Duplicated modules

2004-05-11 Thread Jose Alves de Castro
Take a look at the CPAN. Search for Roman. There's Roman,
Math::Roman, Text::Roman, Convert::Number::Roman, etc...

Isn't this duplicated effort? :-|

Besides, this may prevent the user from having all the available
functionalities without installing all of those modules... :-| And I'm
sure this isn't the only case.

What can be done about it?

If I have an improvement that could go on some of those modules, should
I e-mail all of the authors? :-|

-- 
Jos Alves de Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telbit - Tecnologias de Informao



Re: Duplicated modules

2004-05-11 Thread Andy Lester
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:33:00PM +0100, Jose Alves de Castro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
 What can be done about it?

You're asking us?  As if the topic hasn't been beaten to death over the
years?

Maybe the first thing that should be done about it is to have a FAQ that
addresses all the arguments and discussions.

 If I have an improvement that could go on some of those modules, should
 I e-mail all of the authors? :-|

I don't see why not.

-- 
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance


Re: Duplicated modules

2004-05-11 Thread Mark Stosberg
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:33:00PM +0100, Jose Alves de Castro wrote:
 Take a look at the CPAN. Search for Roman. There's Roman,
 Math::Roman, Text::Roman, Convert::Number::Roman, etc...
 
 Isn't this duplicated effort? :-|
 
 Besides, this may prevent the user from having all the available
 functionalities without installing all of those modules... :-| And I'm
 sure this isn't the only case.
 
 What can be done about it?

I'm a fan of using the 'rating' system available from each module page.
As ratings and comments accumulate, it will become easier for future
visitors to figure out which modules are worthwhile and why.

(It's certainly not a total solution, though! )

Mark


Re: Duplicated modules

2004-05-11 Thread Jose Alves de Castro
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 14:50, Andy Lester wrote:
 You're asking us?  As if the topic hasn't been beaten to death over the
 years?

Sorry... I didn't know that... :-|

Still... if it has been beaten to death over the years, it appears to me
it isn't quite dead, right?

 Maybe the first thing that should be done about it is to have a FAQ that
 addresses all the arguments and discussions.

I agree with that...

-- 
Jos Alves de Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telbit - Tecnologias de Informao



Application framework namespaces

2004-05-11 Thread Michael A Nachbaur
I'm working on a web application that is almost 100% perl (the styling is 
handled in XSL).  The entire application's test and installation procedure is 
managed with a Makefile.PL, and the entire package is very CPAN-ish.  I 
wanted to know if there was some place on CPAN that I can publish it so other 
people can deploy my application if they choose?

I'm using the namespace Nacho::AppName for my modules (Nacho being my IRC 
nick), but if there was an App::Foo namespace that could be used, I'd be 
willing to upload this to CPAN when I'm finished.

Does anyone see having this sort of code in CPAN as being useful?

-- 
Michael A. Nachbaur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nachbaur.com/pgpkey.asc