Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
Hello, I'm having trouble building today's tarball (20110204). 'mod' fails to build: make[8]: Entering directory `/xxx/home/baileyj/mono-20110204/mcs/tools/mod' MCS [net_4_0] mod.exe error CS0006: Metadata file `./../../class/lib/net_2_0/monodoc.dll' could not be found Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings Could it be related to the new SDK flag? monodoc.dll does not show up under any directory after running make. I don't think it's related, this looks like you are building 4.0 profile only which is not (yet) allowed. Marek ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
I tried ./configure --with-profile2=yes --with-profile4=yes and then ran make again - same result. Is that the right way to select a profile? On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Marek Safar marek.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm having trouble building today's tarball (20110204). 'mod' fails to build: make[8]: Entering directory `/xxx/home/baileyj/mono-20110204/mcs/tools/mod' MCS [net_4_0] mod.exe error CS0006: Metadata file `./../../class/lib/net_2_0/monodoc.dll' could not be found Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings Could it be related to the new SDK flag? monodoc.dll does not show up under any directory after running make. I don't think it's related, this looks like you are building 4.0 profile only which is not (yet) allowed. Marek ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
I'm having trouble building today's tarball (20110204). 'mod' fails to build: make[8]: Entering directory `/xxx/home/baileyj/mono-20110204/mcs/tools/mod' MCS [net_4_0] mod.exe error CS0006: Metadata file `./../../class/lib/net_2_0/monodoc.dll' could not be found Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings Could it be related to the new SDK flag? monodoc.dll does not show up under any directory after running make. On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Marek Safar marek.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, In the recent weeks I have made several changes to how Mono C# compiler is build and works. With the current master version we no longer use and build System.Reflection based C# compilers (gmcs.exe, smcs.exe, dmcs.exe). The new C# compiler (called mcs.exe) is based on IKVM.Reflection which allows us to build mscorlib independent version of C# compiler. The compiler scripts (gmcs, dmcs) are still working just internally call different program. A new compiler option has been introduced called sdk with 2 values at the moment (2, 4). It allows to build against predefined framework version without manually specifying mscorlib location when compiling directly using mcs compiler. The default value is 4. On top of that mcs.exe is now .net 4 application which means you need to install mono including .net 4.0 support to be able to compile any C# program. All changes apply to mono master only and will be part of the following Mono's release after 2.10. Marek ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
Hello, In the recent weeks I have made several changes to how Mono C# compiler is build and works. With the current master version we no longer use and build System.Reflection based C# compilers (gmcs.exe, smcs.exe, dmcs.exe). The new C# compiler (called mcs.exe) is based on IKVM.Reflection which allows us to build mscorlib independent version of C# compiler. The compiler scripts (gmcs, dmcs) are still working just internally call different program. A new compiler option has been introduced called sdk with 2 values at the moment (2, 4). It allows to build against predefined framework version without manually specifying mscorlib location when compiling directly using mcs compiler. The default value is 4. On top of that mcs.exe is now .net 4 application which means you need to install mono including .net 4.0 support to be able to compile any C# program. All changes apply to mono master only and will be part of the following Mono's release after 2.10. Marek ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
Marek, On 03.02.2011 13:48, Marek Safar wrote: On top of that mcs.exe is now .net 4 application which means you need to install mono including .net 4.0 support to be able to compile any C# program. What's the lowest Mono version that can be used to bootstrap the current git version? Robert ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
Hello, install mono including .net 4.0 support to be able to compile any C# program. What's the lowest Mono version that can be used to bootstrap the current git version? I have not really tested it but Mono 2.4 or newer should work. Marek ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
Hello Marek, A new compiler option has been introduced called sdk with 2 values at the moment (2, 4). It allows to build against predefined framework version without manually specifying mscorlib location when compiling directly using mcs compiler. The default value is 4. Although I mentioned this on IRC, I am not sure if you ever saw it. Is it possible to instead of using a set of preconfigured numbers for the SDK, that we could provide a string, so that: -sdk:STRING Makes mcs look in $prefix/lib/mono/STRING That way we do not hardcode the constant, and we can have different profiles just by building that directory and invoking the compiler with that option. Miguel ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@novell.com wrote: ... Is it possible to instead of using a set of preconfigured numbers for the SDK, that we could provide a string, so that: -sdk:STRING Makes mcs look in $prefix/lib/mono/STRING That way we do not hardcode the constant, and we can have different profiles just by building that directory and invoking the compiler with that option. +1 ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
I think both ways should be supported. If it starts with a number and is a valid constant, use it. (easier for people building interactively in the command line), but for any other pattern try to just concat as suggested (easier for makefiles and to support custom frameworks) Just my two cents, Rafael Monoman Teixeira --- We live in a world operated by science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces. -Carl Sagan On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira rodrigobam...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Miguel de Icaza mig...@novell.com wrote: ... Is it possible to instead of using a set of preconfigured numbers for the SDK, that we could provide a string, so that: -sdk:STRING Makes mcs look in $prefix/lib/mono/STRING That way we do not hardcode the constant, and we can have different profiles just by building that directory and invoking the compiler with that option. +1 ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Recent C# compiler changes
Hello, I think both ways should be supported. If it starts with a number and is a valid constant, use it. (easier for people building interactively in the command line), but for any other pattern try to just concat as suggested (easier for makefiles and to support custom frameworks) Yes, I'll implement it along these lines. Marek ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
