RE: mon 1.0.0pre2 and mon-client 1.0.0pre2 are in cvs on sourcefo rge

2004-06-22 Thread Tim Klein
Very glad to see the big set of "Nolan patches" getting
integrated into the mainstream.  Thanks for the good stuff,
Jim and David!
Tim Klein
Dallas, Texas
On a more serious note, Jim and I are working pretty closely now on 
the new Mon code via sourceforge.  All of my changes have been 
applied to the CVS repository, and once we've tested them a fair bit 
you can expect to see a mon-devel-1.1.X branch available.

(Of course, I'm about to head to conferences for two weeks.  Anyone 
on the list going to be at Usenix?)

-David
David Nolan<*>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
curses: May you be forced to grep the termcap of an unclean yacc while
 a herd of rogue emacs fsck your troff and vgrind your pathalias!
___
mon mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


RE: mon 1.0.0pre2 and mon-client 1.0.0pre2 are in cvs on sourcefo rge

2004-06-21 Thread David Nolan

--On Monday, June 21, 2004 7:20 AM -0700 Jim Trocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Peter Wirdemo (MO/EMW) wrote:
It must be a little odd, releasing a 1-0-0 version, for a software
nearly 10 years old...
not really odd at all--it's just the next release version. it could be
named anything at all. would "7" be a better version number?

How about Pi?
On a more serious note, Jim and I are working pretty closely now on the new 
Mon code via sourceforge.  All of my changes have been applied to the CVS 
repository, and once we've tested them a fair bit you can expect to see a 
mon-devel-1.1.X branch available.

(Of course, I'm about to head to conferences for two weeks.  Anyone on the 
list going to be at Usenix?)

-David
David Nolan<*>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
curses: May you be forced to grep the termcap of an unclean yacc while
 a herd of rogue emacs fsck your troff and vgrind your pathalias!
___
mon mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


RE: mon 1.0.0pre2 and mon-client 1.0.0pre2 are in cvs on sourcefo rge

2004-06-21 Thread Jim Trocki
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Peter Wirdemo (MO/EMW) wrote:

> 
> It must be a little odd, releasing a 1-0-0 version, for a software nearly 10 years 
> old...

not really odd at all--it's just the next release version. it could be named
anything at all. would "7" be a better version number?

___
mon mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon


RE: mon 1.0.0pre2 and mon-client 1.0.0pre2 are in cvs on sourcefo rge

2004-06-21 Thread Peter Wirdemo (MO/EMW)

It must be a little odd, releasing a 1-0-0 version, for a software nearly 10 years 
old...

/Peter

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Trocki
Sent: den 18 juni 2004 22:21
To: mon mailing list
Subject: mon 1.0.0pre2 and mon-client 1.0.0pre2 are in cvs on
sourceforge


http://www.kernel.org/software/mon/development.html

mon-1-0-0pre1 is the branch name, but i've just tagged the files as of
today mon-1-0-0pre2.

the perl module is also tagged similarly, mon-client-1-0-0pre2.

i've also uploaded the tarballs to kernel.org:

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/software/admin/mon/devel/

it'll take a little bit before it's pushed out to the mirrors.

i've also noticed that :pserver: access on cvs.sourceforge.net is a
read-only mirror of the working repository, and that mirror seems to be
updated only daily, so it's likely the changes i've made today (the pre2
stuff) won't show up there until later.

thanks to david nolan for applying his patches to the head branch (if
you don't specify "cvs co -r", this is what you'll get) and to all the
others who have contributed code and patches.

if you have problems with this release, let us know and we'll try to
get the code or docs fixed for the final 1.0.0 release.

___
mon mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon

___
mon mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon