Re: [Mono-list] Mono.Http.Modules
El mar, 24-02-2004 a las 21:50, Tracy Barlow escribió: > Thanks, > > What functionality does 'Mono.Http.Modules.AcceptEncodingModule' > provide me with? It compresses the response if the browser supports it so it saves some bandwidth at the cost of a few CPU cycles. -Gonzalo ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET App breaks with Mono 0.30
El mié, 25-02-2004 a las 00:50, Tracy Barlow escribió: > >/ System.TypeLoadException: Cannot load type > />/ 'Mono.Http.AcceptEncodingModule, Mono.Http' > / > Remove the references to Mono.Http from web.config or use > 'Mono.Http.Modules.AcceptEncodingModule'. That Type moved to another > namespace. > > What does this Type do? It compresses the response if the browser sends a 'Accept-Encoding: gzip' header. > I was not to the best of my knowlwdge using it before, none of my code > uses the Mono.Http namespace, so why did it work before? It should work now too, but you didn't update web.config from current xsp, so the namespace change is not there. -Gonzalo ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Re: [Mono-devel-list] String::GetHashCode speedup
At 11:03 PM 24/02/2004 -0500, Ben wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>I transformed String.GetHashCode into a managed function. It works
>fairly well, even for somewhat large strings:
[snip]
>So it appears the break-even point here is at ~ 38 chars.
[snip]
I have an idea: why not keep both implementations?
class System.String
{
.
.
public override int GetHashCode()
{
if (Length < 38) // the property can probably be bypassed here
return icall_GetHashCode();
// insert managed implementation
}
.
.
}
Periodically, the break-even point can be tuned. That way, people who use
.GetHashCode on extremely large strings won't have exceptionally slow code
just because they are the minority, but hash tables with short string keys
will still perform well.
While it is true that this would require two independent implementations of
the same hash algorithm to be kept in sync, it would noticeably increase
the performance of both short & long strings.
The same argument applies to the copy operation that was also under
discussion: the icall overhead may be high, but for certain lengths and up,
the speed of the hand-optimized memcpy function outweighs the overhead. If
the string copy operation is going to be called every time someone uses the
instance method String::Append, I can certainly see a lot of cases where
the speed would improve substantially (e.g. people who don't realize that
'char' is not an 8-bit integer type using a System.String as a buffer for
incoming network data -- where have we seen this before? :-).
Jonathan
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
RE: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
If you actually look at /usr/bin/javac, /usr/bin/java, those are soft links to /System/Library/Framework/JavaVM.Framework/Version/1.4.2/Command/java. --> We only have to create soft links for stuff main executables, but not necessary the .exe assemblies since those are just .Net assemblies unless we have some .exe Mono launcher in /etc/... as discussed many times on this list. As for the version: that is the framework version not the assembly version. The GAC is fine and no problem, but Apple is talking about the executables (mono,mint) dynamic libraries (libmono.dylib, ...) and the C-headers, and that has a standard folder structure. - URS C. MUFF -Original Message- From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:43 PM To: Urs C Muff Cc: Andy Satori; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages. Hello, > Well actually I agree that the shell scripts 'mono' and 'mcs' might > live in /usr/bin, but I would create a Framework and put it in > /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework the same way as > /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.Framework is placed (look at the > folder structure within the framework to see how Apple is structuring > such a beast). > > But the .Net assemblies should live in > /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework/Versions/0.30/Assemblies > where there is a link pointing there @ > /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework/Assemblies. > > That would conform with Apple's standard much better: I don't know how > we would have to build mono to include those in the assembly load > path... I think you just build mono with a prefix of: /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework And just copy anything that is installed in the bin/ subdirectory to /usr/bin. As for the versioning: we will be taking care of library versions in a different way (the GAC approach) ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
Urs is correct, after some more digging, it's the 'way' to go. it's going to take me a couple of days to cleanup my own system to get all this built and tested (wish I had another machine for this... oh well). I've got the packages and base installer's built, I just need to run through and tweak them into frameworks. This will also make them much easier to install and manage in the future. Andy On Feb 25, 2004, at 8:21 AM, Urs Muff wrote: If you actually look at /usr/bin/javac, /usr/bin/java, those are soft links to /System/Library/Framework/JavaVM.Framework/Version/1.4.2/Command/java. --> We only have to create soft links for stuff main executables, but not necessary the .exe assemblies since those are just .Net assemblies unless we have some .exe Mono launcher in /etc/... as discussed many times on this list. As for the version: that is the framework version not the assembly version. The GAC is fine and no problem, but Apple is talking about the executables (mono,mint) dynamic libraries (libmono.dylib, ...) and the C-headers, and that has a standard folder structure. - URS C. MUFF -Original Message- From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:43 PM To: Urs C Muff Cc: Andy Satori; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages. Hello, Well actually I agree that the shell scripts 'mono' and 'mcs' might live in /usr/bin, but I would create a Framework and put it in /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework the same way as /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.Framework is placed (look at the folder structure within the framework to see how Apple is structuring such a beast). But the .Net assemblies should live in /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework/Versions/0.30/Assemblies where there is a link pointing there @ /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework/Assemblies. That would conform with Apple's standard much better: I don't know how we would have to build mono to include those in the assembly load path... I think you just build mono with a prefix of: /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework And just copy anything that is installed in the bin/ subdirectory to /usr/bin. As for the versioning: we will be taking care of library versions in a different way (the GAC approach) ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
RE: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
This is great! Please publish the Xcode projects and scripts you use to make the package and framework so others can build it from CVS. Miguel or myself will check them into CVS in case you don't have access. - Urs -Original Message- From: Andy Satori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 7:21 AM To: Urs Muff Cc: 'Miguel de Icaza'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages. Urs is correct, after some more digging, it's the 'way' to go. it's going to take me a couple of days to cleanup my own system to get all this built and tested (wish I had another machine for this... oh well). I've got the packages and base installer's built, I just need to run through and tweak them into frameworks. This will also make them much easier to install and manage in the future. Andy On Feb 25, 2004, at 8:21 AM, Urs Muff wrote: > If you actually look at /usr/bin/javac, /usr/bin/java, those are soft > links > to > /System/Library/Framework/JavaVM.Framework/Version/1.4.2/Command/java. > > --> We only have to create soft links for stuff main executables, but > not > necessary the .exe assemblies since those are just .Net assemblies > unless we > have some .exe Mono launcher in /etc/... as discussed many times on > this > list. > > As for the version: that is the framework version not the assembly > version. > The GAC is fine and no problem, but Apple is talking about the > executables > (mono,mint) dynamic libraries (libmono.dylib, ...) and the C-headers, > and > that has a standard folder structure. > > - URS C. MUFF > > -Original Message- > From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:43 PM > To: Urs C Muff > Cc: Andy Satori; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages. > > Hello, > >> Well actually I agree that the shell scripts 'mono' and 'mcs' might >> live in /usr/bin, but I would create a Framework and put it in >> /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework the same way as >> /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.Framework is placed (look at the >> folder structure within the framework to see how Apple is structuring >> such a beast). >> >> But the .Net assemblies should live in >> /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework/Versions/0.30/Assemblies >> where there is a link pointing there @ >> /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework/Assemblies. >> >> That would conform with Apple's standard much better: I don't know how >> we would have to build mono to include those in the assembly load >> path... > > I think you just build mono with a prefix of: > > /System/Library/Frameworks/MonoVM.Framework > > And just copy anything that is installed in the bin/ subdirectory to > /usr/bin. > > As for the versioning: we will be taking care of library versions in a > different way (the GAC approach) > ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] will MONO support .NET applets ?
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 08:35, Goodman, Gareth wrote: > Hi > > I've been experimenting with .NET applets using c#, deployed on XP. > I've been keeping > an eye on MONO's progress to date as it looks like the answer to many > problems, and > I would like to know if (for example) a MONO-enabled Linux machine > will be capable of > running .NET applets inside a browser on that machine. Not currently, because such feature have high demands on the security area: Specially it needs to have a full implementation of CAS (Code Acess Security) working, and we are just starting to implement it (Sebastien correct me if needed please). Nobody should give .NET Applets all the powers of a local application, or it would be a feast for worms and trojan-horses writers. When you factor in all the limitations you have to impose in such applets because of security concerns, their usefullness for some enticing scenarios become nearly zero. > please say yes :) Sorry, not yet... Also someone have to build a plugin for the browsers to recognize the mime-type plus specific headers in the exes, and them make a container for managed content. This plugin would start/embed mono. Also .NET Applets are normally WinForms-based so as our WinForms implementation is also incomplete, probably even if the other cited pieces were in place you couldn't have it working. Some things just take more time to implement and mature. Care to help us into making it possible earlier than later... > Regards, > > Gareth Goodman > English Heritage UK Best regards, -- Rafael "Monoman" Teixeira Mono Hacker since 16 Jul 2001 - http://www.go-mono.org/ Mono Brasil Founding Member - http://monobrasil.redesolbrasil.org/ English Blog: http://monoblog.blogspot.com/ Brazilian Portuguese Blog: http://monoblog.weblogger.terra.com.br/ ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
What about GTK# ? Is that Mono built with ICU, Andy ? What are you doing with XCode ? Erik ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Npgsql encoding problems with 0.6rc1 fixed in cvs
Hi all, In order to add Unicode encoding support, 0.6rc1 added a little bug when handling non Unicode encodings. Now this is fixed in cvs. Please, grab the latest cvs code with the fix and give it a try. Let me know of any problems you get. A new release will come shortly with this fix. -- Regards, Francisco Figueiredo Jr. Membro Fundador do Projeto MonoBrasil - MonoBrasil Project Founder Member - "Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." ~ Albert Einstein ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
At this point, I'm packaging GTK#, XSP and MOD_MONO as seperate packages. On the ICU (and GC) front, I currently build without either, but once I get all the foundation in place, I'll add them. With XCode, I currently have a C# language filter defined so that XCode can parse the functions and color C# files. I also have a Makefile based project template for building a C# application in XCode. I'm now working on enhancing that to be a part of the XCode native build system, instead of the old Project Builder, jam based, build system. This will improve the error parsing and display, as well as allow you to use the much more powerful Info panels in XCode to set up your build environments. After that, it is my intent to build a library of templates for XCode to setup your basic projects, much like VS.NET. Hopefully by that time, Apple will have updated XCode to make it easier to integrate external debuggers into XCode, and I'll be able to add that. Andy On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Erik Dasque wrote: What about GTK# ? Is that Mono built with ICU, Andy ? What are you doing with XCode ? Erik ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
Andy, The xcode stuff sounds great. Are you packaging 0.30.2 or a cvs build ? I don't believe the ppc fix is in the releases yet. I have found that many applications crash (Bus error) without it thus far (including a lot of GTK# apps). Do you use the interpreter only ? Also, I believe ICU is needed to run monodevelop, wink, wink. Erik On Feb 25, 2004, at 11:27 AM, Andy Satori wrote: At this point, I'm packaging GTK#, XSP and MOD_MONO as seperate packages. On the ICU (and GC) front, I currently build without either, but once I get all the foundation in place, I'll add them. With XCode, I currently have a C# language filter defined so that XCode can parse the functions and color C# files. I also have a Makefile based project template for building a C# application in XCode. I'm now working on enhancing that to be a part of the XCode native build system, instead of the old Project Builder, jam based, build system. This will improve the error parsing and display, as well as allow you to use the much more powerful Info panels in XCode to set up your build environments. After that, it is my intent to build a library of templates for XCode to setup your basic projects, much like VS.NET. Hopefully by that time, Apple will have updated XCode to make it easier to integrate external debuggers into XCode, and I'll be able to add that. Andy On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Erik Dasque wrote: What about GTK# ? Is that Mono built with ICU, Andy ? What are you doing with XCode ? Erik ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages - GTK#.
This is a little offtopic, but since you mention GTK# I tried to compile GTK# early this week and the compilation through an exception and since mcs doesn't support exception handling yet, the process crashed. Are you doing anything special to compile GTK#? On Feb 25, 2004, at 12:27 PM, Andy Satori wrote: At this point, I'm packaging GTK#, XSP and MOD_MONO as seperate packages. On the ICU (and GC) front, I currently build without either, but once I get all the foundation in place, I'll add them. With XCode, I currently have a C# language filter defined so that XCode can parse the functions and color C# files. I also have a Makefile based project template for building a C# application in XCode. I'm now working on enhancing that to be a part of the XCode native build system, instead of the old Project Builder, jam based, build system. This will improve the error parsing and display, as well as allow you to use the much more powerful Info panels in XCode to set up your build environments. After that, it is my intent to build a library of templates for XCode to setup your basic projects, much like VS.NET. Hopefully by that time, Apple will have updated XCode to make it easier to integrate external debuggers into XCode, and I'll be able to add that. Andy On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Erik Dasque wrote: What about GTK# ? Is that Mono built with ICU, Andy ? What are you doing with XCode ? Erik ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list Elfred Pagán ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages.
At the moment, my primary installation is a CVS build. I did all the dependancy work and checks on a clean OS X install (gotta love firewire external drives) and it's using 0.30.2, as it's a quicker and easier build process on a virgin machine. Once I have the basics established, I'll bring it all up to date, including updating to the newly releasesd GLib 2.3.3. Andy On Feb 25, 2004, at 11:37 AM, Erik Dasque wrote: Andy, The xcode stuff sounds great. Are you packaging 0.30.2 or a cvs build ? I don't believe the ppc fix is in the releases yet. I have found that many applications crash (Bus error) without it thus far (including a lot of GTK# apps). Do you use the interpreter only ? Also, I believe ICU is needed to run monodevelop, wink, wink. Erik ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] MacOS packages - GTK#.
I replaced all references to mono to point to mint in the makefiles. If you're using 0.30.x, you probably don't have the ppc fix and mcs.exe (running with mono, the JIT) as well as other .exe processes (gapi comes to mind) will die. Erik On Feb 25, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Elfred Pagán wrote: This is a little offtopic, but since you mention GTK# I tried to compile GTK# early this week and the compilation through an exception and since mcs doesn't support exception handling yet, the process crashed. Are you doing anything special to compile GTK#? On Feb 25, 2004, at 12:27 PM, Andy Satori wrote: At this point, I'm packaging GTK#, XSP and MOD_MONO as seperate packages. On the ICU (and GC) front, I currently build without either, but once I get all the foundation in place, I'll add them. With XCode, I currently have a C# language filter defined so that XCode can parse the functions and color C# files. I also have a Makefile based project template for building a C# application in XCode. I'm now working on enhancing that to be a part of the XCode native build system, instead of the old Project Builder, jam based, build system. This will improve the error parsing and display, as well as allow you to use the much more powerful Info panels in XCode to set up your build environments. After that, it is my intent to build a library of templates for XCode to setup your basic projects, much like VS.NET. Hopefully by that time, Apple will have updated XCode to make it easier to integrate external debuggers into XCode, and I'll be able to add that. Andy On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Erik Dasque wrote: What about GTK# ? Is that Mono built with ICU, Andy ? What are you doing with XCode ? Erik ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list Elfred Pagán ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] monodoc advice
Hello, I'm using monodoc to build some docs for a project and had a few questions. First monodoc has been integrated into our build system, integration was easy and the docs look great. Once the docs are built (make doc) they're exported to the sources directory where they can be viewed with the browser. I want to be able to sync any docs generated from future code changes, and documentation written through the browser. Do I have to do anything special here to prevent anything from being lost? Second, I'm getting errors in the browser when viewing my name spaces. The classes view with the "Type" and "Summary" headings show up fine with the Type field populated with my class names and the Summary field containing the "to be added" tag and "An error occured while loading type information: File "My.Namespace" not found. I'm not really sure where to start tracking this one down. Any help would be great. Thanks, - Phil ps Monodoc is one of the most useful tools yet, it's getting me out of writing A LOT of documentation for my senior design project. Less writing is good. ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Re: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X
>> From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:12:22 -0500 >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X >> >> I know this is a bit on the experimental side but I just grabbed the latest >> mono 0.30.1 and ikvm. I tried to run Hello.class (the function should be >> obvious) and I get a bus error (-v -v -v output attached). I can run the >> same code written in C#. Any suggestions, thoughts, comments? >> >> (Sorry for the cross post but I bet its about equally PPC mono it related as >> IKVM) >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Andrew C. Oliver >> http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp >> Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI >> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/poi >> For Java and Excel, Got POI? >> >> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost >> definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its >> general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with >> everything espoused in the above email. >> >> foo2 Description: Binary data
Re: [Mono-list] Re: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X
Did you try using mint instead of mono to run this ? 0.30.x on PPC has a bug which appears very quickly when you use mono (the JIT) and less frequently with the interpreter. Erik On Feb 25, 2004, at 2:50 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:12:22 -0500 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X I know this is a bit on the experimental side but I just grabbed the latest mono 0.30.1 and ikvm. I tried to run Hello.class (the function should be obvious) and I get a bus error (-v -v -v output attached). I can run the same code written in C#. Any suggestions, thoughts, comments? (Sorry for the cross post but I bet its about equally PPC mono it related as IKVM) Thanks, -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] monodoc advice
Philip wrote: Second, I'm getting errors in the browser when viewing my name spaces. (. . .) containing the "to be added" tag and "An error occured while loading type information: File "My.Namespace" not found. Monodoc loads up the classes at run time to make sure that the documentation being viewed for a class matches what's actually defined in the class. e.g. If a member hasn't been implemented but there's documentation for it, Monodoc says so so that the developer knows not to use the method. (I imagine this will disappear at some point.) If Monodoc can't find the assembly to load (because it's not in MONO_PATH), it'll show that message. -- - Joshua Tauberer http://taubz.for.net ** Nothing Unreal Exists ** ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] [ANNOUNCE] Kurush Personal Finance Tool 0.5
Hi, I have released a new version of my personal finance tool called "Kurush". It is developed with Mono and Gtk# and requires Gnome Desktop 2 The source code, binary and screenshots can be found at: http://www.ercansoy.com/kurush/ Hope, people will find it useful. Ecmel Ercan ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
RE: [Mono-list] [ANNOUNCE] Kurush Personal Finance Tool 0.5
Hi, Very Nice! I was wanting to do something like that. I wanted a program like gnuCash, but I was disappointed to not find a Windows port. Now, I don't have to create one - I can just use yours. BTW, does it use pure gtk#, or does it require other stuff such as GNOME#? I was wanting to use this on Windows. Thanks, Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ecmel Ercan Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 6:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mono-list] [ANNOUNCE] Kurush Personal Finance Tool 0.5 Hi, I have released a new version of my personal finance tool called "Kurush". It is developed with Mono and Gtk# and requires Gnome Desktop 2 The source code, binary and screenshots can be found at: http://www.ercansoy.com/kurush/ Hope, people will find it useful. Ecmel Ercan ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Most recent snapshot and Mac OS X
I tried compiling the latest mono snapshot and I got the following error message when I did a configure: config.status: error: cannot find input file: mono/arch/amd64/Makefile.in ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Compiling egg-chicken libraries
shouldn't you avoid such situations in the first place ? Isn't this a design issue, more than a compilation issue ? On Tuesday 24 February 2004 05:16, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: > I've had similar problem and looks like there's no general-purpose > solution. > > I deal with it by creating a stub version of one library, compiling the > other library against it and then recompiling the first library against > just built second library. > > The stub contains nothing but public API of the library that's used by the > second library. > > Jarek > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Tsachev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 2:03 PM > Subject: [Mono-list] Compiling egg-chicken libraries > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > I have some code that compiles in Visual Studio but I didn't have much luck > trying to compile it with mono. The problem is that I have lib1 and lib2 > and each instantiates an object with a class definition in the other > library. > > I found in the archive that I can compile the libraries with mcs /t:library > lib1.cs -r... I get this error > > lib1.cs (line) error CS0246: Cannot find type 'lib2.foo' > > The same happens if I try to compile lib2. I tried with -r:lib1.cs but it > didn't quite like it. > > Also is there a way that I can automate the whole compiling process, maybe > if > not direct I can dig into Makefiles and write one? > > - -- > Martin Tsachev > http://martin.f2o.org > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAO0unypytlz9Py3wRAk3sAJ9W3Y1MUASk2LwTGursdJIBl+7E3ACgqBYG > kr5zz7Bl41qjloGHqJ/ncwU= > =EaFM > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > ___ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Compiling egg-chicken libraries
Hello, The problem is that there are some dependencies built into the public api of the class libraries that we can't redesign because it would break binary compat with assemblies built on the Microsoft runtime. Honestly, if I had been designing it, I would not have built in the dependency. -- Ben On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 22:35, max wrote: > shouldn't you avoid such situations in the first place ? > Isn't this a design issue, more than a compilation issue ? > > On Tuesday 24 February 2004 05:16, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: > > I've had similar problem and looks like there's no general-purpose > > solution. > > > > I deal with it by creating a stub version of one library, compiling the > > other library against it and then recompiling the first library against > > just built second library. > > > > The stub contains nothing but public API of the library that's used by the > > second library. > > > > Jarek > > - Original Message - > > From: "Martin Tsachev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 2:03 PM > > Subject: [Mono-list] Compiling egg-chicken libraries > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello, > > > > I have some code that compiles in Visual Studio but I didn't have much luck > > trying to compile it with mono. The problem is that I have lib1 and lib2 > > and each instantiates an object with a class definition in the other > > library. > > > > I found in the archive that I can compile the libraries with mcs /t:library > > lib1.cs -r... I get this error > > > > lib1.cs (line) error CS0246: Cannot find type 'lib2.foo' > > > > The same happens if I try to compile lib2. I tried with -r:lib1.cs but it > > didn't quite like it. > > > > Also is there a way that I can automate the whole compiling process, maybe > > if > > not direct I can dig into Makefiles and write one? > > > > - -- > > Martin Tsachev > > http://martin.f2o.org > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQFAO0unypytlz9Py3wRAk3sAJ9W3Y1MUASk2LwTGursdJIBl+7E3ACgqBYG > > kr5zz7Bl41qjloGHqJ/ncwU= > > =EaFM > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > ___ > > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > ___ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Compiling egg-chicken libraries
I need (as an option) this for my O/R mapping software because I want to be able to use mutliple languages. I have: 1. "Stubs" assembly - written in C# - that must be able to create objects from "Objects" assembly to represent 1-1 relations and 1-N relations. 2. "Objects" assembly - written in some other language whose classes inherit from the appropriate classes in "Stubs" assembly So I have a mutual dependency here. But as I've said this is optional. If you stict to C# you have just a single assembly with no interdependencies. Jarek - Original Message - From: "max" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 4:35 AM Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Compiling egg-chicken libraries > shouldn't you avoid such situations in the first place ? > Isn't this a design issue, more than a compilation issue ? > > On Tuesday 24 February 2004 05:16, Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: > > I've had similar problem and looks like there's no general-purpose > > solution. > > > > I deal with it by creating a stub version of one library, compiling the > > other library against it and then recompiling the first library against > > just built second library. > > > > The stub contains nothing but public API of the library that's used by the > > second library. > > > > Jarek > > - Original Message - > > From: "Martin Tsachev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 2:03 PM > > Subject: [Mono-list] Compiling egg-chicken libraries > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello, > > > > I have some code that compiles in Visual Studio but I didn't have much luck > > trying to compile it with mono. The problem is that I have lib1 and lib2 > > and each instantiates an object with a class definition in the other > > library. > > > > I found in the archive that I can compile the libraries with mcs /t:library > > lib1.cs -r... I get this error > > > > lib1.cs (line) error CS0246: Cannot find type 'lib2.foo' > > > > The same happens if I try to compile lib2. I tried with -r:lib1.cs but it > > didn't quite like it. > > > > Also is there a way that I can automate the whole compiling process, maybe > > if > > not direct I can dig into Makefiles and write one? > > > > - -- > > Martin Tsachev > > http://martin.f2o.org > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQFAO0unypytlz9Py3wRAk3sAJ9W3Y1MUASk2LwTGursdJIBl+7E3ACgqBYG > > kr5zz7Bl41qjloGHqJ/ncwU= > > =EaFM > > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > > > ___ > > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > ___ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
