to
Apache 2 a few months ago and gifted the source code to the ASF. This way
you no longer need an SSL/TLS add-on module for Apache 2.

Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]