Re: configure_requires

[Michael G Schwern]

David E. Wheeler wrote:

On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:23, David E. Wheeler wrote:

I didn't see it in Changes, so I though I'd ask here: In what version 
of M::B was `configure_requires` added?


Oh, I see, it hasn't been released yet. But it is in the Perl 5.10 release.


Yeah, we need to get a release out the door.  A lot of bugs have been closed.


--
91. I am not authorized to initiate Jihad.
-- The 213 Things Skippy Is No Longer Allowed To Do In The U.S. Army
   http://skippyslist.com/?page_id=3

Re: configure_requires

[David E. Wheeler]

On Jan 22, 2008, at 10:23, David E. Wheeler wrote:

I didn't see it in Changes, so I though I'd ask here: In what  
version of M::B was `configure_requires` added?


Oh, I see, it hasn't been released yet. But it is in the Perl 5.10  
release.


Best,

David

configure_requires

[David E. Wheeler]

Hey,

I didn't see it in Changes, so I though I'd ask here: In what version  
of M::B was `configure_requires` added?


Thanks,

David

Re: Module::Build interim release

[Craig A. Berry]

At 3:48 PM -0600 1/21/08, Ken Williams wrote:

>Also, almost all the changes involve small tweaks to the tests to make
>them pass (or skip) under VMS.  I'm of the opinion that in the M::B
>mainline code, we shouldn't integrate the changes that just skip under
>VMS, e.g. the following:
>
>-
> SKIP: {
>+skip "Needs case and syntax tweaks for VMS", 1 if $^O eq 'VMS';
>-
>
>, on the theory that it's better to fix than hide.

I'm in complete agreement with that.  We just punted on a couple of
things because we ran out of time before 5.10.
-- 

Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"... getting out of a sonnet is much more
 difficult than getting in."
 Brad Leithauser