Re: Application framework namespaces

[Mark Stosberg]

On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:17:50PM -0400, _brian_d_foy wrote:
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael A Nachbaur
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The thing is, these are free-standing applications, and for the most part 
  aren't developer tools.  So, I was thinking an App:: namespace would work 
  well, (e.g.. App::WWW::NachoMusic, etc).
 
 I'd rather see top-level namespaces for complete applications.  I don't
 think the App::* adds any information. :)

I would imagine that  you meant to qualify this statement with an
assumption that the applications have decently unique names, and not
generic ones that might look like an existing standard use of a
top-level domain (CGI, HTML, Data, WWW, etc).  

Mark

Re: Application framework namespaces

[_brian_d_foy]

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Stosberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:17:50PM -0400, _brian_d_foy wrote:
  In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael A Nachbaur
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I'd rather see top-level namespaces for complete applications.  I don't
  think the App::* adds any information. :)

 I would imagine that  you meant to qualify this statement with an
 assumption that the applications have decently unique names, 

i didn't really care to do that, but you would have to anyway to
escape the wrath of the PAUSE and CPAN admins.

-- 
brian d foy, [EMAIL PROTECTED]