Re: [Mono-dev] DistCC and cross-compiling Mono
boj...@brandeis.edu wrote: I patched this to pass on CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to the mcs makefile, so now jay builds correctly when cross-compiling with distcc. The patch is attached, and it's sort of a hack. It passes compilation, though it spews out full screens of warnings because of all the warning flags that are passed along to jay because they're passed to mono. If anyone has a better solution to this issue, it'd be great to see it implemented. Since jay is only used on the host, compiling it for the target is simply wrong. Imagine you're cross compiling for ARM: what is an arm-jay good for other than breaking the build on the host? Robert ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Architectural decisions behind mod_mono
Hi all - I'm investigating the possibility of porting a site from .NET/Windows Server to Apache/Mono and am doing some homework about running Mono applications on the web. As it stands, it seems the two choices are XSP, which is designed to be a test/debug server and not for highly scalable production applications, or mod_mono which is a module that is compiled into Apache. From what I understand, mod_mono requires mod_mono_server which answers inbound requests over a TCP/IP socket. I'm having a hard time understanding this design. First off, for every inbound socket opened in Apache, a new socket is opened for mod_mono_server, along with all the overhead on the network stack. In the Windows world, IIS hosts the CLR in process and the two are very tightly integrated. What's stopping Mono from incorporating this design? I'm assuming Java does not have a separate Java server which Apache forwards requests to. Can't Apache just be configured to natively run Mono applications in process? Would this be a massive architectural change to the Mono runtime? As it stands right now, I don't see a possibility for any MySpace/Facebook level web applications running on Mono because I simply can't see mod_mono being able to scale to that level. Perhaps some of the hard core Mono runtime guys can comment, I'm sure they're 843x smarter than I am and there's very good reasons why mod_mono was designed the way it is, but I'm wondering how this compares with PHP, Java, etc which all seem to be tightly integrated in with Apache. Are there any plans to incorporate the Mono runtime directly into Apache, or maybe write a highly performant Mono server similar to Sun's Java Web Server? I'm not trying to criticize any design decisions, I'm very new to Mono and UNIX server architecture and am just trying to understand the reasons behind this. Thanks!! Mike -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Architectural-decisions-behind-mod_mono-tp22385591p22385591.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Architectural decisions behind mod_mono
Hiawatha wrote: Hi all - I'm investigating the possibility of porting a site from Apache. From what I understand, mod_mono requires mod_mono_server which answers inbound requests over a TCP/IP socket. I'm having a hard time Mod_mono + mod-mono-server are using unix sockets by default. This is the default IPC machinery under Unix. The TCP option is only useful if mod_mono and mod-mono-server are hosted on different machines. understanding this design. First off, for every inbound socket opened in Apache, a new socket is opened for mod_mono_server, along with all the overhead on the network stack. In the Windows world, IIS hosts the CLR in process and the two are very tightly integrated. What's stopping Mono from incorporating this design? IIS + MS ASP.NET are communicating using named pipes, the default IPC machinery for Windows. Do you see the parallels? I'm assuming Java does not have a separate Java server which Apache forwards requests to. You're wrong. Tomcat, the most employed servlet container, is running in its own process. Can't Apache just be configured to natively run Mono applications in process? Would this be a massive architectural change to the Mono runtime? It's almost impossible because ASP.NET was not designed to be hosted inside a short living process. Robert ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Architectural decisions behind mod_mono
Hiawatha wrote: Hi all - I'm investigating the possibility of porting a site from .NET/Windows Server to Apache/Mono and am doing some homework about running Mono applications on the web. As it stands, it seems the two choices are XSP, which is designed to be a test/debug server and not for highly scalable production applications, or mod_mono which is a module that is compiled into Apache. From what I understand, mod_mono requires mod_mono_server which answers inbound requests over a TCP/IP socket. I'm having a hard time understanding this design. First off, for every inbound socket opened in It's how you get the job done. The alternative is shared memory. And that's not fun. Apache, a new socket is opened for mod_mono_server, along with all the overhead on the network stack. In the Windows world, IIS hosts the CLR in process and the two are very tightly integrated. What's stopping Mono from incorporating this design? I'm assuming Java does not have a separate Java server which Apache forwards requests to. It does. It actually has numerous choices in this department. You can front Tomcat with Apache, and many many people do. Can't Apache just be configured to natively run Mono applications in process? Would this be a massive architectural change to the Mono runtime? As it stands right now, I don't see a possibility for any MySpace/Facebook level web applications running on Mono because I simply can't see mod_mono being able to scale to that level. Would probably be possible would would step all over Apache's threading. Perhaps some of the hard core Mono runtime guys can comment, I'm sure they're 843x smarter than I am and there's very good reasons why mod_mono was designed the way it is, but I'm wondering how this compares with PHP, Java, etc which all seem to be tightly integrated in with Apache. Are there any plans to incorporate the Mono runtime directly into Apache, or maybe write a highly performant Mono server similar to Sun's Java Web Server? I'm not trying to criticize any design decisions, I'm very new to Mono and UNIX server architecture and am just trying to understand the reasons behind this. Thanks!! Because the Apache guys have no incentive to hard code or go out of their way in Apache to work with Mono like the IIS guys do for the CLR. And it's better this way. Mike ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] DistCC and cross-compiling Mono
Robert Jordan wrote: Since jay is only used on the host, compiling it for the target is simply wrong. Imagine you're cross compiling for ARM: what is an arm-jay good for other than breaking the build on the host? Robert ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list So I take it that there's not really a solution here--it'd be nice to be able to compile all parts of Mono in a distributed manner, but it sounds like it'd just break jay when cross-compiling. Is there a potential solution to the problem then, other than interrupting the build process, building jay without distcc, and then continuing the build (I believe jay is the last piece of C code to be compiled, so distcc doesn't even matter afterwards)? --Bojan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] DistCC and cross-compiling Mono
Am 08.03.2009 um 18:53 schrieb Bojan Rajkovic: Robert Jordan wrote: Since jay is only used on the host, compiling it for the target is simply wrong. Imagine you're cross compiling for ARM: what is an arm-jay good for other than breaking the build on the host? Robert ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list So I take it that there's not really a solution here--it'd be nice to be able to compile all parts of Mono in a distributed manner, but it sounds like it'd just break jay when cross-compiling. Is there a potential solution to the problem then, other than interrupting the build process, building jay without distcc, and then continuing the build (I believe jay is the last piece of C code to be compiled, so distcc doesn't even matter afterwards)? There is, you should configure with --disable-mcs-build when cross- compiling. Just copy over mcs and libraries from a standard build on your host. Jay is a build tool, it's not needed at runtime on the target system. Andreas ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] DistCC and cross-compiling Mono
Andreas Färber wrote: There is, you should configure with --disable-mcs-build when cross-compiling. Just copy over mcs and libraries from a standard build on your host. Jay is a build tool, it's not needed at runtime on the target system. Andreas Passing --disable-mcs-build would pretty much accomplish what I described in my last post--I'd have to do the build in two phases anyway, remembering to pass CC=gcc and not CC=distcc when doing the mcs build. I'll just do things that way from now on--I didn't know about that flag (I must've missed it when I was perusing configure.in). --Bojan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Architectural decisions behind mod_mono
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Hiawatha ima...@comcast.net wrote: Hi all - I'm investigating the possibility of porting a site from .NET/Windows Server to Apache/Mono and am doing some homework about running Mono applications on the web. As it stands, it seems the two choices are XSP, which is designed to be a test/debug server and not for highly scalable production applications, or mod_mono which is a module that is compiled into Apache. From what I understand, mod_mono requires mod_mono_server which answers inbound requests over a TCP/IP socket. I'm having a hard time understanding this design. First off, for every inbound socket opened in Apache, a new socket is opened for mod_mono_server, along with all the overhead on the network stack. In the Windows world, IIS hosts the CLR in process and the two are very tightly integrated. What's stopping Mono from incorporating this design? The main issue is the lack of reliability on such solution. I'm assuming Java does not have a separate Java server which Apache forwards requests to. You're wrong. All java web application are hosted on separate processes, this is true for all major containers (tomcat, jetty, webfear and so on). Can't Apache just be configured to natively run Mono applications in process? Would this be a massive architectural change to the Mono runtime? As it stands right now, I don't see a possibility for any MySpace/Facebook level web applications running on Mono because I simply can't see mod_mono being able to scale to that level. This is a minor issue that should pose no scalability issues on itself. Perhaps some of the hard core Mono runtime guys can comment, I'm sure they're 843x smarter than I am and there's very good reasons why mod_mono was designed the way it is, but I'm wondering how this compares with PHP, Java, etc which all seem to be tightly integrated in with Apache. Are there any plans to incorporate the Mono runtime directly into Apache, or maybe write a highly performant Mono server similar to Sun's Java Web Server? I'm not trying to criticize any design decisions, I'm very new to Mono and UNIX server architecture and am just trying to understand the reasons behind this. Thanks!! The cost of doing local IPC, be it with unix sockets or tcp/ip, is minimal. The cost in terms of reliability is, on the other hand, big. This is a very common setup, it's the recommended way with Java, Ruby and Python, at least. The advantage is that the target running the application can crash without making the whole machine unavailable. The other is that it's easier to periodically restart the back-end to be sure things like memory leaks don't bring the machine down. In the end, it's a choice that gives a very small performance penalty in trade of a huge reliability gain. It's much better this way and I don't see any compelling reason to move to a worse configuration. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Architectural decisions behind mod_mono
Wow these are all really great replies! Thanks for the info. I think I was under the idea it was using TCP/IP sockets to communicate between processes and that was making me scratch my head. I'm kinda curious as to why Mono hasn't really caught on as a web platform, as far as performance it should blow the doors off PHP stuff right? My only guess is it's kinda from the Microsoft world and there's a lot of anti-MS Unix people out there. The .NET fans are probably gonna just stick with Windows. I'm working on a new site and am very interested in cloud server solutions, but most of the cloud providers like Mosso and Slicehost are UNIX based, plus the idea of being able to cheaply deploy new servers (or virtual machines) with no software cost is very attractive. Thanks for clearing this up! Mike -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Architectural-decisions-behind-mod_mono-tp22385591p22404800.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-list] ASP.NET Checking if File Exists Error / 404 on Rewrite
Hello! Have you found the solution for http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/2007-August/036106.html May you share it, please! Thanks. Shauki ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] GTK-Sharp Problems
I've played around a little with monodevelop and tried downloading and installing the mono 2.2 which worked fine. But then i noticed that i couldnt start [url=http://banshee-project.org/]Banshee[/url], a mono based multi media player, any more. I get lots of text in a terminal but the most interesting part seems to be: --- ** (/usr/lib/banshee-1/Banshee.exe:5162): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from /usr/lib/banshee-1/Banshee.Services.dll could not be loaded: Assembly: glib-sharp(assemblyref_index=9) Version:2.12.0.0 Public Key: 35e10195dab3c99f The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/usr/lib/banshee-1/). I tried to create a new monodevelop Gtk+ app. Building it works fine but whenever i try to start it i get the following error: --- Assembly: glib-sharp(assemblyref_index=0) Version:2.12.0.0 Public Key: 35e10195dab3c99f The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/home/b0wter/Documents/Projects/bCountdown/bCountdown/bin/Debug/). --- I tried to install Gtk Sharp 2.12 manually, which seemed to work fine, i didnt get any errors (but i missed the optional dependancies cairo mono and another one i dont remember). So i tried to figure out if glib-sharp is installed correctly: b0w...@bowterpad:~$ gacutil -l | grep glib glib-sharp, Version=2.12.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.10.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.4.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.6.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.8.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f that looks like it should work!? Now i dont know what to do to get this working again :( Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GTK-Sharp-Problems-tp22381859p22381859.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Array.BinarySearch IComparable in Mono vs .NET
Hello, I was wondering if there were any plans to fix the apparent incompatibility between how Array.BinarySearch uses IComparable in MONO vs .NET? Sorry it is beyond my skills to look at the source but definitely exists. See http://www.aspose.com/community/forums/permalink/152278/158215/showthread.aspx#158215 This is all that is preventing me from switching an entire ASP.NET site from MS to Mono+Linux! Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Array.BinarySearch-IComparable-in-Mono-vs-.NET-tp22386963p22386963.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Array.BinarySearch IComparable in Mono vs .NET
anttwo wrote: Hello, I was wondering if there were any plans to fix the apparent incompatibility between how Array.BinarySearch uses IComparable in MONO vs .NET? Sorry it is beyond my skills to look at the source but definitely exists. Do you have a test case? Have you filed a bug? Robert ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] GTK-Sharp Problems
Hi, Your best bet would be to undo everything you've done to install mono/monodevelop/gtk-sharp and then install the versions supplied in your package manager instead. You have a broken install and I couldn't even begin to offer any sort of hints on how to fix it unless i knew exactly what was on your system before and exactly what you did to 'download and install mono manually'. Alan. On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:45 PM, b0wter evil-klabauterm...@gmx.de wrote: I've played around a little with monodevelop and tried downloading and installing the mono 2.2 which worked fine. But then i noticed that i couldnt start [url=http://banshee-project.org/]Banshee[/urlhttp://banshee-project.org/%5DBanshee%5B/url], a mono based multi media player, any more. I get lots of text in a terminal but the most interesting part seems to be: --- ** (/usr/lib/banshee-1/Banshee.exe:5162): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from /usr/lib/banshee-1/Banshee.Services.dll could not be loaded: Assembly: glib-sharp(assemblyref_index=9) Version:2.12.0.0 Public Key: 35e10195dab3c99f The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/usr/lib/banshee-1/). I tried to create a new monodevelop Gtk+ app. Building it works fine but whenever i try to start it i get the following error: --- Assembly: glib-sharp(assemblyref_index=0) Version:2.12.0.0 Public Key: 35e10195dab3c99f The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly (/home/b0wter/Documents/Projects/bCountdown/bCountdown/bin/Debug/). --- I tried to install Gtk Sharp 2.12 manually, which seemed to work fine, i didnt get any errors (but i missed the optional dependancies cairo mono and another one i dont remember). So i tried to figure out if glib-sharp is installed correctly: b0w...@bowterpad:~$ gacutil -l | grep glib glib-sharp, Version=2.12.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.10.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.4.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.6.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f policy.2.8.glib-sharp, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=35e10195dab3c99f that looks like it should work!? Now i dont know what to do to get this working again :( Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GTK-Sharp-Problems-tp22381859p22381859.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Array.BinarySearch IComparable in Mono vs .NET
Hey, Sorry it is beyond my skills to look at the source but definitely exists. All we need is an example of the code that's breaking and a description of what you expect to happen as compared to what is actually happening. Alan See http://www.aspose.com/community/forums/permalink/152278/158215/showthread.aspx#158215 This is all that is preventing me from switching an entire ASP.NET site from MS to Mono+Linux! Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Array.BinarySearch-IComparable-in-Mono-vs-.NET-tp22386963p22386963.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] ASP.NET Checking if File Exists Error / 404 on Rewrite
Shauki Bagdadi wrote:
Hello!
Have you found the solution for
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/2007-August/036106.html
May you share it, please!
Thanks.
You can either use an apache rewrite rule (if you're using
apache, of course):
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/rewrite/rewrite_guide.html
Or hook HttpApplication's
BeginRequest to route the request to another file:
global.asax:
protected void Application_BeginRequest (object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// map inexistent files to bar.aspx
if (!File.Exists (Request.PhysicalPath))
Context.RewritePath (/appname/bar.aspx);
}
or this
protected void Application_BeginRequest (object sender, EventArgs e)
{
map foo.aspx to bar.aspx.
if (Request.FilePath == /appname/foo.aspx)
Context.RewritePath (/appname/bar.aspx);
}
Robert
___
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Best OS dist to use?
Am 06.03.2009 um 21:31 schrieb Jiří Zárevúcký: 2009/3/6 eschnei...@schneidersoft.com eschnei...@schneidersoft.com: I do understand. If MS can make all/most of it's Operating Systems work there they should be able to... Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you are suggesting that Linux developer should make it work in VPC. Probably because I seriously doubt MS has any interest in making latest Linux work there properly. :) Well, they did make a deal with this company called Novell to collaborate on virtualization technology, if I'm not mistaken. ;) But hey, it's called Virtual PC 2007, so we can't expect it to run 2009 software. For that we have to wait for the next big release, buy a Windows upgrade and then upgrade our hardware to make it run as fast as before. That's their interest. :) Andreas ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Best OS dist to use?
2009/3/8 Andreas Färber andreas.faer...@web.de: Am 06.03.2009 um 21:31 schrieb Jiří Zárevúcký: 2009/3/6 eschnei...@schneidersoft.com eschnei...@schneidersoft.com: I do understand. If MS can make all/most of it's Operating Systems work there they should be able to... Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you are suggesting that Linux developer should make it work in VPC. Probably because I seriously doubt MS has any interest in making latest Linux work there properly. :) Well, they did make a deal with this company called Novell to collaborate on virtualization technology, if I'm not mistaken. ;) But hey, it's called Virtual PC 2007, so we can't expect it to run 2009 software. For that we have to wait for the next big release, buy a Windows upgrade and then upgrade our hardware to make it run as fast as before. That's their interest. :) Andreas Yeah... I guess you are right :) ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] GTK-Sharp Problems
Hi, thats what i tryed before i posted here. Sorry that i missed to mention that. But i dont know what to do for an all new clean installation. I guessed i have missed some steps the last time i tried (I just used my packet manger to remove all packages that i found searching for mono and having to do something with the framework). Johannes Alan McGovern-2 wrote: Hi, Your best bet would be to undo everything you've done to install mono/monodevelop/gtk-sharp and then install the versions supplied in your package manager instead. You have a broken install and I couldn't even begin to offer any sort of hints on how to fix it unless i knew exactly what was on your system before and exactly what you did to 'download and install mono manually'. Alan. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GTK-Sharp-Problems-tp22381859p22402201.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Best OS dist to use?
Virtualbox? On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Färber andreas.faer...@web.dewrote: Am 08.03.2009 um 19:34 schrieb Jiří Zárevúcký: 2009/3/8 Andreas Färber andreas.faer...@web.de: Am 06.03.2009 um 21:31 schrieb Jiří Zárevúcký: I thought you are suggesting that Linux developer should make it work in VPC. Probably because I seriously doubt MS has any interest in making latest Linux work there properly. :) Well, they did make a deal with this company called Novell to collaborate on virtualization technology, if I'm not mistaken. ;) But hey, it's called Virtual PC 2007, so we can't expect it to run 2009 software. For that we have to wait for the next big release, buy a Windows upgrade and then upgrade our hardware to make it run as fast as before. That's their interest. :) Yeah... I guess you are right :) On a more serious note, if you don't want to buy VMware you could try QEMU. It's not as comfortable to use but Linux runs pretty well there, including some non-x86 platforms. Andreas ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list -- http://www.volatileminds.net ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic
Hello, I tried running my mono application and it says it can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic ? The app is in VB but I just installed the mono-complete package through Yast.. Any ideas? Thanks, Eric ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic
Did you installed mono-basic? From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of eschnei...@schneidersoft.com Sent: domingo, 8 de Março de 2009 22:08 To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: [Mono-list] Can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic Hello, I tried running my mono application and it says it can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic ? The app is in VB but I just installed the mono-complete package through Yast.. Any ideas? Thanks, Eric ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic
Just the following: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/ And Mono-complete From: Jorge Bastos mysql.jo...@decimal.pt Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 5:11 PM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic Did you installed mono-basic? From: mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of eschnei...@schneidersoft.com Sent: domingo, 8 de Março de 2009 22:08 To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: [Mono-list] Can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic Hello, I tried running my mono application and it says it can't find Microsoft.VisualBasic ? The app is in VB but I just installed the mono-complete package through Yast.. Any ideas? Thanks, Eric ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
