Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Antonello Provenzano-3 wrote: > > Atsushi, > What I wanted to say was that doing a transition from VS.NEt to #D is > a good idea, since they are "comparable"... :D > Our company is working third year exclusively with #D, and since SharpDevelop 2.0 the experience is simply great! It has debugger, great intellisense support (like ctrl+g, alt-insert, alt-space, alt-enter, find-references, find-subclasses, etc.), svn integration, nunit integration, supports Boo (which we happen to use). It's pleasant to work with XML files inside #D, because it has intellisense here too. #D 3.0 now has multi-core project compilation, class diagram pluing, a little-more refactoring options. (P.s. we are developing Desktop apps). -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Windows-IDE--tp9660503p20378456.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Hi, i misunderstood too :-). Sorry for my stupid answer. Have a nice day Radek > Radek, > >> Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of >> policy to attack people talking about SD? > > There has been a *huge* misunderstanding: I was speaking of #D in a > good way, saying it is "comparable" to VS.NET for most of the features > needed by developers, while Atsushi thought I was doing the exact > opposite, so he took the part of #D. > Here we all agree #D is a great product and we encourage its use under > Windows platform. > > Hope this will close this accident. > Antonello > > > On 3/26/07, Radek Polak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of >> policy to attack people talking about SD? >> >> You should check http://icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Features.aspx for >> more information. >> >> Radek >> > I strongly encourage you to not lie. >> > >> > SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. >> > >> > Atsushi Eno >> > >> > Antonello Provenzano wrote: >> > >> >> Peter, >> >> >> >> SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) >> >> comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need >> >> (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). >> >> >> >> Cheers. >> >> Antonello >> >> >> >> >> >> On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell >> me which >> >>> IDE I should use? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> >> >>> Peter >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ___ >> >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> >>> >> >>> >> >> ___ >> >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> >> >> >> >> > >> > ___ >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list >> > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> > >> > >> >> ___ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Nah, what I've originally thought was the quite opposite, as I wrote that it *does* support debugging and refactoring. Atsushi Eno Radek Polak wrote: > Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of > policy to attack people talking about SD? > > You should check http://icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Features.aspx for > more information. > > Radek >> I strongly encourage you to not lie. >> >> SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. >> >> Atsushi Eno >> >> Antonello Provenzano wrote: >> >>> Peter, >>> >>> SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) >>> comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need >>> (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). >>> >>> Cheers. >>> Antonello >>> >>> >>> On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which IDE I should use? Thanks, Peter ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> ___ >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> >> > > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Radek, > Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of > policy to attack people talking about SD? There has been a *huge* misunderstanding: I was speaking of #D in a good way, saying it is "comparable" to VS.NET for most of the features needed by developers, while Atsushi thought I was doing the exact opposite, so he took the part of #D. Here we all agree #D is a great product and we encourage its use under Windows platform. Hope this will close this accident. Antonello On 3/26/07, Radek Polak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of > policy to attack people talking about SD? > > You should check http://icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Features.aspx for > more information. > > Radek > > I strongly encourage you to not lie. > > > > SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. > > > > Atsushi Eno > > > > Antonello Provenzano wrote: > > > >> Peter, > >> > >> SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) > >> comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need > >> (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). > >> > >> Cheers. > >> Antonello > >> > >> > >> On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which > >>> IDE I should use? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Peter > >>> > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >>> > >>> > >> ___ > >> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >> > >> > > > > ___ > > Mono-devel-list mailing list > > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > > > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Lie? Do you have anything against SharpDevelop or is it some kind of policy to attack people talking about SD? You should check http://icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SD/Features.aspx for more information. Radek > I strongly encourage you to not lie. > > SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. > > Atsushi Eno > > Antonello Provenzano wrote: > >> Peter, >> >> SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) >> comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need >> (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). >> >> Cheers. >> Antonello >> >> >> On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which >>> IDE I should use? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> >>> >> ___ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> >> > > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Atsushi, > Oops, I apologize. I misunderstood "comparable" that you meant > SD is not usable. No problems, but I meant the exact opposite: IMHO #D is one of the best IDe for developing Mono and .NET code under Windows. What I wanted to say was that doing a transition from VS.NEt to #D is a good idea, since they are "comparable"... :D Cheers. Antonello On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oops, I apologize. I misunderstood "comparable" that you meant > SD is not usable. > > Atsushi Eno > > Antonello Provenzano wrote: > > Atsushi, > > > >> I strongly encourage you to not lie. > > > > What do you mean? :| > > > > > > > > On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I strongly encourage you to not lie. > >> > >> SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. > >> > >> Atsushi Eno > >> > >> Antonello Provenzano wrote: > >>> Peter, > >>> > >>> SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) > >>> comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need > >>> (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). > >>> > >>> Cheers. > >>> Antonello > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which > IDE I should use? > > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > >>> ___ > >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >>> > >> ___ > >> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >> > > ___ > > Mono-devel-list mailing list > > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Oops, I apologize. I misunderstood "comparable" that you meant SD is not usable. Atsushi Eno Antonello Provenzano wrote: > Atsushi, > >> I strongly encourage you to not lie. > > What do you mean? :| > > > > On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I strongly encourage you to not lie. >> >> SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. >> >> Atsushi Eno >> >> Antonello Provenzano wrote: >>> Peter, >>> >>> SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) >>> comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need >>> (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). >>> >>> Cheers. >>> Antonello >>> >>> >>> On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which IDE I should use? Thanks, Peter ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> ___ >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> >> ___ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Atsushi, > I strongly encourage you to not lie. What do you mean? :| On 3/26/07, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I strongly encourage you to not lie. > > SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. > > Atsushi Eno > > Antonello Provenzano wrote: > > Peter, > > > > SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) > > comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need > > (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). > > > > Cheers. > > Antonello > > > > > > On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which > >> IDE I should use? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Peter > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> Mono-devel-list mailing list > >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >> > > ___ > > Mono-devel-list mailing list > > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
I strongly encourage you to not lie. SharpDevelop does support debugging and refactoring. Atsushi Eno Antonello Provenzano wrote: > Peter, > > SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) > comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need > (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). > > Cheers. > Antonello > > > On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which >> IDE I should use? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peter >> >> >> ___ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Peter, SharpDevelop is by far the best one for Windows: it is (IMHO) comparable with VS.NET for most of the main features a developer need (debugger, code coverage, refactoring, etc.). Cheers. Antonello On 3/25/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which > IDE I should use? > > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Thanks, Paul, I'll try SharpDevelop. Paul wrote: > Hi, > > >> I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which >> IDE I should use? >> > > Try sharpdevel (it's the one MonoDevelop is based on IIRC) > > TTFN > > Paul > > > > ___ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
Hi, > I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which > IDE I should use? Try sharpdevel (it's the one MonoDevelop is based on IIRC) TTFN Paul -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Windows IDE?
I need to start working with mono on Windows. Could anyone tell me which IDE I should use? Thanks, Peter ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
